Ghost Sites of the Web

Web 1.0 history, forgotten web celebrities, old web sites, commentary, and news by Steve Baldwin. Published erratically since 1996.

July 15, 2007

The Great Web Crash of 2007: Continuing Coverage

Breaking News: All Online Data Lost After Internet Crash

I'm a big fan of The Onion (America's Finest News Source) because it always provokes a chuckle. But could the Web actually crash, eliminating all data? How crazy are we to imagine that the data that actually define our lives is safe once it passes beyond our hard drives? Here's a tip for all of you: if you care about it, back it up on something more durable than a CD-ROM that will corrode in a few years. If you don't there may well come a day when a significant part of your life is no longer there for you.

Thanks to ValleyWag for posting this initially.

Labels: ,

June 13, 2007's Fiction Archive To Be Destroyed

What happens to user-generated content when the company that hosts it decides that it no longer wants to host it? Well, it's destroyed, wiping out thousands of hours worth of collective effort.

The most brutal, unconscionable case of such destruction occurred in 2003, when C|Net, after acquiring, unilaterally destroyed the collective work of thousands of musicians who had freely contributed material to this site. See Crimes Against History: CNET, to Destroy World's Largest MP3 Archive, 11/23/2003.

This Friday,, a property owned by NBC Universal, will destroy its user-generated Fiction Archive. Currently, the archive contains material submitted by users as early as 2000.

The stupidity of this move astounds me. Some of these articles apparently have a ton of in-bound links, which benefits in terms of PageRank. I can only imagine the scenario, six months from now, when drops off the Google SERPS and an investigation is launched to find out who authorized this clueless move. Whoever did it will probably lose their job.

The lesson here is that you should never trust media companies to treat the material you send them with any respect. Keep local copies of everything you hold dear, or you'll wind up rueing the day. Properties change hands, people change their minds, and unless you actually control your data, you'll eventually get burned.

Thanks to Joel Schlosberg for bringing this imminent destruction to my attention.

Labels: , ,

November 21, 2003

Crimes Against History: CNET, to Destroy World's Largest MP3 Archive

A sharply barbed, but cheerfully cheeky article written by Andrew Orlowski in The Register contains details about's recently announced "partial" acquisition of the assets of - the world's largest repository of "legal" MP3 music files.

According to the article,'s acquisition only extends to certain "specific assets" relating to's domain name and back end file-serving technology, not the site's massive file MP3 music file archive, which will be destroyed sometime after December 2, 2003.

Orlowski writes:
Not since the Great Leap Forward has there been such a destruction of the commons. Back then, for political reasons, millions of books were burned. Now, for very sensible commercial reasons that we must not question, millions of MP3s will be lost to the commons. You have precisely seventeen days to grab the good stuff.

Some might find it a bit disingenuous to compare the millions of MP3 files on - many of which even the most open-minded music reviewers would agree are of marginal quality - with the fine old books destroyed by the Communists and the Nazis back in the bad old 20th Century. But Orlowski is making an important point here: the destruction of the multi-gigabyte libraries will create a gigantic hole that will be impossible to be patched by future cultural historians - a "data holocaust" whose future effects cannot possibly be known right now.

One might even go so far as to question whether the music on - at least some of it - isn't superior, or at least more originally innovative than the vast majority of music playing on America's tightly playlisted FM radio stations, which are controlled by a handful of conglomerated, juvenocratic taste arbiters that have "dumbed down" society's collective pop culture to the sub-nadir point.

Of course, it's true that many or most of the files now residing on's servers will continue to exist on the hard drives and CD disks of the many thousands of artists who chose to upload their creative works to a central repository. So what's the fuss about? Unless all copies of a digital work are wiped out, how is digital culture diminished?

Well, it's not just the information that's important, but the information about the information (Note: pipe-smoking, chin-stroking, lotus-eating info-theorists from Northern California call this stuff "meta-information"). In the case of the file archives, this meta-information is frequently more interesting than the files themselves. How many times was a given satirical tune about, say, Bush or Blair downloaded? Which appeared on whose streaming radio playlists? Did, say the "grunge" genre grow or wane from 1998 to 2000? What did the digital musical underground think of the 9/11/01 attacks and how did they respond? What was the ratio of pro-war to anti-war songs uploaded in, say, the Spring of 2003? The list of possible "meta-information-related queries" that might be posed in the future goes on and on.

In its heyday, also provided artists who agreed to freely share their musical works home page-building tools, resulting in many thousands of home pages being built from 1998 onward. What will happen to all of these fascinatingly obscure pages, which's users spent hundreds of thousand of unpaid person-hours creating?

In the flick of a switch on December 3rd, 2003, all of this will be lost - forever. Funny, isn't it, that we live in a time where you can go to jail for copying a single MP3 file, but not a single law prohibts a company from destroying millions of them!

Defenders of the impending destruction will surely mention that neither nor CNET had any necessary contractual obligation to preserve works uploaded to its service, and that is certainly true in the purely legal sense. In a moral sense, however, the callous disregard for the worldwide collaberative effort that built ranks among the most sordid acts yet seen in the history of the Web. Without the critical mass of content uploaded by musicians to the service, would never have become enough of a force on the Web to gain investment money from Vivendi/Universal, and now, to seal a lucrative deal with CNET. These musicians were used by's executives to get rich, and now everything they built is being junked. My guess is that had any single artist known the fate eventually awaiting their virtual projects, they would have chosen another service, or built there own sites, but now, all that awaits them are hundreds, perhaps thousands, of broken incoming links.

History is a fragile thing in an age of bits. Any "guarantees of persistence" that history used to enjoy becuase its vehicle was a physical medium no longer exist. Once destroyed, it is gone forever. By presuming that people of the future will regard our electronic cultural products such as the archive in exactly the same way that we do now - in terms of their commodity value - we take an enormous, arrogant risk.

By shunning any and all obligation to the future, as well as to the artists across the world who invested millions of hours of creative effort in creating a shared cultural resource, we commit a new category of crime: call it "A Crime Against History". Those of us who spend time worrying about digital history - and the larger question of whether digital information has any history at all in store for it - will find a disturbing precedent here. Other common resources that we take for granted (even the Web itself) may soon be balkanized, broken up, or deleted for purely economic reasons. Other "trusted" institutions (and was certainly trusted by the people who uploaded files to it) may turn wicked in a moment's time.

Perhaps history, to paraphrase Clauswitz, is now "too important to be left to the historians". It is certainly too important to be left to the wiles of callous businessmen who, for a few pounds of silver, will so easily betray the trust of thousands of digital musicians and listeners across the world.

Labels: , ,

Click Here to Return to the Ghost Sites Home Page