Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Gyll Hill"
(Explanation for edits.) |
m (No self-citing, right...) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
--[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT) | --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Whoops, just saw this: | ||
| + | |||
| + | <pre> | ||
| + | <Morbus> you cited CHS as your previous, but you defined that one. | ||
| + | <Morbus> perm to change to Folktown Records? | ||
| + | </pre> | ||
| + | |||
| + | and reverting. | ||
| + | |||
| + | --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:54, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 08:54, 30 October 2004
I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well.
Other edits--raucously (typo), and Ecstasy (misspelling)--fine, and The Folktown Records is a good catch.
--Sean B. Palmer 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)
Whoops, just saw this:
<Morbus> you cited CHS as your previous, but you defined that one. <Morbus> perm to change to Folktown Records?
and reverting.
--Sean B. Palmer 08:54, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)
