Ghyll talk:Baron Claude Lloyd Albert Smallwood

Out-Of-Game Discussion

Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry, but please note that it has too many citations: you're meant to reference only one existing one, and two new entries (i.e. phantom entries), but you've listed several. The rationale is that if we define too many phantom entries, it's going to be impossible for us to catch up in subsequent turns. Please pick just one existing one, and two new ones. No need to change the body of your entry, just the Citations bit at the bottom -- we'll do the rest. --Sean B. Palmer 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --Morbus Iff 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

How the devil can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none. --John Cowan 1:28, 12 Sep 2004

See what happens when I do this with a hangover?! Morbus was quite correct in his assumptions. My mistake was in the misinterpretation of the rules on Citations. I appreciate the correction. I was a bit rushed into this as I joined just in time to make the first deadline. My apologies for not reading all the FAQs well enough. As to the fuzzy ritual reference... Well, as always, Mr. Cowan was correct and I have corrected myself. Hopefully, it is more clear now. --Doctor Phineas Crank 13:01, 12 Sep 2004

Right, I think I've corrected all my title lacking entries, but if anyone sees one I've missed, please, feel free to correct it. --Doctor Phineas Crank 16:46, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)