Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Meldersen"
		
		
		
		
		
		
		Jump to navigation
		Jump to search
		
				
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
		
	
|  (Rules question...and it helps if you spell the links correctly) | PhineasCrank (talk | contribs)  m (I pushed this envelope myself, back in the old days, when I was funny) | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous manuscript]] cites Melderson. | I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous manuscript]] cites Melderson. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Well, if I recall correctly, as long as it's not one of your citations, it can be done.  In other words, your one old and two new links/entries/citations can NOT refer back to your own work, but after that, it's up for grabs.  (And, I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.) -- [[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:11, 20 Dec 2004 (EST) | ||
Revision as of 17:11, 20 December 2004
I observe that rule #3 states: "Scholars shall neither cite themselves, nor write phantoms they were the first to cite."
I mention this because your entry on Luminous manuscript cites Melderson.
Well, if I recall correctly, as long as it's not one of your citations, it can be done. In other words, your one old and two new links/entries/citations can NOT refer back to your own work, but after that, it's up for grabs. (And, I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.) -- Doctor Phineas Crank 16:11, 20 Dec 2004 (EST)
