|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | All good now. The new pre-existing phantom is "Organization", since it was so easy to find a way to relate that to the article. Ran-wossname's papers have been forwarded in time, and everything should be as it should be. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 20:54, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
| + | {{ResolvedTalk}} |
| − | | |
| − | :Ranwossname! Yes! Let's go with that! --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 20:58, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Um, might I suggest you phantom that whole name, not just Organization? Because there are a lot of articles which have the word Organization in them and I doubt that this organization is related to all of them, unless you are either (a) trying to start a conspiracy or (b) hoping that someone will define Organization... --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 23:12, 7 Jul 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::Organization has been a phantom for a number of turns now. I'm fine with it. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:14, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::It had? Wow. I'm not very observant, apparently. :) --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:30, 9 Jul 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::Yeah, if I phantomed the whole name, I'd be making a new phantom. I've already done that in this article, and I like the name "Ungerry-Tubers". --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 22:17, 8 Jul 2005 (EDT)
| |
Latest revision as of 20:28, 9 July 2005
This Talk: page once existed, but has since been resolved, refactored, or made irrelevant.
To see the text that was once here, choose a previous version under the History tab.
If you need to add new discussion, remove the reference to this template.
