|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Since I'm still not quite clear on the rules of in-game & out-of-game scholarly discussion, I'd like to post the following as notes to the page as an in-game scholarly debate:
| + | Question: Odgar IV got elected to the post of [[rejah]], and then "established what he referred to ever after as 'The Court of Odgar IV.'" This court is in the Eastern quarter of [[Iganefta]]. How does he get control over the role changing of Arbuckle Hill? Was it just pompous positioning on his part? --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 18:49, 23 May 2005 (EDT) |
| − | | |
| − | A true scholar would have noted that the "Early Days" are mere mythology as the so-called [[Creator]] has no proof of existance and only Ghyllian word of mouth supports this "historical" recollection. Ghyllian scholars should refrain from imparting religious bias into their scholary texts. --[[User:Lisa B. Underhalh|Lisa B. Underhalh]] 14:13, 19 May 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Ultimately, the Talk: pages are for out-of-game discussions ("dude, your dates are all crazy", "yeah, well, you missed by Easter Egg!") and the bottom of the actual entries are used for scholarly debate (so, your comment above would get moved to beneath the real entry). There is no hard and fast rule for WHEN, however, it is permissable to add your scholarly comment to a page: generally speaking, if there are indications that the entry is "done", then that's as good a time as any. That means, at the latest, scholarly comments can always be legitimately placed once the next turn starts. But, if there are indications that the player is finished with his entry ("Copyedit please" as opposed to "First draft, more later."), then that's clear indication that they're ready for comments, both in- and out-. As for canonization: scholarly comments are not canon - that is, unless someone decides to make them canon by including their facts in the body of a future entry. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 15:28, 19 May 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::Thanks. When the author either mentions here that the article is done or the turn passes, I'll post the above and allow the talk page to be reverted to white space per obsolete discusion. --[[User:Lisa B. Underhalh|Lisa B. Underhalh]] 16:20, 19 May 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::I didn't actually notice it until AFTER I commented, but I'd take the author's OWN scholarly comment as an indicator that he willing/ready to accept more. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 16:31, 19 May 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I will gladly add your comment to the article itself. Even if it is twaddle. ;) --[[User:DrAckroyd|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 19:50, 19 May 2005 (EDT)
| |
Revision as of 18:49, 23 May 2005
Question: Odgar IV got elected to the post of rejah, and then "established what he referred to ever after as 'The Court of Odgar IV.'" This court is in the Eastern quarter of Iganefta. How does he get control over the role changing of Arbuckle Hill? Was it just pompous positioning on his part? --Morbus Iff 18:49, 23 May 2005 (EDT)
