|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Blabbermouves and their wifes simply do not understand the full intrications and subtleties behind the whole Forbidden Tom scene. A "Forbidden Tom" can only be a phrase that when, unreified, as it hath appeared in the pretagnonistic part of this sentence, denote thus: a couple who are both female sex'd and incumbent upon one another in social spirit mainly but oft' physickly too. Take it, I did, in the ides of March there was a play acted out at the [[Baleman|Bailman]]--or probably the Amplifeature in Folktown since the [[Baleman|Bailman]] was destructionified as we have it told by our grandparents in the early part of the preceeding one hundred years--that soothely told foreshawl of the wit and prolegomenonatry behind the entire Forbidden Tom whim. The play, conceived as a device in two separate conjunctions, was onbiddan to demonstrate the ethic and morale behind the seeming intertwist of femme paersonagges what are the new Toms only as Toms themselfs could say. That such as could expositionary tale-tell that [[Elminster Mire|Elminsyter Mirian]] ceremonies part play central to the acted precession since imbued in soltrification were the inceptors of that love which laughs between the Tombidden lovers.
| + | Probably best if I forfeit this turn instead! |
| | | | |
| − | Whaet! The First Ack't, as it hath been duly accognizanced: That A Player, female, takes the stage and surely her sapphisty and protocol unchanged cry out to the crow'd whereupon a raven fair emerges from the public and vanquished by nature idolatry unto the actors' guild she's behoofed and carries alike their manner not such that she she be as obvious fraed be shown, but instead no, perhaps a hyponavarice is held to her by the very ackting of the play.
| + | --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 18:24, 22 Oct 2004 (EDT) |
| − | | |
| − | The Second Ack't, thus accognizanced: a symbraldry of the pantheistic pregative of the hundred or two or foreleague and seven sevens years in which pass the love into familiarity, the familiarity into order, the order into kindness, and the kindness into ritual, the ritual which staggersly from the play unholds and love again follows as the winter the spring. Segways now unmittingly into that renderous love between Pholius and Efflessa, memorably liv'd and documented as well as thus would ever be played. Rapturous can the crowd now only be, and the Third Ack't may be preformed on the sleep straws of eventide.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Such was it that likely unspittersflay taking in whirlypool, but Forbidden Toms must to unfoiced avoid and to each other trike as liked they would or popular-court and sophistry as would be seen in vials of [[Folktown Records]] and even the carziest symns of those [[Houvers]] that dwellances unto the houves are mere roofs to turfinine seemingry.
| |
| − | | |
| − | --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 17:02, 15 Oct 2004 (EDT) | |
Revision as of 17:24, 22 October 2004
Probably best if I forfeit this turn instead!
--Sean B. Palmer 18:24, 22 Oct 2004 (EDT)
