Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Great Awakening"

From Disobiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
(No, it's good!)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. [[User:AaronSw|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 
Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. [[User:AaronSw|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
 +
 +
:I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece.  However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem).  You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the [[Phantom Index]] to find one that's appropriate.  --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)

Revision as of 08:32, 29 June 2005

Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. AaronSw 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)

I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece. However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem). You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the Phantom Index to find one that's appropriate. --John Cowan 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)