Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Last witness"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(quick spelling/vocab question) |
(* Answer *) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
So while I'm nitpicking the spelling -- did you use "habitants" on purpose for its slightly out-of-the-ordinary flavor, or should it be "inhabitants?" --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra]] 21:11, 13 Aug 2005 (EDT) | So while I'm nitpicking the spelling -- did you use "habitants" on purpose for its slightly out-of-the-ordinary flavor, or should it be "inhabitants?" --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra]] 21:11, 13 Aug 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I used 'habitants' on accident. I'm still not sure how I was able to keep reading over it and never seeing that. But I suppose I could have left it as it was, it would just cause more confusion as more people would read it and wonder if I had made a misspelling or not. And, eventually, some overzealous scholar would change it to 'inhabitants' without a second glance. :) --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 02:54, 14 Aug 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 02:54, 14 August 2005
So while I'm nitpicking the spelling -- did you use "habitants" on purpose for its slightly out-of-the-ordinary flavor, or should it be "inhabitants?" --Lady Aleksandra 21:11, 13 Aug 2005 (EDT)
- I used 'habitants' on accident. I'm still not sure how I was able to keep reading over it and never seeing that. But I suppose I could have left it as it was, it would just cause more confusion as more people would read it and wonder if I had made a misspelling or not. And, eventually, some overzealous scholar would change it to 'inhabitants' without a second glance. :) --Trousle Undrhil 02:54, 14 Aug 2005 (EDT)
