Ghyll talk:Zavinian House - Revision history

Snood Trunion at 05:33, 26 November 2005

2005-11-26T05:33:47Z

Morbus Iff: In hindsight, I'll let it stand.

2005-11-23T04:48:21Z

In hindsight, I'll let it stand.

Morbus Iff: Why your "historically speaking" makes no sense at all.

2005-11-23T04:32:56Z

Why your "historically speaking" makes no sense at all.

New page

The Iganeftan family didn't exist back in -2000 [[EC]]. Records of the "City of Settlements", now Iganefta, go back as far as -400 only (back then, it was known as the "Old City"), and even then, the history is shady (according to [[Iganefta]]). It is quite unlikely that there'd be any, even remotely possible, evidence of the Iganefta family from way back in -2000 EC. It'd be about equivalent to saying that this year's Toyota was "rumored" to have been based on designs from -10 B.C., equally preposterous. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 23:32, 22 November 2005 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:33, 26 November 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:In hindsight, I'll let it stand. There's enough ambiguity to allow the Iganefta family having been around a long long time before actually rising to any sort of "power" in -400 [[EC]] with their own Settlement. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 23:48, 22 November 2005 (EST)		:In hindsight, I'll let it stand. There's enough ambiguity to allow the Iganefta family having been around a long long time before actually rising to any sort of "power" in -400 [[EC]] with their own Settlement. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 23:48, 22 November 2005 (EST)
		+
		+	::That's the thing with writing about the period before about -500 [[EC]]: it's ''all'' ambiguous, if you want to think of it that way. I don't want to exert a power trip, but when I wrote of the [[Absolute Erasure]], it seems to have called attention to the fact that a lot of what we know about the years before [[King Harandraff the Great\|Harandraff's]] reign might have been recreated by the King, and a lot of things might have happened that were lost to the Erasure. And even if the King had done no such thing, there certainly aren't any 2100-year-old scholars in Ghyll. That I know of. And I hope you're not just letting my version of Iganeftan history stand just because of [[User:Nikos of Ant\|Nikos']] revision of the Iganefta article. Then I'd think you were paying me special attention.
		+
		+	::Oh yes, and Happiest Thanksgiving to you, Morbus. --[[User:Snood Trunion\|Snood Trunion]] 00:33, 26 November 2005 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:48, 23 November 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	The Iganeftan family didn't exist back in -2000 [[EC]]. Records of the "City of Settlements", now Iganefta, go back as far as -400 only (back then, it was known as the "Old City"), and even then, the history is shady (according to [[Iganefta]]). It is quite unlikely that there'd be any, even remotely possible, evidence of the Iganefta family from way back in -2000 EC. It'd be about equivalent to saying that this year's Toyota was "rumored" to have been based on designs from -10 B.C., equally preposterous. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 23:32, 22 November 2005 (EST)		The Iganeftan family didn't exist back in -2000 [[EC]]. Records of the "City of Settlements", now Iganefta, go back as far as -400 only (back then, it was known as the "Old City"), and even then, the history is shady (according to [[Iganefta]]). It is quite unlikely that there'd be any, even remotely possible, evidence of the Iganefta family from way back in -2000 EC. It'd be about equivalent to saying that this year's Toyota was "rumored" to have been based on designs from -10 B.C., equally preposterous. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 23:32, 22 November 2005 (EST)
		+
		+	:In hindsight, I'll let it stand. There's enough ambiguity to allow the Iganefta family having been around a long long time before actually rising to any sort of "power" in -400 [[EC]] with their own Settlement. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 23:48, 22 November 2005 (EST)