Ghyll talk:Sarfelogian Mountains - Revision history

Morbus Iff at 20:08, 3 October 2005

2005-10-03T20:08:08Z

Morbus Iff: Adding note about no inline citation of orthogonality.

2005-05-25T23:03:02Z

Adding note about no inline citation of orthogonality.

Morbus Iff: Using the new ResolvedTalk template for whitespaced pages.

2005-05-13T20:11:56Z

Using the new ResolvedTalk template for whitespaced pages.

Morbus Iff: Whitespaced resolved Talk.

2005-05-13T18:27:59Z

Whitespaced resolved Talk.

DrAckroyd: more note.

2005-05-08T16:59:56Z

more note.

DrAckroyd: Altitude Adjustments & Note.

2005-05-08T16:57:40Z

Altitude Adjustments & Note.

DrAckroyd at 15:47, 27 April 2005

2005-04-27T15:47:20Z

DrBacchus: Mt. Speedbump.

2005-02-28T20:11:46Z

Mt. Speedbump.

Morbus Iff: How tall are Ghyllians anyways?

2005-02-28T20:06:04Z

How tall are Ghyllians anyways?

DrAckroyd: afternote

2005-02-28T19:01:50Z

afternote

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:08, 3 October 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Note''': The inline link and mention of [[orthogonality]] has been removed due to recent updates per my timestamp. Regardless of today's world, [[orthogonality]] was still a valid ~~satifaction~~ of the rules at the time the entry was written, so we've not modified the '''Citations''' line. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 19:03, 25 May 2005 (EDT)	+	'''Note''': The inline link and mention of [[orthogonality]] has been removed due to recent updates per my timestamp. Regardless of today's world, [[orthogonality]] was still a valid satisfaction of the rules at the time the entry was written, so we've not modified the '''Citations''' line. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 19:03, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 23:03, 25 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~{{ResolvedTalk}}~~	+	'''Note''': The inline link and mention of [[orthogonality]] has been removed due to recent updates per my timestamp. Regardless of today's world, [[orthogonality]] was still a valid satifaction of the rules at the time the entry was written, so we've not modified the '''Citations''' line. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 19:03, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:11, 13 May 2005
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	{{ResolvedTalk}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:27, 13 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	In [[Mount Yurch]], we discover it is the tallest mountain in Ghyll ("Mount Yurch is 18,764 nanits tall, making it about 4,000 nanits taller than Mount Rotyg"). Your particular entry, however, makes Kluvat Peak about ten times bigger than that: ''16 (nanits) * 9 (unanits) * 11 (kunanit) * 70.7 (lunanits) = 110800 (nanits)''. Is that the right calculation? If so, this entry would need to be revised: a) use nanits for a measurement, b) make sure it's smaller than 14,764 nanits. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 08:56, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)

−	~~Using my math I get 70.7 * 11 * 9 * 16 = 111988.8 nanits but that still makes it taller.~~
−	I used an actual mountain in the Appalacians for my model - Mt. Mitchell which is 2,037 meters tall or (2037 / 1000 / 20 = ) 101850 nanits which is reduced to 64.3 lunanits (I musta futzed the math when I originally wrote the entry). The Grimm Mr Yurch is a mere (18764 * 20 /1000 =) 375 meters tall. Hardly a daunting climb by my reckoning. Perhaps nanits aren't the best measurements for mountains after all? Nevermind, I'll revise my entry. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 13:57, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)
−
−	~~<table class="ghyllidx" style="padding-left:1em;">~~
−	~~<tr><th>Mountain Name</th><th>Height (lunanits)</th><th>Height (meters)</th></tr>~~
−	~~<tr><td>Mount Yurch </td><td align="center">118.4</td><td align="center">3,752.8</td></tr>~~
−	~~<tr><td>Mount Rotyg </td><td align="center">93.2</td><td align="center">2,952.8</td></tr>~~
−	~~<tr><td>Kluvat Peak </td><td align="center">70.7</td><td align="center">2,239.7</td></tr>~~
−	~~</table>~~
−
−	By moving the decimal in the lunanit measurement I get a new conversion of 11,198.88 nanits for Kluvat Peak. I still think that measuring a Mountain in nanits is sort of like measuring it in inches. If you ''really'' want it in nanits I'll comply. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 14:01, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)
−
−	~~I'm fine with lunaits. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 15:06, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)~~
−
−	Yeah, I would have to agree. The tallest mountain I've climbed, Mt. Kenya, is 5199m. By comparison, Mt. Yurch appears to be a speedbump. Let's fix this. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 15:11, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)
−
−	I am going to propose a mad edit conversion of increasing the heights of all of the natural landmarks of Ghyll by a multiple of 10. That will provide for the least amount of math and the simplist conversion. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 11:47, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)
−
−	Mad edit done. Mount Yurch, Mount Rotyg and the Sarfelogians are now 10 times taller. By comparison, the tallest mountain in Australia (the flattest country I can think of) is Mount Kosciusko at 2,228 meters. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 12:57, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:59, 8 May 2005
Line 19:		Line 19:
	I am going to propose a mad edit conversion of increasing the heights of all of the natural landmarks of Ghyll by a multiple of 10. That will provide for the least amount of math and the simplist conversion. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 11:47, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)		I am going to propose a mad edit conversion of increasing the heights of all of the natural landmarks of Ghyll by a multiple of 10. That will provide for the least amount of math and the simplist conversion. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 11:47, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)

−	Mad edit done. Mount Yurch, Mount Rotyg and the Sarfelogians are now 10 times taller. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 12:57, 8 May 2005 (EDT)	+	Mad edit done. Mount Yurch, Mount Rotyg and the Sarfelogians are now 10 times taller. By comparison, the tallest mountain in Australia (the flattest country I can think of) is Mount Kosciusko at 2,228 meters. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 12:57, 8 May 2005 (EDT)

@@ Line 6: / Line 6: @@
 <table class="ghyllidx" style="padding-left:1em;">
 <tr><th>Mountain Name</th><th>Height (lunanits)</th><th>Height (meters)</th></tr>
-<tr><td>Mount Yurch </td><td align="center">11.84</td><td align="center">375.28</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Mount Yurch </td><td align="center">118.4</td><td align="center">3,752.8</td></tr>
-<tr><td>Mount Rotyg </td><td align="center">9.32</td><td align="center">295.28</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Mount Rotyg </td><td align="center">93.2</td><td align="center">2,952.8</td></tr>
-<tr><td>Kluvat Peak </td><td align="center">7.07</td><td align="center">223.97</td></tr>
+<tr><td>Kluvat Peak </td><td align="center">70.7</td><td align="center">2,239.7</td></tr>
 </table>
@@ Line 18: / Line 18: @@
 I am going to propose a mad edit conversion of increasing the heights of all of the natural landmarks of Ghyll by a multiple of 10.  That will provide for the least amount of math and the simplist conversion.  --[[User:DrAckroyd|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 11:47, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 27 April 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Yeah, I would have to agree. The tallest mountain I've climbed, Mt. Kenya, is 5199m. By comparison, Mt. Yurch appears to be a speedbump. Let's fix this. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 15:11, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)		Yeah, I would have to agree. The tallest mountain I've climbed, Mt. Kenya, is 5199m. By comparison, Mt. Yurch appears to be a speedbump. Let's fix this. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 15:11, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)
		+
		+	I am going to propose a mad edit conversion of increasing the heights of all of the natural landmarks of Ghyll by a multiple of 10. That will provide for the least amount of math and the simplist conversion. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 11:47, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:11, 28 February 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I'm fine with lunaits. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 15:06, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)		I'm fine with lunaits. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 15:06, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)
		+
		+	Yeah, I would have to agree. The tallest mountain I've climbed, Mt. Kenya, is 5199m. By comparison, Mt. Yurch appears to be a speedbump. Let's fix this. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 15:11, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:06, 28 February 2005
Line 12:		Line 12:

	By moving the decimal in the lunanit measurement I get a new conversion of 11,198.88 nanits for Kluvat Peak. I still think that measuring a Mountain in nanits is sort of like measuring it in inches. If you ''really'' want it in nanits I'll comply. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 14:01, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)		By moving the decimal in the lunanit measurement I get a new conversion of 11,198.88 nanits for Kluvat Peak. I still think that measuring a Mountain in nanits is sort of like measuring it in inches. If you ''really'' want it in nanits I'll comply. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 14:01, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)
		+
		+	I'm fine with lunaits. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 15:06, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:01, 28 February 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:
	<tr><td>Kluvat Peak </td><td align="center">7.07</td><td align="center">223.97</td></tr>		<tr><td>Kluvat Peak </td><td align="center">7.07</td><td align="center">223.97</td></tr>
	</table>		</table>
		+
		+	By moving the decimal in the lunanit measurement I get a new conversion of 11,198.88 nanits for Kluvat Peak. I still think that measuring a Mountain in nanits is sort of like measuring it in inches. If you ''really'' want it in nanits I'll comply. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 14:01, 28 Feb 2005 (EST)