Ghyll talk:Orthogonalities - Revision history

Jcowan: Removing resolved Talk, leaving the rest behind

2005-05-31T02:56:23Z

Removing resolved Talk, leaving the rest behind

Morbus Iff: "Answers" for Underhil.

2005-05-26T21:35:03Z

"Answers" for Underhil.

Undrhil: * Surely Orthogonality C has (or had?) more than one inhabitant? *

2005-05-26T19:21:08Z

* Surely Orthogonality C has (or had?) more than one inhabitant? *

Undrhil: * Questioning Orthogonalities can be dangerous to your health ... or something. Maybe. *

2005-05-26T19:20:02Z

* Questioning Orthogonalities can be dangerous to your health ... or something. Maybe. *

Morbus Iff: Math websites and dunno.

2005-05-25T16:05:50Z

Math websites and dunno.

Larj Zyquon: Great diagrams!

2005-05-25T15:37:01Z

Great diagrams!

New page

What a cool entry :-) What did you use to create the diagrams? --[[User:Larj Zyquon|Larj Zyquon]] 11:37, 25 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:56, 31 May 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT)		:The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT)
−
−	OK, so orthogonalities are sort of like dimensions? So, while Ghyll is one dimension, the [[Xurient]] is another one? Or am I looking at this too complicatedly? If my original thought is correct, then may I quite calmly suggest that the inhabitants of Orthogonality C in the final image are likely either very good dancers or really dizzy all the time, since it appears to be a spinning orthogonality. :) --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 15:20, 26 May 2005 (EDT)
−
−	:I wouldn't say "dimensions"... more "planes of existence" (and even that is up for rebuttal). And remember, the picture you're referring to is a 3-D representation (the shape) of a 4-D concept (the orthogonality) on a 2-D medium (the image). While it intersects on a curved line, that does not mean that it is a spherical or "ring world". See also ''It is believed, however, that turning points increase uniformly in every direction, which is why Ghyll proper and the other orthogonalities can be modeled as having circular surfaces.'' --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 17:35, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 :The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT)
-----
+OK, so orthogonalities are sort of like dimensions?  So, while Ghyll is one dimension, the [[Xurient]] is another one?  Or am I looking at this too complicatedly?  If my original thought is correct, then may I quite calmly suggest that the inhabitants of Orthogonality C in the final image are likely either very good dancers or really dizzy all the time, since it appears to be a spinning orthogonality. :) --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 15:20, 26 May 2005 (EDT)
-OK, so Orthogonalities are sort of like diminsions?  So, while Ghyll is one diminsion, the [[Xurient]] is another one?  Or am I looking at this too complicatedly?  If my original thought is correct, then may I quite calmly suggest that the inhabitants of Orthogonality C in the final image are likely either very good dancers or really dizzy all the time, since it appears to be a spinning orthogonality.  :) --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 15:20, 26 May 2005 (EDT)
+:I wouldn't say "dimensions"... more "planes of existence" (and even that is up for rebuttal). And remember, the picture you're referring to is a 3-D representation (the shape) of a 4-D concept (the orthogonality) on a 2-D medium (the image). While it intersects on a curved line, that does not mean that it is a spherical or "ring world". See also ''It is believed, however, that turning points increase uniformly in every direction, which is why Ghyll proper and the other orthogonalities can be modeled as having circular surfaces.'' --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 17:35, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:21, 26 May 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	----		----

−	OK, so Orthogonalities are sort of like diminsions? So, while Ghyll is one diminsion, the [[Xurient]] is another one? Or am I looking at this too complicatedly? If my original thought is correct, then may I quite calmly suggest that the ~~inhabitant~~ of Orthogonality C in the final image are likely either very good dancers or really dizzy all the time, since it appears to be a spinning orthogonality. :) --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 15:20, 26 May 2005 (EDT)	+	OK, so Orthogonalities are sort of like diminsions? So, while Ghyll is one diminsion, the [[Xurient]] is another one? Or am I looking at this too complicatedly? If my original thought is correct, then may I quite calmly suggest that the inhabitants of Orthogonality C in the final image are likely either very good dancers or really dizzy all the time, since it appears to be a spinning orthogonality. :) --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 15:20, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:20, 26 May 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT)		:The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	OK, so Orthogonalities are sort of like diminsions? So, while Ghyll is one diminsion, the [[Xurient]] is another one? Or am I looking at this too complicatedly? If my original thought is correct, then may I quite calmly suggest that the inhabitant of Orthogonality C in the final image are likely either very good dancers or really dizzy all the time, since it appears to be a spinning orthogonality. :) --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 15:20, 26 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:05, 25 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	What a cool entry :-) What did you use to create the diagrams? --[[User:Larj Zyquon\|Larj Zyquon]] 11:37, 25 May 2005 (EDT)		What a cool entry :-) What did you use to create the diagrams? --[[User:Larj Zyquon\|Larj Zyquon]] 11:37, 25 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:The first two I found on some math websites, and the final two were created to my spec by an artist friend of mine. Not sure what app he used. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 12:05, 25 May 2005 (EDT)