Ghyll talk:Meldersen - Revision history

Morbus Iff: Using the new ResolvedTalk template for whitespaced pages.

2005-05-13T20:20:43Z

Using the new ResolvedTalk template for whitespaced pages.

Jcowan: Deleting obsolete discussion

2005-01-13T12:50:50Z

Deleting obsolete discussion

Morbus Iff: Ayup, thanks, explanation, yadda yadda.

2004-12-21T05:12:27Z

Ayup, thanks, explanation, yadda yadda.

PhineasCrank: I pushed this envelope myself, back in the old days, when I was funny

2004-12-20T21:11:47Z

I pushed this envelope myself, back in the old days, when I was funny

DrAckroyd: Rules question...and it helps if you spell the links correctly

2004-12-20T21:05:43Z

Rules question...and it helps if you spell the links correctly

DrAckroyd at 21:04, 20 December 2004

2004-12-20T21:04:53Z

New page

I observe that rule #3 states: "Scholars shall neither cite themselves, nor write phantoms they were the first to cite."

I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous Manuscripts]] cites Melderson.

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:20, 13 May 2005
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	{{ResolvedTalk}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:50, 13 January 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I observe that rule #3 states: "Scholars shall neither cite themselves, nor write phantoms they were the first to cite." I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous manuscript]] cites Melderson. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 16:05, 20 Dec 2004

−	Well, if I recall correctly, as long as it's not one of your citations, it can be done. In other words, your one old and two new links/entries/citations can NOT refer back to your own work, but after that, it's up for grabs. (And, I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.) -- [[User:PhineasCrank\|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:11, 20 Dec 2004 (EST)
−
−	''Who watches the watchers?'' You're both right. Yes, rule #3 was violated unknowingly by myself (as I both ''originally'' phantomed [[Meldersen]], and then cited it in my ''required per-turn citations''), but this should now be fixed ([[Meldersen]] was swapped out with a newly created phantom, the [[Iganefta Recorder]]). Thanks for catching this. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 00:12, 21 Dec 2004 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-I observe that rule #3 states: "Scholars shall neither cite themselves, nor write phantoms they were the first to cite."
+I observe that rule #3 states: "Scholars shall neither cite themselves, nor write phantoms they were the first to cite." I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous manuscript]] cites Melderson. --[[User:DrAckroyd|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 16:05, 20 Dec 2004
-I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous manuscript]] cites Melderson.
+Well, if I recall correctly, as long as it's not one of your citations, it can be done.  In other words, your one old and two new links/entries/citations can NOT refer back to your own work, but after that, it's up for grabs.  (And, I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.) -- [[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:11, 20 Dec 2004 (EST)
-Well, if I recall correctly, as long as it's not one of your citations, it can be done.  In other words, your one old and two new links/entries/citations can NOT refer back to your own work, but after that, it's up for grabs.  (And, I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.) -- [[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:11, 20 Dec 2004 (EST)
+''Who watches the watchers?'' You're both right. Yes, rule #3 was violated unknowingly by myself (as I both ''originally'' phantomed [[Meldersen]], and then cited it in my ''required per-turn citations''), but this should now be fixed ([[Meldersen]] was swapped out with a newly created phantom, the [[Iganefta Recorder]]). Thanks for catching this. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 00:12, 21 Dec 2004 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:11, 20 December 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous manuscript]] cites Melderson.		I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous manuscript]] cites Melderson.
		+
		+	Well, if I recall correctly, as long as it's not one of your citations, it can be done. In other words, your one old and two new links/entries/citations can NOT refer back to your own work, but after that, it's up for grabs. (And, I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.) -- [[User:PhineasCrank\|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:11, 20 Dec 2004 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:05, 20 December 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I observe that rule #3 states: "Scholars shall neither cite themselves, nor write phantoms they were the first to cite."		I observe that rule #3 states: "Scholars shall neither cite themselves, nor write phantoms they were the first to cite."

−	I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous ~~Manuscripts~~]] cites Melderson.	+	I mention this because your entry on [[Luminous manuscript]] cites Melderson.