Ghyll talk:Last witness - Revision history

Undrhil: * Am I allowed to Resolve talk entries for my own articles? *

2005-08-15T03:23:27Z

* Am I allowed to Resolve talk entries for my own articles? *

Undrhil: * Answer *

2005-08-14T06:54:21Z

* Answer *

Lady Aleksandra Quininery: quick spelling/vocab question

2005-08-14T01:11:39Z

quick spelling/vocab question

New page

So while I'm nitpicking the spelling -- did you use "habitants" on purpose for its slightly out-of-the-ordinary flavor, or should it be "inhabitants?" --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra]] 21:11, 13 Aug 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:23, 15 August 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	So while I'm nitpicking the spelling -- did you use "habitants" on purpose for its slightly out-of-the-ordinary flavor, or should it be "inhabitants?" --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra]] 21:11, 13 Aug 2005 (EDT)	+	{{ResolvedTalk}}
−
−	:I used 'habitants' on accident. I'm still not sure how I was able to keep reading over it and never seeing that. But I suppose I could have left it as it was, it would just cause more confusion as more people would read it and wonder if I had made a misspelling or not. And, eventually, some overzealous scholar would change it to 'inhabitants' without a second glance. :) --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 02:54, 14 Aug 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:54, 14 August 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	So while I'm nitpicking the spelling -- did you use "habitants" on purpose for its slightly out-of-the-ordinary flavor, or should it be "inhabitants?" --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra]] 21:11, 13 Aug 2005 (EDT)		So while I'm nitpicking the spelling -- did you use "habitants" on purpose for its slightly out-of-the-ordinary flavor, or should it be "inhabitants?" --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra]] 21:11, 13 Aug 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I used 'habitants' on accident. I'm still not sure how I was able to keep reading over it and never seeing that. But I suppose I could have left it as it was, it would just cause more confusion as more people would read it and wonder if I had made a misspelling or not. And, eventually, some overzealous scholar would change it to 'inhabitants' without a second glance. :) --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 02:54, 14 Aug 2005 (EDT)