Ghyll talk:Gyll Hill - Revision history

Morbus Iff: Resolved.

2005-07-06T01:30:59Z

Resolved.

Morbus Iff at 03:56, 31 October 2004

2004-10-31T03:56:19Z

Sbp: Introducting: The Paragraph. A very useful writing tool.

2004-10-30T20:37:28Z

Introducting: The Paragraph. A very useful writing tool.

Morbus Iff at 13:19, 30 October 2004

2004-10-30T13:19:52Z

Sbp: No self-citing, right...

2004-10-30T12:54:15Z

No self-citing, right...

Sbp: Explanation for edits.

2004-10-30T12:50:57Z

Explanation for edits.

New page

I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well.

Other edits--raucously (typo), and Ecstasy (misspelling)--fine, and ''The'' Folktown Records is a good catch.

--[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:30, 6 July 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well. Other edits--raucously (typo), and Ecstasy (misspelling)--fine, and ''The'' Folktown Records is a good catch. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)	+	{{ResolvedTalk}}
−
−	~~Whoops, just saw this:~~
−
−	~~<pre>~~
−	~~<Morbus> you cited CHS as your previous, but you defined that one.~~
−	~~<Morbus> perm to change to Folktown Records?~~
−	~~</pre>~~
−
−	~~and reverting. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:54, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)~~

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well.
+I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well. Other edits--raucously (typo), and Ecstasy (misspelling)--fine, and ''The'' Folktown Records is a good catch. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)
 Whoops, just saw this:
@@ Line 12: / Line 8: @@
 </pre>
-and reverting.
+and reverting. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:54, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well. Other edits--raucously (typo), and Ecstasy (misspelling)--fine, and ''The'' Folktown Records is a good catch. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)
+I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well.
 Whoops, just saw this:
@@ Line 8: / Line 12: @@
 </pre>
-and reverting. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:54, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)
+and reverting.

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well.
+I actually changed "privy" to "privvy" in the page's drafting, so it's [sic]: I wanted to indicate a slightly different sense of privy. As to why Morbus changed my citation from one perfectly valid link (Cranee) to another (Folktown) not selected by the author I've no idea, but I've changed it back. The "we may very well be getting to..." quote could well have been prefixed with "In actual fact," or something along those lines in the interview, so leading with a lowercase "w" is acceptable. Even if not, I prefer to interpolate the lower case letter thus: "[w]e may very well be getting to...", though I keep thinking a change-diacritic would be less intrusive. Oh well. Other edits--raucously (typo), and Ecstasy (misspelling)--fine, and ''The'' Folktown Records is a good catch. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)
 Whoops, just saw this:
@@ Line 12: / Line 8: @@
 </pre>
-and reverting.
+and reverting. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:54, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:54, 30 October 2004
Line 4:		Line 4:

	--[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)		--[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:50, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)
		+
		+	Whoops, just saw this:
		+
		+	<pre>
		+	<Morbus> you cited CHS as your previous, but you defined that one.
		+	<Morbus> perm to change to Folktown Records?
		+	</pre>
		+
		+	and reverting.
		+
		+	--[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 08:54, 30 Oct 2004 (EDT)