Ghyll talk:Great Awakening - Revision history

Morbus Iff: Resolved.

2005-07-06T01:29:31Z

Resolved.

Dfaran L'Eniarc: ...A misunderstanding on my part.

2005-06-30T04:32:13Z

...A misunderstanding on my part.

Dfaran L'Eniarc: Bit of a misunderstanding here, I think

2005-06-30T04:31:20Z

Bit of a misunderstanding here, I think

Morbus Iff: I'm tending to agree with the cowanator.

2005-06-29T12:56:53Z

I'm tending to agree with the cowanator.

Jcowan: No, it's good!

2005-06-29T12:32:36Z

No, it's good!

AaronSw at 05:44, 29 June 2005

2005-06-29T05:44:36Z

New page

Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. [[User:AaronSw|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 01:29, 6 July 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. --[[User:AaronSw\|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)~~	+	{{ResolvedTalk}}
−
−	:I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece. However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem). You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the [[Ghyll Phantom Index]] to find one that's appropriate. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
−
−	:I also think you're beating up on yourself. And, the quickest thing to do is just to switch out one of your newly-created phantoms with [[quiver-n-bend]]. I kinda prefer Eriq Tali, but it's your call. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 08:56, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
−
−	~~:Intellectuals' Conspiracy isn't a new phantom. I created it in Deathood.~~
−	~~Oh, wait, I see now. Nevermind. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 00:31, 30 Jun 2005 (EDT)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:32, 30 June 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:I also think you're beating up on yourself. And, the quickest thing to do is just to switch out one of your newly-created phantoms with [[quiver-n-bend]]. I kinda prefer Eriq Tali, but it's your call. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 08:56, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)		:I also think you're beating up on yourself. And, the quickest thing to do is just to switch out one of your newly-created phantoms with [[quiver-n-bend]]. I kinda prefer Eriq Tali, but it's your call. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 08:56, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)

−	:Intellectuals' Conspiracy isn't a new phantom. I created it in Deathood. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 00:31, 30 Jun 2005 (EDT)	+	:Intellectuals' Conspiracy isn't a new phantom. I created it in Deathood.
		+	Oh, wait, I see now. Nevermind. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 00:31, 30 Jun 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:31, 30 June 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	:I also think you're beating up on yourself. And, the quickest thing to do is just to switch out one of your newly-created phantoms with [[quiver-n-bend]]. I kinda prefer Eriq Tali, but it's your call. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 08:56, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)		:I also think you're beating up on yourself. And, the quickest thing to do is just to switch out one of your newly-created phantoms with [[quiver-n-bend]]. I kinda prefer Eriq Tali, but it's your call. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 08:56, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:Intellectuals' Conspiracy isn't a new phantom. I created it in Deathood. --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc\|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 00:31, 30 Jun 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:56, 29 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. [[User:AaronSw\|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)	+	Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. --[[User:AaronSw\|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)

−	:I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece. However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem). You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the [[Phantom Index]] to find one that's appropriate. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)	+	:I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece. However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem). You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the [[Ghyll Phantom Index]] to find one that's appropriate. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I also think you're beating up on yourself. And, the quickest thing to do is just to switch out one of your newly-created phantoms with [[quiver-n-bend]]. I kinda prefer Eriq Tali, but it's your call. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 08:56, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:32, 29 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. [[User:AaronSw\|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)		Apologies for writing this page. I see now that it was a rather bad idea. Feel free to delete it and try again. [[User:AaronSw\|AaronSw]] 01:44, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:I don't agree; I think this is a fine piece. However, under current rules you cannot create two novel phantoms; you must pick one (you can have a new concept that isn't a phantom, so that's no problem). You must also cite another, already created phantom; use the [[Phantom Index]] to find one that's appropriate. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 08:32, 29 Jun 2005 (EDT)