Ghyll talk:Conflict That Is Not Happening - Revision history

Jcowan: Fixing my name

2005-06-12T03:29:30Z

Fixing my name

2005-06-12T03:18:58Z

Fixing my name

2005-02-17T16:17:44Z

Fixed serious blunder

2004-09-24T18:11:14Z

2004-09-24T18:03:16Z

2004-09-24T15:20:12Z

props, and a threat at imitation

2004-09-24T14:07:58Z

Author's out-of-game comments

New page

This was my first attempt at a comprehensive survey article. --[[User:Jcowan|Jcowan]] 10:07, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:29, 12 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	This was my first attempt at a comprehensive survey article. --[[User:Jcowan\|~~Jcowan~~]] 10:07, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)	+	This was my first attempt at a comprehensive survey article. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 10:07, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)

	I ''really'' like this style- it really brings out the best in the game. Thanks for the example (and I hope you don't mind if I lift it :) --[[User:Joe Bowers\|Joe Bowers]] 11:20, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)		I ''really'' like this style- it really brings out the best in the game. Thanks for the example (and I hope you don't mind if I lift it :) --[[User:Joe Bowers\|Joe Bowers]] 11:20, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 03:18, 12 June 2005
Line 7:		Line 7:
	== Fixed serious blunder ==		== Fixed serious blunder ==

−	I had originally written of "the foolish notion of Oblibestircus" etc. etc., because Oblibestircus was already established in [[Aquentravalkeration]] as a foolish scholar. But it's [[Rancticirchiretic]] who believes in a connection between aquentravalkeration and the [[Paramount Queen]]s. So I corrected the former to the latter here (this does not result in any global conflicts): even someone as brilliant as R. can be allowed one or two foolish notions per lifetime! --[[User:Jcowan\|~~Jcowan~~]] 11:17, 17 Feb 2005 (EST)	+	I had originally written of "the foolish notion of Oblibestircus" etc. etc., because Oblibestircus was already established in [[Aquentravalkeration]] as a foolish scholar. But it's [[Rancticirchiretic]] who believes in a connection between aquentravalkeration and the [[Paramount Queen]]s. So I corrected the former to the latter here (this does not result in any global conflicts): even someone as brilliant as R. can be allowed one or two foolish notions per lifetime! --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 11:17, 17 Feb 2005 (EST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:17, 17 February 2005
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Bravo. Excellent article, and fantastic coverage. Many points made are sure to generate debate for many moons. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 14:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)		Bravo. Excellent article, and fantastic coverage. Many points made are sure to generate debate for many moons. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 14:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)
		+
		+	== Fixed serious blunder ==
		+
		+	I had originally written of "the foolish notion of Oblibestircus" etc. etc., because Oblibestircus was already established in [[Aquentravalkeration]] as a foolish scholar. But it's [[Rancticirchiretic]] who believes in a connection between aquentravalkeration and the [[Paramount Queen]]s. So I corrected the former to the latter here (this does not result in any global conflicts): even someone as brilliant as R. can be allowed one or two foolish notions per lifetime! --[[User:Jcowan\|Jcowan]] 11:17, 17 Feb 2005 (EST)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 This was my first attempt at a comprehensive survey article. --[[User:Jcowan|Jcowan]] 10:07, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)
+I ''really'' like this style- it really brings out the best in the game. Thanks for the example (and I hope you don't mind if I lift it :) --[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]] 11:20, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)
 Bravo. Excellent article, and fantastic coverage. Many points made are sure to generate debate for many moons. --[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]] 14:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:03, 24 September 2004
Line 3:		Line 3:

	I <em>Really</em> like this style- it really brings out the best in the game. Thanks for the example (and I hope you don't mind if I lift it :) --[[User:Joe Bowers\|Joe Bowers]] 11:20, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)		I <em>Really</em> like this style- it really brings out the best in the game. Thanks for the example (and I hope you don't mind if I lift it :) --[[User:Joe Bowers\|Joe Bowers]] 11:20, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)
		+
		+	Bravo. Excellent article, and fantastic coverage. Many points made are sure to generate debate for many moons. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 14:03, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:20, 24 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	This was my first attempt at a comprehensive survey article. --[[User:Jcowan\|Jcowan]] 10:07, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)		This was my first attempt at a comprehensive survey article. --[[User:Jcowan\|Jcowan]] 10:07, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)
		+
		+
		+	I <em>Really</em> like this style- it really brings out the best in the game. Thanks for the example (and I hope you don't mind if I lift it :) --[[User:Joe Bowers\|Joe Bowers]] 11:20, 24 Sep 2004 (EDT)