Ghyll talk:Cadaver, The - Revision history

Morbus Iff: Using the new ResolvedTalk template for whitespaced pages.

2005-05-13T20:14:34Z

Using the new ResolvedTalk template for whitespaced pages.

Jcowan: Removing obsolete discussion.

2005-04-27T15:36:36Z

Removing obsolete discussion.

Sh1mmer at 22:03, 21 September 2004

2004-09-21T22:03:05Z

Morbus Iff: Note removed from the entry; sent to the Talk: instead.

2004-09-21T15:00:20Z

Note removed from the entry; sent to the Talk: instead.

Morbus Iff: It was a lot smaller when the note was added, dear boy.

2004-09-21T14:58:05Z

It was a lot smaller when the note was added, dear boy.

DrBacchus: Meet me at The Cadaver for an Adlorst

2004-09-21T14:23:37Z

Meet me at The Cadaver for an Adlorst

New page

Dearest Morbus,

Pffffft.

Let the article wend its merry way. This is a cool article. Having a gathering place which is famous enough to warrant an encyclopedia entry is great. It's destined to become the gathering place of famous authors, the location of famous card games, and the meeting place of clandestine conspiracies. Let it run its course. I'm looking forward to seeing how it turns out, as both the commemoration of an important historical event, and as a social center of the savory and unsavory sets.

I won't repeat points already made in the Cranee discussion, since that would be beating a dead aelphant.

Let the clay take shape before you cast it down from the potter's wheel.

--[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]] 10:23, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:14, 13 May 2005
Line 1:	Line 1:
−	+	{{ResolvedTalk}}

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:36, 27 April 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Dearest Morbus, Pffffft. Let the article wend its merry way. This is a cool article. Having a gathering place which is famous enough to warrant an encyclopedia entry is great. It's destined to become the gathering place of famous authors, the location of famous card games, and the meeting place of clandestine conspiracies. Let it run its course. I'm looking forward to seeing how it turns out, as both the commemoration of an important historical event, and as a social center of the savory and unsavory sets. I won't repeat points already made in the Cranee discussion, since that would be beating a dead aelphant. Let the clay take shape before you cast it down from the potter's wheel. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 10:23, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)

−	The article was only two sentences when I added the comment - it was a cautionary note only. The note has since been removed, but has been archived here for contextual reasons: ''Cautionary Note: There is a good chance this entry will be possibly removed, or asked to be heavily edited, unless it is linked into existing locations (hi sh1mmer - i love you!). I realize this entry is still in its early stages, and thus prompted this possible preempting of a fallible future (ha!). There are too many people creating "nameitis" things, be it people, locations, political groups, cults, religions, etc., and they're starting to overpower everything else; the Lexicon is about integration, not pockets of existence. An authoritative version of this comment, and thus a "house rule", will be issued sometime soon.'' --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 10:58, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)
−
−	So, I thought I would try and expirment which streches the rules a little in this one. I am going to express some of the political bias on my player character in this entry. I will put bias in italics to make it easier to identify for now. I hope people will latch on and comment in the article about what an inept scholar and unrepresentative bounder the [[user:sh1mmer\|despicable shimmy]] is. --[[User:sh1mmer\|Despicable Shimmy]] 23:00, 21 Sep 2004 (BST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:03, 21 September 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	The article was only two sentences when I added the comment - it was a cautionary note only. The note has since been removed, but has been archived here for contextual reasons: ''Cautionary Note: There is a good chance this entry will be possibly removed, or asked to be heavily edited, unless it is linked into existing locations (hi sh1mmer - i love you!). I realize this entry is still in its early stages, and thus prompted this possible preempting of a fallible future (ha!). There are too many people creating "nameitis" things, be it people, locations, political groups, cults, religions, etc., and they're starting to overpower everything else; the Lexicon is about integration, not pockets of existence. An authoritative version of this comment, and thus a "house rule", will be issued sometime soon.'' --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 10:58, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)		The article was only two sentences when I added the comment - it was a cautionary note only. The note has since been removed, but has been archived here for contextual reasons: ''Cautionary Note: There is a good chance this entry will be possibly removed, or asked to be heavily edited, unless it is linked into existing locations (hi sh1mmer - i love you!). I realize this entry is still in its early stages, and thus prompted this possible preempting of a fallible future (ha!). There are too many people creating "nameitis" things, be it people, locations, political groups, cults, religions, etc., and they're starting to overpower everything else; the Lexicon is about integration, not pockets of existence. An authoritative version of this comment, and thus a "house rule", will be issued sometime soon.'' --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 10:58, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)
		+
		+	So, I thought I would try and expirment which streches the rules a little in this one. I am going to express some of the political bias on my player character in this entry. I will put bias in italics to make it easier to identify for now. I hope people will latch on and comment in the article about what an inept scholar and unrepresentative bounder the [[user:sh1mmer\|despicable shimmy]] is. --[[User:sh1mmer\|Despicable Shimmy]] 23:00, 21 Sep 2004 (BST)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:00, 21 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Dearest Morbus,	+	Dearest Morbus, Pffffft. Let the article wend its merry way. This is a cool article. Having a gathering place which is famous enough to warrant an encyclopedia entry is great. It's destined to become the gathering place of famous authors, the location of famous card games, and the meeting place of clandestine conspiracies. Let it run its course. I'm looking forward to seeing how it turns out, as both the commemoration of an important historical event, and as a social center of the savory and unsavory sets. I won't repeat points already made in the Cranee discussion, since that would be beating a dead aelphant. Let the clay take shape before you cast it down from the potter's wheel. --[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 10:23, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)

−	~~Pffffft.~~	+	The article was only two sentences when I added the comment - it was a cautionary note only. The note has since been removed, but has been archived here for contextual reasons: ''Cautionary Note: There is a good chance this entry will be possibly removed, or asked to be heavily edited, unless it is linked into existing locations (hi sh1mmer - i love you!). I realize this entry is still in its early stages, and thus prompted this possible preempting of a fallible future (ha!). There are too many people creating "nameitis" things, be it people, locations, political groups, cults, religions, etc., and they're starting to overpower everything else; the Lexicon is about integration, not pockets of existence. An authoritative version of this comment, and thus a "house rule", will be issued sometime soon.'' --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 10:58, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)
−
−	~~Let~~ the ~~article wend its merry way~~. ~~This~~ is a ~~cool article~~. ~~Having a gathering place which is famous enough to warrant an encyclopedia~~ entry is ~~great. It's destined to become the gathering place of famous authors, the location of famous card games~~, and ~~the meeting place~~ of ~~clandestine conspiracies~~. ~~Let~~ it ~~run its course~~. I'~~m looking forward~~ to ~~seeing how it turns out~~, ~~as both the commemoration~~ of ~~an important historical event~~, and as a ~~social center of the savory and unsavory sets.~~
−
−	~~I won't repeat points already made in the Cranee discussion~~, ~~since that would~~ be ~~beating a dead aelphant~~.
−
−	~~Let the clay take shape before you cast it down from the potter~~'~~s wheel.~~
−
−	~~--[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 10:23, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)~~
−
−	~~The article was only two sentences when I added the comment - it was a cautionary note only.~~ --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 10:58, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:58, 21 September 2004
Line 10:		Line 10:

	--[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 10:23, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)		--[[User:DrBacchus\|DrBacchus]] 10:23, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)
		+
		+	The article was only two sentences when I added the comment - it was a cautionary note only. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 10:58, 21 Sep 2004 (EDT)