Ghyll talk:Bordingbras his hatt! - Revision history

Morbus Iff: Always, always. I can never escape the tedium.

2005-05-31T13:53:44Z

Always, always. I can never escape the tedium.

Morbus Iff: Styling tweaks.

2005-05-31T13:53:27Z

Styling tweaks.

Morbus Iff: Signing comments for people. /me grumbles.

2004-09-23T19:27:05Z

Signing comments for people. /me grumbles.

Jcowan: X his Y

2004-09-23T19:00:34Z

X his Y

Juzh Iruk at 00:07, 19 September 2004

2004-09-19T00:07:29Z

Juzh Iruk at 00:07, 19 September 2004

2004-09-19T00:07:12Z

Sbp: Ååååååh-åhåhåhåh! Vinna kinky roligt, vinna kinky roligt. Hatten är din, hatten är din. Hatt-baby! Hatt-baby!

2004-09-18T14:01:12Z

Ååååååh-åhåhåhåh! Vinna kinky roligt, vinna kinky roligt. Hatten är din, hatten är din. Hatt-baby! Hatt-baby!

Sbp: Question for Juzh Iruk.

2004-09-18T09:09:58Z

Question for Juzh Iruk.

New page

Juzh Iruk: I think that of all the entry names so far, this is my favourite, and it makes me wonder where you got it from. I guess that "Bordingbras" is a sub-conscious derivation of "Fortinbras" from Hamlet, but I'm not quite sure about the "his hatt!" part and the strange grammar, though it reminds me of something. Could you possibly explain? Good stuff. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:09, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:53, 31 May 2005
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Lol, I'm not entirely sure. I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet. This was all there was, so I ran with it. Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]]. --[[User:Juzh Iruk\|Juzh Iruk]] 20:07, 18 Sep 2004		:Lol, I'm not entirely sure. I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet. This was all there was, so I ran with it. Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]]. --[[User:Juzh Iruk\|Juzh Iruk]] 20:07, 18 Sep 2004

−	The form "X his Y" (as in "George his book") was used in the English of the 14th-16th centuries, based on the then-current belief that "John's book" (usually pronounced with two syllables in "John's" in those days) was actually an abbreviation for a supposed earlier form which was being restored. Historically this is incorrect, as a comparison with German genitives like "Georgs Buch" will show. Its use here is perhaps meant to suggest a corresponding kind of archaism or pseudo-archaism. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan] 15:00, 23 Sep 2004	+	The form "X his Y" (as in "George his book") was used in the English of the 14th-16th centuries, based on the then-current belief that "John's book" (usually pronounced with two syllables in "John's" in those days) was actually an abbreviation for a supposed earlier form which was being restored. Historically this is incorrect, as a comparison with German genitives like "Georgs Buch" will show. Its use here is perhaps meant to suggest a corresponding kind of archaism or pseudo-archaism. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 15:00, 23 Sep 2004

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Ginestre: I think that of all the entry names so far, this is my favourite, and it makes me wonder where you got it from. I guess that "Bordingbras" is a sub-conscious derivation of "Fortinbras" from Hamlet, but I'm not quite sure about the "his hatt!" part and the strange grammar, though it reminds me of something. Perhaps the "hatt" part is from "Hatt-Baby"? Could you possibly explain? Good stuff. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:09, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)
-Lol, I'm not entirely sure.  I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet.  This was all there was, so I ran with it.  Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]]. --[[User:Juzh Iruk|Juzh Iruk]] 20:07, 18 Sep 2004
+:Lol, I'm not entirely sure.  I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet.  This was all there was, so I ran with it.  Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]]. --[[User:Juzh Iruk|Juzh Iruk]] 20:07, 18 Sep 2004
-== X his Y ==
+The form "X his Y" (as in "George his book") was used in the English of the 14th-16th centuries, based on the then-current belief that "John's book" (usually pronounced with two syllables in "John's" in those days) was actually an abbreviation for a supposed earlier form which was being restored.  Historically this is incorrect, as a comparison with German genitives like "Georgs Buch" will show.  Its use here is perhaps meant to suggest a corresponding kind of archaism or pseudo-archaism. --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan] 15:00, 23 Sep 2004

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 Ginestre: I think that of all the entry names so far, this is my favourite, and it makes me wonder where you got it from. I guess that "Bordingbras" is a sub-conscious derivation of "Fortinbras" from Hamlet, but I'm not quite sure about the "his hatt!" part and the strange grammar, though it reminds me of something. Perhaps the "hatt" part is from "Hatt-Baby"? Could you possibly explain? Good stuff. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:09, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)
-Lol, I'm not entirely sure.  I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet.  This was all there was, so I ran with it.  Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]].
+Lol, I'm not entirely sure.  I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet.  This was all there was, so I ran with it.  Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]]. --[[User:Juzh Iruk|Juzh Iruk]] 20:07, 18 Sep 2004
 == X his Y ==
-The form "X his Y" (as in "George his book") was used in the English of the 14th-16th centuries, based on the then-current belief that "John's book" (usually pronounced with two syllables in "John's" in those days) was actually an abbreviation for a supposed earlier form which was being restored.  Historically this is incorrect, as a comparison with German genitives like "Georgs Buch" will show.  Its use here is perhaps meant to suggest a corresponding kind of archaism or pseudo-archaism.
+The form "X his Y" (as in "George his book") was used in the English of the 14th-16th centuries, based on the then-current belief that "John's book" (usually pronounced with two syllables in "John's" in those days) was actually an abbreviation for a supposed earlier form which was being restored.  Historically this is incorrect, as a comparison with German genitives like "Georgs Buch" will show.  Its use here is perhaps meant to suggest a corresponding kind of archaism or pseudo-archaism. --[[User:Jcowan|Jcowan]] 15:00, 23 Sep 2004

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:00, 23 September 2004
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Lol, I'm not entirely sure. I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet. This was all there was, so I ran with it. Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]].		Lol, I'm not entirely sure. I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet. This was all there was, so I ran with it. Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]].
		+
		+	== X his Y ==
		+
		+	The form "X his Y" (as in "George his book") was used in the English of the 14th-16th centuries, based on the then-current belief that "John's book" (usually pronounced with two syllables in "John's" in those days) was actually an abbreviation for a supposed earlier form which was being restored. Historically this is incorrect, as a comparison with German genitives like "Georgs Buch" will show. Its use here is perhaps meant to suggest a corresponding kind of archaism or pseudo-archaism.

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:07, 19 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Ginestre: I think that of all the entry names so far, this is my favourite, and it makes me wonder where you got it from. I guess that "Bordingbras" is a sub-conscious derivation of "Fortinbras" from Hamlet, but I'm not quite sure about the "his hatt!" part and the strange grammar, though it reminds me of something. Perhaps the "hatt" part is from "Hatt-Baby"? Could you possibly explain? Good stuff. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:09, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)		Ginestre: I think that of all the entry names so far, this is my favourite, and it makes me wonder where you got it from. I guess that "Bordingbras" is a sub-conscious derivation of "Fortinbras" from Hamlet, but I'm not quite sure about the "his hatt!" part and the strange grammar, though it reminds me of something. Perhaps the "hatt" part is from "Hatt-Baby"? Could you possibly explain? Good stuff. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:09, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)

−	Lol, I'm not entirely sure. I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet. This was all there was, so I ran with it. [[Ginestre]] is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]].	+	Lol, I'm not entirely sure. I just went to the phantom page to see if anything wasn't taken yet. This was all there was, so I ran with it. Ginestre is the one who thought it up in [[Battle of Barnum Stones]].

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:01, 18 September 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~Juzh Iruk~~: I think that of all the entry names so far, this is my favourite, and it makes me wonder where you got it from. I guess that "Bordingbras" is a sub-conscious derivation of "Fortinbras" from Hamlet, but I'm not quite sure about the "his hatt!" part and the strange grammar, though it reminds me of something. Could you possibly explain? Good stuff. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:09, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)	+	Ginestre: I think that of all the entry names so far, this is my favourite, and it makes me wonder where you got it from. I guess that "Bordingbras" is a sub-conscious derivation of "Fortinbras" from Hamlet, but I'm not quite sure about the "his hatt!" part and the strange grammar, though it reminds me of something. Perhaps the "hatt" part is from "Hatt-Baby"? Could you possibly explain? Good stuff. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 05:09, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)