Ghyll talk:Baron Claude Lloyd Albert Smallwood - Revision history

Morbus Iff: Removing ancient OOG header.

2005-05-31T13:48:52Z

Removing ancient OOG header.

Jcowan: Removed obsolete discussion

2004-10-14T13:31:23Z

Removed obsolete discussion

Sbp: Doing a Morbus.

2004-09-12T22:26:39Z

Doing a Morbus.

PhineasCrank at 20:47, 12 September 2004

2004-09-12T20:47:02Z

PhineasCrank: Right, then, updated

2004-09-12T20:46:35Z

Right, then, updated

PhineasCrank: Damn you and your logic! ^_^

2004-09-12T17:58:56Z

Damn you and your logic! ^_^

Morbus Iff: These heading things drive me batty .

2004-09-12T15:39:34Z

These heading things drive me batty <g>.

Jcowan: How the devil...

2004-09-12T15:28:32Z

How the devil...

Morbus Iff: Inferences based on his choice of citations and blah blah.

2004-09-12T13:43:34Z

Inferences based on his choice of citations and blah blah.

New page

==Out-Of-Game Discussion==

Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry, but please note that it has too many citations: you're meant to reference only ''one'' existing one, and ''two'' new entries (i.e. phantom entries), but you've listed several. The rationale is that if we define too many phantom entries, it's going to be impossible for us to catch up in subsequent turns. Please pick just one existing one, and two new ones. No need to change the body of your entry, just the '''Citations''' bit at the bottom -- we'll do the rest. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:48, 31 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~==Out-Of-Game Discussion==~~
−
	Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)		Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:31, 14 October 2004
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==Out-Of-Game Discussion==		==Out-Of-Game Discussion==

−	Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry, but please note that it has too many citations: you're meant to reference only ''one'' existing one, and ''two'' new entries (i.e. phantom entries), but you've listed several. The rationale is that if we define too many phantom entries, it's going to be impossible for us to catch up in subsequent turns. Please pick just one existing one, and two new ones. No need to change the body of your entry, just the '''Citations''' bit at the bottom -- we'll do the rest. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49~~, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)~~	+	Phineas: Welcome to Ghyll! Thanks for a good entry. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 00:49, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)
−
−	Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)
−
−	How the devil can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 1:28, 12 Sep 2004
−
−	See what happens when I do this with a hangover?! Morbus was quite correct in his assumptions. My mistake was in the misinterpretation of the rules on '''Citations'''. I appreciate the correction. I was a bit rushed into this as I joined just in time to make the first deadline. My apologies for not reading all the FAQs well enough.
−	~~As to the fuzzy ritual reference... Well, as always, Mr. Cowan was correct and I have corrected myself. Hopefully, it is more clear now.~~
−	~~--[[User:PhineasCrank\|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 13:01, 12 Sep 2004~~
−
−	~~Right, I think I've corrected all my title lacking entries, but if anyone sees one I've missed, please, feel free to correct it.~~
−	~~--[[User:PhineasCrank\|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:46~~, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 --[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 13:01, 12 Sep 2004
-Right, I think I've correctd all my title lacking entries, but if anyone sees one I've missed, please, feel free to correct it.
+Right, I think I've corrected all my title lacking entries, but if anyone sees one I've missed, please, feel free to correct it.
 --[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:46, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:47, 12 September 2004
Line 12:		Line 12:

	Right, I think I've correctd all my title lacking entries, but if anyone sees one I've missed, please, feel free to correct it.		Right, I think I've correctd all my title lacking entries, but if anyone sees one I've missed, please, feel free to correct it.
−	--[[User:PhineasCrank\|~~PhineasCrank~~]] 16:46, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)	+	--[[User:PhineasCrank\|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 16:46, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:46, 12 September 2004
Line 10:		Line 10:
	As to the fuzzy ritual reference... Well, as always, Mr. Cowan was correct and I have corrected myself. Hopefully, it is more clear now.		As to the fuzzy ritual reference... Well, as always, Mr. Cowan was correct and I have corrected myself. Hopefully, it is more clear now.
	--[[User:PhineasCrank\|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 13:01, 12 Sep 2004		--[[User:PhineasCrank\|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 13:01, 12 Sep 2004
		+
		+	Right, I think I've correctd all my title lacking entries, but if anyone sees one I've missed, please, feel free to correct it.
		+	--[[User:PhineasCrank\|PhineasCrank]] 16:46, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 17:58, 12 September 2004
Line 6:		Line 6:

	How the devil can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 1:28, 12 Sep 2004		How the devil can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 1:28, 12 Sep 2004
		+
		+	See what happens when I do this with a hangover?! Morbus was quite correct in his assumptions. My mistake was in the misinterpretation of the rules on '''Citations'''. I appreciate the correction. I was a bit rushed into this as I joined just in time to make the first deadline. My apologies for not reading all the FAQs well enough.
		+	As to the fuzzy ritual reference... Well, as always, Mr. Cowan was correct and I have corrected myself. Hopefully, it is more clear now.
		+	--[[User:PhineasCrank\|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 13:01, 12 Sep 2004

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:39, 12 September 2004
Line 5:		Line 5:
	Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)		Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)

−	== How the devil~~... ==~~	+	How the devil can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 1:28, 12 Sep 2004
−
−	can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none.

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:28, 12 September 2004
Line 4:		Line 4:

	Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)		Solely because I'm impatient, I am inferring the following: All existing phantoms were meant to be his "I met my requirements, and thus, I'm citing extra" and non-existing phantoms were meant to be his required citations. Finally, to integrate "more", I'm choosing Bavarian Creame as his per-turn existing, simply because it's more linky loo than the originating Adlorst Vinefera. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 09:43, 12 Sep 2004 (EDT)
		+
		+	== How the devil... ==
		+
		+	can a ritual be at once "observed by many" and "in private"? The very essence of something being done in private is that it is observed by few or none.