Ghyll talk:Articulary Motion - Revision history

Morbus Iff: Resolved.

2005-06-06T13:39:37Z

Resolved.

Undrhil: * Okie dokey *

2005-05-24T12:16:04Z

* Okie dokey *

Morbus Iff: You've made the same error on your new B entry.

2005-05-24T11:27:01Z

You've made the same error on your new B entry.

Morbus Iff: Only one new phantom per turn.

2005-05-24T11:26:06Z

Only one new phantom per turn.

Undrhil: * Why did my phantom go bye-bye? *

2005-05-24T05:29:01Z

* Why did my phantom go bye-bye? *

New page

OK, I don't understand why you removed my phantom of Ralph Neocronin? I thought I could pen out two phantoms and then cite a pre-existing phantom? Was I wrong in that thought? --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:29, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:39, 6 June 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	OK, I don't understand why you removed my phantom of Ralph Neocronin? I thought I could pen out two phantoms and then cite a pre-existing phantom? Was I wrong in that thought? --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:29, 24 May 2005 (EDT)	+	{{ResolvedTalk}}
−
−	:You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one ''new'' phantom and one ''existing'' phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two ''new'' phantoms you had made. You've made the same error over on your B entry. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
−
−	~~::Ah ... I guess I misunderstood that. Ok, well, I have corrected the B entry and I guess you did alright with this one. :-D --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 08:16, 24 May 2005 (EDT)~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:16, 24 May 2005
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one ''new'' phantom and one ''existing'' phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two ''new'' phantoms you had made. You've made the same error over on your B entry. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT)		:You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one ''new'' phantom and one ''existing'' phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two ''new'' phantoms you had made. You've made the same error over on your B entry. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	::Ah ... I guess I misunderstood that. Ok, well, I have corrected the B entry and I guess you did alright with this one. :-D --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 08:16, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:27, 24 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	OK, I don't understand why you removed my phantom of Ralph Neocronin? I thought I could pen out two phantoms and then cite a pre-existing phantom? Was I wrong in that thought? --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:29, 24 May 2005 (EDT)		OK, I don't understand why you removed my phantom of Ralph Neocronin? I thought I could pen out two phantoms and then cite a pre-existing phantom? Was I wrong in that thought? --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:29, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

−	:You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one ''new'' phantom and one ''existing'' phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two ''new'' phantoms you had made. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT)	+	:You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one ''new'' phantom and one ''existing'' phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two ''new'' phantoms you had made. You've made the same error over on your B entry. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:26, 24 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	OK, I don't understand why you removed my phantom of Ralph Neocronin? I thought I could pen out two phantoms and then cite a pre-existing phantom? Was I wrong in that thought? --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:29, 24 May 2005 (EDT)		OK, I don't understand why you removed my phantom of Ralph Neocronin? I thought I could pen out two phantoms and then cite a pre-existing phantom? Was I wrong in that thought? --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:29, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:You created two new phantoms when the rules allow you only one ''new'' phantom and one ''existing'' phantom as your official Citations. I chose what I felt was the better of the two ''new'' phantoms you had made. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 07:26, 24 May 2005 (EDT)