Ghyll talk:Arandellion Moors - Revision history

Morbus Iff: Whitespacing and ResolvedTalk.

2005-05-23T22:42:18Z

Whitespacing and ResolvedTalk.

Jcowan: Pointer to updated FAQ.

2005-05-19T04:24:28Z

Pointer to updated FAQ.

Morbus Iff: No apologies necessary!

2005-05-19T03:05:52Z

No apologies necessary!

Kalen Firth at 02:07, 19 May 2005

2005-05-19T02:07:03Z

Kalen Firth at 02:04, 19 May 2005

2005-05-19T02:04:02Z

Morbus Iff: Responding to the citation issue.

2005-05-19T01:07:18Z

Responding to the citation issue.

Kalen Firth at 22:14, 18 May 2005

2005-05-18T22:14:15Z

Jcowan at 12:13, 17 May 2005

2005-05-17T12:13:17Z

New page

'''Only three citations are permitted.''' You can have as many links in the text to existing articles as seem useful, but you can only mention ''one'' existing article in the formal '''Citations:''' footer. --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 08:13, 17 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:42, 23 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	'''Only three citations are permitted.''' You can have as many links in the text to existing articles as seem useful, but you can only mention ''one'' existing article in the formal '''Citations:''' footer. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 08:13, 17 May 2005 (EDT)	+	{{ResolvedTalk}}
−
−	''Can I cite more than I'm required to cite? (cf. Rule 2) Each turn after the first, you're required to cite two phantom entries (which may be existing phantoms, brand new phantoms, or a mixture of both) and one existing entry. For Round 2, you may not cite two brand new phantoms. None of these three citations can be terms you've created or written. However, if you've properly met these requirements, your entry can certainly refer to other terms in the Ghyll encyclopedia, including those you've personally written. These "other terms", however, MUST have been previously defined or created. See the Ghyll Index and the Ghyll Phantom Index, which jointly constitute a complete list of in-play terms.'' Direct quote from the FAQ. Apologies if I misunderstood you or something, but I don't believe you are correct. I am new, so if I messed up somewhere, feel free to denounce me. --[[User:Kalen Firth\|Kalen Firth]] 18:14, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
−
−	:In this case, the FAQ is talking about inline citations. The '''Citations''' footer at the bottom of the entry is "special" and should list ONLY the two phantom citations, and ONE existing citation (typically, the one you feel is "best" related to your entire entry itself). See any of the entries from the first Round for an example. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 21:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
−
−	~~::I've updated the [[FAQ]] to clarify the reference. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 00:24, 19 May 2005 (EDT)~~
−
−	Is that better? I apologize for the Misunderstanding. I must thank you for both the correction of my mispelling and my citations error, and Morbus for correction my error in understanding. --[[User:Kalen Firth\|Kalen Firth]] 22:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
−
−	~~:No apologies necessary! Tis fine now. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 23:05, 18 May 2005 (EDT)~~

@@ Line 4: / Line 4: @@
 :In this case, the FAQ is talking about inline citations. The '''Citations''' footer at the bottom of the entry is "special" and should list ONLY the two phantom citations, and ONE existing citation (typically, the one you feel is "best" related to your entire entry itself). See any of the entries from the first Round for an example. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 21:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
 Is that better? I apologize for the Misunderstanding. I must thank you for both the correction of my mispelling and my citations error, and Morbus for correction my error in understanding. --[[User:Kalen Firth|Kalen Firth]] 22:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
 :No apologies necessary! Tis fine now. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 23:05, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 '''Only three citations are permitted.'''  You can have as many links in the text to existing articles as seem useful, but you can only mention ''one'' existing article in the formal '''Citations:''' footer. --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 08:13, 17 May 2005 (EDT)
-Can I cite more than I'm required to cite? (cf. Rule 2)
+''Can I cite more than I'm required to cite? (cf. Rule 2) Each turn after the first, you're required to cite two phantom entries (which may be existing phantoms, brand new phantoms, or a mixture of both) and one existing entry. For Round 2, you may not cite two brand new phantoms. None of these three citations can be terms you've created or written. However, if you've properly met these requirements, your entry can certainly refer to other terms in the Ghyll encyclopedia, including those you've personally written. These "other terms", however, MUST have been previously defined or created. See the Ghyll Index and the Ghyll Phantom Index, which jointly constitute a complete list of in-play terms.'' Direct quote from the FAQ. Apologies if I misunderstood you or something, but I don't believe you are correct. I am new, so if I messed up somewhere, feel free to denounce me. --[[User:Kalen Firth|Kalen Firth]] 18:14, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
 :In this case, the FAQ is talking about inline citations. The '''Citations''' footer at the bottom of the entry is "special" and should list ONLY the two phantom citations, and ONE existing citation (typically, the one you feel is "best" related to your entire entry itself). See any of the entries from the first Round for an example. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 21:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
-My apologies. I will replace those that I feel are less fit with simply inline Citations.
+Is that better? I apologize for the Misunderstanding. I must thank you for both the correction of my mispelling and my citations error, and Morbus for correction my error in understanding. --[[User:Kalen Firth|Kalen Firth]] 22:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
---[[User:Kalen Firth|Kalen Firth]] 22:04, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
+:No apologies necessary! Tis fine now. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 23:05, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:07, 19 May 2005
Line 9:		Line 9:

	--[[User:Kalen Firth\|Kalen Firth]] 22:04, 18 May 2005 (EDT)		--[[User:Kalen Firth\|Kalen Firth]] 22:04, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	Is that better? I apologize for the Misunderstanding. I must thank you for both the correction of my Mispelling and my citations error, and Morbus for correction my error in understanding.--[[User:Kalen Firth\|Kalen Firth]] 22:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:04, 19 May 2005
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:In this case, the FAQ is talking about inline citations. The '''Citations''' footer at the bottom of the entry is "special" and should list ONLY the two phantom citations, and ONE existing citation (typically, the one you feel is "best" related to your entire entry itself). See any of the entries from the first Round for an example. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 21:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)		:In this case, the FAQ is talking about inline citations. The '''Citations''' footer at the bottom of the entry is "special" and should list ONLY the two phantom citations, and ONE existing citation (typically, the one you feel is "best" related to your entire entry itself). See any of the entries from the first Round for an example. --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 21:07, 18 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	My apologies. I will replace those that I feel are less fit with simply inline Citations.
		+
		+	--[[User:Kalen Firth\|Kalen Firth]] 22:04, 18 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:14, 18 May 2005
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Only three citations are permitted.''' You can have as many links in the text to existing articles as seem useful, but you can only mention ''one'' existing article in the formal '''Citations:''' footer. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 08:13, 17 May 2005 (EDT)		'''Only three citations are permitted.''' You can have as many links in the text to existing articles as seem useful, but you can only mention ''one'' existing article in the formal '''Citations:''' footer. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 08:13, 17 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	Can I cite more than I'm required to cite? (cf. Rule 2)
		+	Each turn after the first, you're required to cite two phantom entries (which may be existing phantoms, brand new phantoms, or a mixture of both) and one existing entry. For Round 2, you may not cite two brand new phantoms. None of these three citations can be terms you've created or written. However, if you've properly met these requirements, your entry can certainly refer to other terms in the Ghyll encyclopedia, including those you've personally written. These "other terms", however, MUST have been previously defined or created. See the Ghyll Index and the Ghyll Phantom Index, which jointly constitute a complete list of in-play terms.
		+
		+	Direct quote from the FAQ.
		+
		+	Apologies if I misunderstood you or something, but I don't believe you are correct. I am new, so if I messed up somewhere, feel free to denounce me.
		+
		+	--[[User:Kalen Firth\|Kalen Firth]] 18:14, 18 May 2005 (EDT)