Ghyll:Zaprosingfrink Gallery - Revision history

Lady Aleksandra Quininery: sig change

2005-06-13T19:54:05Z

sig change

Jcowan: Misspelling

2005-06-01T15:29:57Z

Misspelling

Jcowan: Misspelling removed.

2005-05-17T21:11:05Z

Misspelling removed.

Undrhil: "Medication time, Mr. West." "Ah! My trusty side-kick!"

2005-04-29T04:43:25Z

"Medication time, Mr. West." "Ah! My trusty side-kick!"

DrAckroyd: previously - Scholarly Comment, Later - Typo.

2005-04-29T02:53:58Z

previously - Scholarly Comment, Later - Typo.

DrAckroyd at 02:52, 29 April 2005

2005-04-29T02:52:32Z

Lankin: Arguing. Will be doing this a lot in the future.

2005-04-29T02:27:16Z

Arguing. Will be doing this a lot in the future.

Undrhil: Comments. And the wiki is case-sensitive, apparently...

2005-04-28T22:46:16Z

Comments. And the wiki is case-sensitive, apparently...

Jcowan: Quite.

2005-04-28T18:34:19Z

Quite.

Lady Aleksandra Quininery: others do not share your questionable artistic taste

2005-04-28T07:23:40Z

others do not share your questionable artistic taste

@@ Line 15: / Line 15: @@
 Maybe it's just me, but O'Donnell's daubs make me want to puke.  --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 10:25, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)
-I must beg to differ with your so crudely stated opinion of quite possibly the best artist of our time.  O'Donnell has time and again proved her mastery of the aesthetics and the techniques necessary in the act of creation.  I presume that none of my fellow scholars would be among the ranks of those short-sighted critics who dismiss her work as 'pure plebian shock trollop,'  because there is clearly so much more than the mere incongruency in her work.  O'Donnell's paintings ''speak'' to the viewer, to the arbiterarity and precariousness of our times.  Recall, for example, that beautiful work "Aelfant, Freege Horn and Luscious Pink Grapefruit Section, Still Bloody and Oozing."  Have you ever seen such power, such pathos captured and transmuted so expressively by one artist's hands? --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 03:23, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
+I must beg to differ with your so crudely stated opinion of quite possibly the best artist of our time.  O'Donnell has time and again proved her mastery of the aesthetics and the techniques necessary in the act of creation.  I presume that none of my fellow scholars would be among the ranks of those short-sighted critics who dismiss her work as 'pure plebian shock trollop,'  because there is clearly so much more than the mere incongruency in her work.  O'Donnell's paintings ''speak'' to the viewer, to the arbiterarity and precariousness of our times.  Recall, for example, that beautiful work "Aelfant, Freege Horn and Luscious Pink Grapefruit Section, Still Bloody and Oozing."  Have you ever seen such power, such pathos captured and transmuted so expressively by one artist's hands? --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra]] 03:23, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 Quite.  --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 14:34, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:29, 1 June 2005
Line 25:		Line 25:
	I admit to sitting in the lunchroom of the Zaprosingfrink Gallery during my research for this article and relaxedly contemplating the amusing color juxtaposed against the geometric shape of the condiment packet on the table. I then realized that it was time for my medication and so took my pill before completing the tour. The tour guide was quick to point out that the [[Pyxie]]s were, in fact, not there but that the stuffed [[Tuckarando]] that I was attempting to feed, was. This led me to question whether I should ever trust the hoods who loiter on the corner of my block to go and fill my prescription ever again. In this regard, art has enriched my life tremendously. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 22:52, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)		I admit to sitting in the lunchroom of the Zaprosingfrink Gallery during my research for this article and relaxedly contemplating the amusing color juxtaposed against the geometric shape of the condiment packet on the table. I then realized that it was time for my medication and so took my pill before completing the tour. The tour guide was quick to point out that the [[Pyxie]]s were, in fact, not there but that the stuffed [[Tuckarando]] that I was attempting to feed, was. This led me to question whether I should ever trust the hoods who loiter on the corner of my block to go and fill my prescription ever again. In this regard, art has enriched my life tremendously. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 22:52, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

−	~~Alright~~, I shall withdraw my previous drivel. I suppose it's no use to try to claim it as humor. Someone who has been touched by an immobile object lacking any sort of appendages probably wouldn't understand the humor in my comments, in any case. Although, I must admit that I too am on ''special medication'' part of the time and I do blank out when I am on this medication. I have been told of some exploits, which shall remain unpublished, in which I would probably have talked to [[Aelfants]] had I seen any. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 00:43, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)	+	All right, I shall withdraw my previous drivel. I suppose it's no use to try to claim it as humor. Someone who has been touched by an immobile object lacking any sort of appendages probably wouldn't understand the humor in my comments, in any case. Although, I must admit that I too am on ''special medication'' part of the time and I do blank out when I am on this medication. I have been told of some exploits, which shall remain unpublished, in which I would probably have talked to [[Aelfants]] had I seen any. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 00:43, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
 Quite.  --[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]] 14:34, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
-My dear Lady, if you have paintings ''speaking'' to you, then might I recommend some [[Theoalchemy|theoalchemical]] remedies for your ailments?  Surely you cannot expect us to believe that artwork can have a ''voice''?  This is sheer madness!  Then again, I suppose if a disease such as [[Zygotic Dermatosis]] is in existance, quite anything is possible.  Still, I would hope that you are not quite serious about talking paintings.  --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 18:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
+My dear Lady, if you have paintings ''speaking'' to you, then might I recommend some [[Theoalchemy|theoalchemical]] remedies for your ailments?  Surely you cannot expect us to believe that artwork can have a ''voice''?  This is sheer madness!  Then again, I suppose if a disease such as [[Zygotic Dermatosis]] is in existence, quite anything is possible.  Still, I would hope that you are not quite serious about talking paintings.  --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 18:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
 Once again I am saddened by the lack of artistic appreciation which fills my fellow scholars. How can you not know how it feels when a piece of art reaches out and touches your very soul with its many-colored tentacles of inspiration and understanding? We must always remember that no matter how much dry knowledge we accumulate, no matter how many luminous pages we fill with our droning, it is all dead and in vain if we do not allow beauty spirit and soul to touch our hearts and other internal organs. Anyone so spiritually dead that they have never been moved, or at least nudged, by the art of the likes of O'Donnell should not be allowed to call themselves men (or women) of Knowledge. --[[User:Lankin|Lankin the Mad Mage]] 22:27, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:43, 29 April 2005
Line 24:		Line 24:

	I admit to sitting in the lunchroom of the Zaprosingfrink Gallery during my research for this article and relaxedly contemplating the amusing color juxtaposed against the geometric shape of the condiment packet on the table. I then realized that it was time for my medication and so took my pill before completing the tour. The tour guide was quick to point out that the [[Pyxie]]s were, in fact, not there but that the stuffed [[Tuckarando]] that I was attempting to feed, was. This led me to question whether I should ever trust the hoods who loiter on the corner of my block to go and fill my prescription ever again. In this regard, art has enriched my life tremendously. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 22:52, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)		I admit to sitting in the lunchroom of the Zaprosingfrink Gallery during my research for this article and relaxedly contemplating the amusing color juxtaposed against the geometric shape of the condiment packet on the table. I then realized that it was time for my medication and so took my pill before completing the tour. The tour guide was quick to point out that the [[Pyxie]]s were, in fact, not there but that the stuffed [[Tuckarando]] that I was attempting to feed, was. This led me to question whether I should ever trust the hoods who loiter on the corner of my block to go and fill my prescription ever again. In this regard, art has enriched my life tremendously. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 22:52, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	Alright, I shall withdraw my previous drivel. I suppose it's no use to try to claim it as humor. Someone who has been touched by an immobile object lacking any sort of appendages probably wouldn't understand the humor in my comments, in any case. Although, I must admit that I too am on ''special medication'' part of the time and I do blank out when I am on this medication. I have been told of some exploits, which shall remain unpublished, in which I would probably have talked to [[Aelfants]] had I seen any. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 00:43, 29 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:53, 29 April 2005
Line 23:		Line 23:
	Once again I am saddened by the lack of artistic appreciation which fills my fellow scholars. How can you not know how it feels when a piece of art reaches out and touches your very soul with its many-colored tentacles of inspiration and understanding? We must always remember that no matter how much dry knowledge we accumulate, no matter how many luminous pages we fill with our droning, it is all dead and in vain if we do not allow beauty spirit and soul to touch our hearts and other internal organs. Anyone so spiritually dead that they have never been moved, or at least nudged, by the art of the likes of O'Donnell should not be allowed to call themselves men (or women) of Knowledge. --[[User:Lankin\|Lankin the Mad Mage]] 22:27, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)		Once again I am saddened by the lack of artistic appreciation which fills my fellow scholars. How can you not know how it feels when a piece of art reaches out and touches your very soul with its many-colored tentacles of inspiration and understanding? We must always remember that no matter how much dry knowledge we accumulate, no matter how many luminous pages we fill with our droning, it is all dead and in vain if we do not allow beauty spirit and soul to touch our hearts and other internal organs. Anyone so spiritually dead that they have never been moved, or at least nudged, by the art of the likes of O'Donnell should not be allowed to call themselves men (or women) of Knowledge. --[[User:Lankin\|Lankin the Mad Mage]] 22:27, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

−	I admit to sitting in the lunchroom of the Zaprosingfrink Gallery during my research for this article and relaxedly contemplating the amusing color juxtaposed against the geometric shape of the condiment packet on the table. I then realized that it was time for my medication and so took my pill before completing the tour. The tour guide was quick to point out that the [[~~Pyxies~~]] were, in fact, not there but that the stuffed [[Tuckarando]] that I was attempting to feed, was. This led me to question whether I should ever trust the hoods who loiter on the corner of my block to go and fill my prescription ever again. In this regard, art has enriched my life tremendously. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 22:52, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)	+	I admit to sitting in the lunchroom of the Zaprosingfrink Gallery during my research for this article and relaxedly contemplating the amusing color juxtaposed against the geometric shape of the condiment packet on the table. I then realized that it was time for my medication and so took my pill before completing the tour. The tour guide was quick to point out that the [[Pyxie]]s were, in fact, not there but that the stuffed [[Tuckarando]] that I was attempting to feed, was. This led me to question whether I should ever trust the hoods who loiter on the corner of my block to go and fill my prescription ever again. In this regard, art has enriched my life tremendously. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 22:52, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:52, 29 April 2005
Line 21:		Line 21:
	My dear Lady, if you have paintings ''speaking'' to you, then might I recommend some [[Theoalchemy\|theoalchemical]] remedies for your ailments? Surely you cannot expect us to believe that artwork can have a ''voice''? This is sheer madness! Then again, I suppose if a disease such as [[Zygotic Dermatosis]] is in existance, quite anything is possible. Still, I would hope that you are not quite serious about talking paintings. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 18:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)		My dear Lady, if you have paintings ''speaking'' to you, then might I recommend some [[Theoalchemy\|theoalchemical]] remedies for your ailments? Surely you cannot expect us to believe that artwork can have a ''voice''? This is sheer madness! Then again, I suppose if a disease such as [[Zygotic Dermatosis]] is in existance, quite anything is possible. Still, I would hope that you are not quite serious about talking paintings. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 18:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

−	Once again I am saddened by the lack of artistic appreciation which fills my fellow scholars. How can you not know how it feels when a piece of art reaches out and touches your very soul with its many-colored tentacles of inspiration and understanding? We must always remember that no matter how much dry knowledge we accumulate, no matter how many luminous pages we fill with our droning, it is all dead and in vain if we do not allow beauty spirit and soul to touch our hearts and other internal organs. Anyone so spiritually dead that they have never been moved, or at least nudged, by the art of the likes of O'~~Donnel~~ should not be allowed to call themselves men (or women) of Knowledge. --[[User:Lankin\|Lankin the Mad Mage]] 22:27, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)	+	Once again I am saddened by the lack of artistic appreciation which fills my fellow scholars. How can you not know how it feels when a piece of art reaches out and touches your very soul with its many-colored tentacles of inspiration and understanding? We must always remember that no matter how much dry knowledge we accumulate, no matter how many luminous pages we fill with our droning, it is all dead and in vain if we do not allow beauty spirit and soul to touch our hearts and other internal organs. Anyone so spiritually dead that they have never been moved, or at least nudged, by the art of the likes of O'Donnell should not be allowed to call themselves men (or women) of Knowledge. --[[User:Lankin\|Lankin the Mad Mage]] 22:27, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	I admit to sitting in the lunchroom of the Zaprosingfrink Gallery during my research for this article and relaxedly contemplating the amusing color juxtaposed against the geometric shape of the condiment packet on the table. I then realized that it was time for my medication and so took my pill before completing the tour. The tour guide was quick to point out that the [[Pyxies]] were, in fact, not there but that the stuffed [[Tuckarando]] that I was attempting to feed, was. This led me to question whether I should ever trust the hoods who loiter on the corner of my block to go and fill my prescription ever again. In this regard, art has enriched my life tremendously. --[[User:DrAckroyd\|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 22:52, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:27, 29 April 2005
Line 20:		Line 20:

	My dear Lady, if you have paintings ''speaking'' to you, then might I recommend some [[Theoalchemy\|theoalchemical]] remedies for your ailments? Surely you cannot expect us to believe that artwork can have a ''voice''? This is sheer madness! Then again, I suppose if a disease such as [[Zygotic Dermatosis]] is in existance, quite anything is possible. Still, I would hope that you are not quite serious about talking paintings. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 18:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)		My dear Lady, if you have paintings ''speaking'' to you, then might I recommend some [[Theoalchemy\|theoalchemical]] remedies for your ailments? Surely you cannot expect us to believe that artwork can have a ''voice''? This is sheer madness! Then again, I suppose if a disease such as [[Zygotic Dermatosis]] is in existance, quite anything is possible. Still, I would hope that you are not quite serious about talking paintings. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 18:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	Once again I am saddened by the lack of artistic appreciation which fills my fellow scholars. How can you not know how it feels when a piece of art reaches out and touches your very soul with its many-colored tentacles of inspiration and understanding? We must always remember that no matter how much dry knowledge we accumulate, no matter how many luminous pages we fill with our droning, it is all dead and in vain if we do not allow beauty spirit and soul to touch our hearts and other internal organs. Anyone so spiritually dead that they have never been moved, or at least nudged, by the art of the likes of O'Donnel should not be allowed to call themselves men (or women) of Knowledge. --[[User:Lankin\|Lankin the Mad Mage]] 22:27, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:46, 28 April 2005
Line 18:		Line 18:

	Quite. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 14:34, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)		Quite. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 14:34, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	My dear Lady, if you have paintings ''speaking'' to you, then might I recommend some [[Theoalchemy\|theoalchemical]] remedies for your ailments? Surely you cannot expect us to believe that artwork can have a ''voice''? This is sheer madness! Then again, I suppose if a disease such as [[Zygotic Dermatosis]] is in existance, quite anything is possible. Still, I would hope that you are not quite serious about talking paintings. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 18:46, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:34, 28 April 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:

	I must beg to differ with your so crudely stated opinion of quite possibly the best artist of our time. O'Donnell has time and again proved her mastery of the aesthetics and the techniques necessary in the act of creation. I presume that none of my fellow scholars would be among the ranks of those short-sighted critics who dismiss her work as 'pure plebian shock trollop,' because there is clearly so much more than the mere incongruency in her work. O'Donnell's paintings ''speak'' to the viewer, to the arbiterarity and precariousness of our times. Recall, for example, that beautiful work "Aelfant, Freege Horn and Luscious Pink Grapefruit Section, Still Bloody and Oozing." Have you ever seen such power, such pathos captured and transmuted so expressively by one artist's hands? --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 03:23, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)		I must beg to differ with your so crudely stated opinion of quite possibly the best artist of our time. O'Donnell has time and again proved her mastery of the aesthetics and the techniques necessary in the act of creation. I presume that none of my fellow scholars would be among the ranks of those short-sighted critics who dismiss her work as 'pure plebian shock trollop,' because there is clearly so much more than the mere incongruency in her work. O'Donnell's paintings ''speak'' to the viewer, to the arbiterarity and precariousness of our times. Recall, for example, that beautiful work "Aelfant, Freege Horn and Luscious Pink Grapefruit Section, Still Bloody and Oozing." Have you ever seen such power, such pathos captured and transmuted so expressively by one artist's hands? --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 03:23, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	Quite. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 14:34, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:23, 28 April 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Maybe it's just me, but O'Donnell's daubs make me want to puke. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 10:25, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)		Maybe it's just me, but O'Donnell's daubs make me want to puke. --[[User:Jcowan\|John Cowan]] 10:25, 27 Apr 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	I must beg to differ with your so crudely stated opinion of quite possibly the best artist of our time. O'Donnell has time and again proved her mastery of the aesthetics and the techniques necessary in the act of creation. I presume that none of my fellow scholars would be among the ranks of those short-sighted critics who dismiss her work as 'pure plebian shock trollop,' because there is clearly so much more than the mere incongruency in her work. O'Donnell's paintings ''speak'' to the viewer, to the arbiterarity and precariousness of our times. Recall, for example, that beautiful work "Aelfant, Freege Horn and Luscious Pink Grapefruit Section, Still Bloody and Oozing." Have you ever seen such power, such pathos captured and transmuted so expressively by one artist's hands? --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 03:23, 28 Apr 2005 (EDT)