Ghyll:Azura Mines - Revision history

Lady Aleksandra Quininery: sig change

2005-06-13T19:50:19Z

sig change

Sbp: Whoops, forgot to reply to the Lady.

2005-06-11T21:10:18Z

Whoops, forgot to reply to the Lady.

Lady Aleksandra Quininery: ouch. spelling hurts.

2005-05-31T06:36:43Z

ouch. spelling hurts.

Lady Aleksandra Quininery: retraction :(

2005-05-27T19:54:22Z

retraction :(

Morbus Iff: Threading sbp's message.

2005-05-27T19:32:06Z

Threading sbp's message.

Sbp: Go Team Q&P!

2005-05-27T19:25:01Z

Go Team Q&P!

Lady Aleksandra Quininery: the scandal! the outrage!

2005-05-27T19:10:31Z

the scandal! the outrage!

Undrhil: * Oooite. Oooite. I like how it sounds. I wonder how it tastes. *

2005-05-24T06:04:32Z

* Oooite. Oooite. I like how it sounds. I wonder how it tastes. *

Morbus Iff: Adding scholarly comment - about the underground gel.

2005-05-24T00:10:02Z

Adding scholarly comment - about the underground gel.

Morbus Iff: Whoops - forgot to add the category.

2005-05-24T00:04:18Z

Whoops - forgot to add the category.

@@ Line 7: / Line 7: @@
 '''Citations''': [[DasMineGold]], [[Iganefta]], [[NeoPostAncientism]].
---[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 12:05, 20 May 2005 (EDT)
+--[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra]] 12:05, 20 May 2005 (EDT)
 [[Category:Locations]]
@@ Line 17: / Line 17: @@
 :Oooite is a very valuable commodity at certain times.  It is easily the most recognizable substance on the planet.  If someone tries to sell you fake Oooite, you know it right away.  Sure, the gel is worth finding out about, but Oooite ... Oooite.  See how it just rolls off the tongue?  Oooite.  Did I mention that I just had my daily helping of Oooite?  It calms the bearings and helps you to find your nerves.  Or something like that. --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 02:04, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
-My dear sir:  I am deeply offended by your insinuations of potential scholarly bias on my part.  This is, after all, an encyclopedia, to which less forunate Ghyllians than us (with real work to do) must inevitably turn for reference on just such  "boring stats" and "economic possibilities."  If, my dear Morbus, you happen to have the evidence to back up your claims, I would happily include reference to such lake of gel in future revisions of my work; however, if you have nothing more that idle speculations, allow me to suggest you instead publish in [[Quester and Phorrus]]. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:10, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
+My dear sir:  I am deeply offended by your insinuations of potential scholarly bias on my part.  This is, after all, an encyclopedia, to which less forunate Ghyllians than us (with real work to do) must inevitably turn for reference on just such  "boring stats" and "economic possibilities."  If, my dear Morbus, you happen to have the evidence to back up your claims, I would happily include reference to such lake of gel in future revisions of my work; however, if you have nothing more that idle speculations, allow me to suggest you instead publish in [[Quester and Phorrus]]. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra]] 15:10, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
 :[[Quester and Phorrus]] is one of the most outstanding publications that Ghyll has to offer; and whilst I can cope with people disliking it to the point of not expanding their minds by reading it, calling it a publication of mere idle speculation is an insult bordering on the slanderous. I assume you'll be wanting to retract it forthwith. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 15:25, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
-::I do apologize for my hasty insult of the good journal.  By suggesting that the good Morbus ''attempt'' to publish his "idle speculations" the preeminent journal, I did not mean to imply that such journal was in any way a bastion of speculations.  Rather, I was entrusting the verification of his claims to their infallible system of peer review.  Of course, I have many reservations as to the likelihood of any lake of gel nonsense getting the okay from our peerless colleagues, I merely intended to invite him to try.  Once again, my grief is not against the journal per se, and I regret that in my haste I tarnished its brilliant name and shining reputation.  Although I must say, that late edition's editorial was quite simply tommyrot. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:54, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
+::I do apologize for my hasty insult of the good journal.  By suggesting that the good Morbus ''attempt'' to publish his "idle speculations" the preeminent journal, I did not mean to imply that such journal was in any way a bastion of speculations.  Rather, I was entrusting the verification of his claims to their infallible system of peer review.  Of course, I have many reservations as to the likelihood of any lake of gel nonsense getting the okay from our peerless colleagues, I merely intended to invite him to try.  Once again, my grief is not against the journal per se, and I regret that in my haste I tarnished its brilliant name and shining reputation.  Although I must say, that late edition's editorial was quite simply tommyrot. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery|Lady Aleksandra]] 15:54, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
 :::No problem, I quite understand really: especially since the outburst that Morbus directed at me on [[Encyclopedants Progress Report 26]]. I think his idle speculations at times are verging on the downright bizarre. What are we, for example, to make of the parenthetical remarks in [[Zyrgian Asylum]]? Anyway, many thanks for your kind retraction, Lady Q., and yeah, the latest edition's editorial wasn't exactly its shining moment... --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 17:10, 11 Jun 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:10, 11 June 2005
Line 22:		Line 22:

	::I do apologize for my hasty insult of the good journal. By suggesting that the good Morbus ''attempt'' to publish his "idle speculations" the preeminent journal, I did not mean to imply that such journal was in any way a bastion of speculations. Rather, I was entrusting the verification of his claims to their infallible system of peer review. Of course, I have many reservations as to the likelihood of any lake of gel nonsense getting the okay from our peerless colleagues, I merely intended to invite him to try. Once again, my grief is not against the journal per se, and I regret that in my haste I tarnished its brilliant name and shining reputation. Although I must say, that late edition's editorial was quite simply tommyrot. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:54, 27 May 2005 (EDT)		::I do apologize for my hasty insult of the good journal. By suggesting that the good Morbus ''attempt'' to publish his "idle speculations" the preeminent journal, I did not mean to imply that such journal was in any way a bastion of speculations. Rather, I was entrusting the verification of his claims to their infallible system of peer review. Of course, I have many reservations as to the likelihood of any lake of gel nonsense getting the okay from our peerless colleagues, I merely intended to invite him to try. Once again, my grief is not against the journal per se, and I regret that in my haste I tarnished its brilliant name and shining reputation. Although I must say, that late edition's editorial was quite simply tommyrot. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:54, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:::No problem, I quite understand really: especially since the outburst that Morbus directed at me on [[Encyclopedants Progress Report 26]]. I think his idle speculations at times are verging on the downright bizarre. What are we, for example, to make of the parenthetical remarks in [[Zyrgian Asylum]]? Anyway, many thanks for your kind retraction, Lady Q., and yeah, the latest edition's editorial wasn't exactly its shining moment... --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 17:10, 11 Jun 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:36, 31 May 2005
Line 21:		Line 21:
	:[[Quester and Phorrus]] is one of the most outstanding publications that Ghyll has to offer; and whilst I can cope with people disliking it to the point of not expanding their minds by reading it, calling it a publication of mere idle speculation is an insult bordering on the slanderous. I assume you'll be wanting to retract it forthwith. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 15:25, 27 May 2005 (EDT)		:[[Quester and Phorrus]] is one of the most outstanding publications that Ghyll has to offer; and whilst I can cope with people disliking it to the point of not expanding their minds by reading it, calling it a publication of mere idle speculation is an insult bordering on the slanderous. I assume you'll be wanting to retract it forthwith. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 15:25, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

−	::I do apologize for my hasty insult of the good journal. By suggesting that the good Morbus ''attempt'' to publish his "idle speculations" the preeminent journal, I did not mean to imply that such journal was in any way a bastion of speculations. Rather, I was entrusting the ~~verfication~~ of his claims to their infallible system of peer review. Of course, I have many reservations as to the likelihood of any lake of gel nonsense getting the okay from our peerless colleagues, I merely intended to invite him to try. Once again, my grief is not against the journal per se, and I regret that in my haste I tarnished its brilliant name and shining reputation. Although I must say, that late edition's editorial was quite simply tommyrot. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:54, 27 May 2005 (EDT)	+	::I do apologize for my hasty insult of the good journal. By suggesting that the good Morbus ''attempt'' to publish his "idle speculations" the preeminent journal, I did not mean to imply that such journal was in any way a bastion of speculations. Rather, I was entrusting the verification of his claims to their infallible system of peer review. Of course, I have many reservations as to the likelihood of any lake of gel nonsense getting the okay from our peerless colleagues, I merely intended to invite him to try. Once again, my grief is not against the journal per se, and I regret that in my haste I tarnished its brilliant name and shining reputation. Although I must say, that late edition's editorial was quite simply tommyrot. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:54, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:54, 27 May 2005
Line 20:		Line 20:

	:[[Quester and Phorrus]] is one of the most outstanding publications that Ghyll has to offer; and whilst I can cope with people disliking it to the point of not expanding their minds by reading it, calling it a publication of mere idle speculation is an insult bordering on the slanderous. I assume you'll be wanting to retract it forthwith. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 15:25, 27 May 2005 (EDT)		:[[Quester and Phorrus]] is one of the most outstanding publications that Ghyll has to offer; and whilst I can cope with people disliking it to the point of not expanding their minds by reading it, calling it a publication of mere idle speculation is an insult bordering on the slanderous. I assume you'll be wanting to retract it forthwith. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 15:25, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	::I do apologize for my hasty insult of the good journal. By suggesting that the good Morbus ''attempt'' to publish his "idle speculations" the preeminent journal, I did not mean to imply that such journal was in any way a bastion of speculations. Rather, I was entrusting the verfication of his claims to their infallible system of peer review. Of course, I have many reservations as to the likelihood of any lake of gel nonsense getting the okay from our peerless colleagues, I merely intended to invite him to try. Once again, my grief is not against the journal per se, and I regret that in my haste I tarnished its brilliant name and shining reputation. Although I must say, that late edition's editorial was quite simply tommyrot. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:54, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:32, 27 May 2005
Line 19:		Line 19:
	My dear sir: I am deeply offended by your insinuations of potential scholarly bias on my part. This is, after all, an encyclopedia, to which less forunate Ghyllians than us (with real work to do) must inevitably turn for reference on just such "boring stats" and "economic possibilities." If, my dear Morbus, you happen to have the evidence to back up your claims, I would happily include reference to such lake of gel in future revisions of my work; however, if you have nothing more that idle speculations, allow me to suggest you instead publish in [[Quester and Phorrus]]. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:10, 27 May 2005 (EDT)		My dear sir: I am deeply offended by your insinuations of potential scholarly bias on my part. This is, after all, an encyclopedia, to which less forunate Ghyllians than us (with real work to do) must inevitably turn for reference on just such "boring stats" and "economic possibilities." If, my dear Morbus, you happen to have the evidence to back up your claims, I would happily include reference to such lake of gel in future revisions of my work; however, if you have nothing more that idle speculations, allow me to suggest you instead publish in [[Quester and Phorrus]]. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:10, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

−	[[Quester and Phorrus]] is one of the most outstanding publications that Ghyll has to offer; and whilst I can cope with people disliking it to the point of not expanding their minds by reading it, calling it a publication of mere idle speculation is an insult bordering on the slanderous. I assume you'll be wanting to retract it forthwith. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 15:25, 27 May 2005 (EDT)	+	:[[Quester and Phorrus]] is one of the most outstanding publications that Ghyll has to offer; and whilst I can cope with people disliking it to the point of not expanding their minds by reading it, calling it a publication of mere idle speculation is an insult bordering on the slanderous. I assume you'll be wanting to retract it forthwith. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 15:25, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 27 May 2005
Line 18:		Line 18:

	My dear sir: I am deeply offended by your insinuations of potential scholarly bias on my part. This is, after all, an encyclopedia, to which less forunate Ghyllians than us (with real work to do) must inevitably turn for reference on just such "boring stats" and "economic possibilities." If, my dear Morbus, you happen to have the evidence to back up your claims, I would happily include reference to such lake of gel in future revisions of my work; however, if you have nothing more that idle speculations, allow me to suggest you instead publish in [[Quester and Phorrus]]. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:10, 27 May 2005 (EDT)		My dear sir: I am deeply offended by your insinuations of potential scholarly bias on my part. This is, after all, an encyclopedia, to which less forunate Ghyllians than us (with real work to do) must inevitably turn for reference on just such "boring stats" and "economic possibilities." If, my dear Morbus, you happen to have the evidence to back up your claims, I would happily include reference to such lake of gel in future revisions of my work; however, if you have nothing more that idle speculations, allow me to suggest you instead publish in [[Quester and Phorrus]]. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:10, 27 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	[[Quester and Phorrus]] is one of the most outstanding publications that Ghyll has to offer; and whilst I can cope with people disliking it to the point of not expanding their minds by reading it, calling it a publication of mere idle speculation is an insult bordering on the slanderous. I assume you'll be wanting to retract it forthwith. --[[User:Sbp\|Sean B. Palmer]] 15:25, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:10, 27 May 2005
Line 16:		Line 16:

	:Oooite is a very valuable commodity at certain times. It is easily the most recognizable substance on the planet. If someone tries to sell you fake Oooite, you know it right away. Sure, the gel is worth finding out about, but Oooite ... Oooite. See how it just rolls off the tongue? Oooite. Did I mention that I just had my daily helping of Oooite? It calms the bearings and helps you to find your nerves. Or something like that. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 02:04, 24 May 2005 (EDT)		:Oooite is a very valuable commodity at certain times. It is easily the most recognizable substance on the planet. If someone tries to sell you fake Oooite, you know it right away. Sure, the gel is worth finding out about, but Oooite ... Oooite. See how it just rolls off the tongue? Oooite. Did I mention that I just had my daily helping of Oooite? It calms the bearings and helps you to find your nerves. Or something like that. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 02:04, 24 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	My dear sir: I am deeply offended by your insinuations of potential scholarly bias on my part. This is, after all, an encyclopedia, to which less forunate Ghyllians than us (with real work to do) must inevitably turn for reference on just such "boring stats" and "economic possibilities." If, my dear Morbus, you happen to have the evidence to back up your claims, I would happily include reference to such lake of gel in future revisions of my work; however, if you have nothing more that idle speculations, allow me to suggest you instead publish in [[Quester and Phorrus]]. --[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 15:10, 27 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:04, 24 May 2005
Line 14:		Line 14:

	I think it's fairly safe to say that the fine Lady is a shill for Iganeftan diplomats. Oooite this, oooite that. Boring stats here, economic possibilities there. Bah! We all know there's a lake of gel somewhere below used in the production of [[Altoxian Bulb]]s - stop your mindless prattling of oooite mining, which has got to be the least interesting thing in the world (probably why the mines are so easily ignored as anything BUT for oooite production), and give us the extracted dirt on the gel! --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 20:10, 23 May 2005 (EDT)		I think it's fairly safe to say that the fine Lady is a shill for Iganeftan diplomats. Oooite this, oooite that. Boring stats here, economic possibilities there. Bah! We all know there's a lake of gel somewhere below used in the production of [[Altoxian Bulb]]s - stop your mindless prattling of oooite mining, which has got to be the least interesting thing in the world (probably why the mines are so easily ignored as anything BUT for oooite production), and give us the extracted dirt on the gel! --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 20:10, 23 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	:Oooite is a very valuable commodity at certain times. It is easily the most recognizable substance on the planet. If someone tries to sell you fake Oooite, you know it right away. Sure, the gel is worth finding out about, but Oooite ... Oooite. See how it just rolls off the tongue? Oooite. Did I mention that I just had my daily helping of Oooite? It calms the bearings and helps you to find your nerves. Or something like that. --[[User:Undrhil\|Trousle Undrhil]] 02:04, 24 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:10, 24 May 2005
Line 10:		Line 10:

	[[Category:Locations]]		[[Category:Locations]]
		+
		+	----
		+
		+	I think it's fairly safe to say that the fine Lady is a shill for Iganeftan diplomats. Oooite this, oooite that. Boring stats here, economic possibilities there. Bah! We all know there's a lake of gel somewhere below used in the production of [[Altoxian Bulb]]s - stop your mindless prattling of oooite mining, which has got to be the least interesting thing in the world (probably why the mines are so easily ignored as anything BUT for oooite production), and give us the extracted dirt on the gel! --[[User:Morbus Iff\|Morbus Iff]] 20:10, 23 May 2005 (EDT)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:04, 24 May 2005
Line 8:		Line 8:

	--[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 12:05, 20 May 2005 (EDT)		--[[User:Lady Aleksandra Quininery\|Lady Aleksandra Quininery]] 12:05, 20 May 2005 (EDT)
		+
		+	[[Category:Locations]]