<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="en">
	<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Talliesin</id>
	<title>Disobiki - User contributions [en]</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/api.php?action=feedcontributions&amp;feedformat=atom&amp;user=Talliesin"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/Talliesin"/>
	<updated>2026-06-01T06:00:50Z</updated>
	<subtitle>User contributions</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.33.0</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28310</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Cranee Historical Society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28310"/>
		<updated>2004-09-20T12:06:25Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I've decided to work on some of the details of distances of Ghyll, using the facts that one nanit is &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; according to [[Bindlet Ball]], and 18 nanits seems quite large as the basis for Ghyll distance terminology. I feel that [[sugro-nanit]] is really quite an irritating term, but I've used it and made it equivalent to a mile to give it some more substance. Cranee is to be between the [[Evesque Valley]] and Folktown, eighteen miles from Folktown and twenty five from the [[Evesque Valley]]. I'd say that a nanit could well be 20cm; that'd make the boxes 3.6m across, which seems about right for huge magnetic whatsits. A mile [http://www.google.com/search?q=one+mile+in+centimetres&amp;amp;oe=UTF-8 is 160934.4cm] according to Google, so that means that there are 8046.72 nanits to a mile. Okay! That means that there are 144840.96 nanits between Cranee and Folktown, and 201168 nanits between Cranee and the Evesque Valley. To tie it back into earthly distances, I can say that Cranee -&amp;gt; Folktown is 18 * 5280 &amp;quot;paces&amp;quot;, and then hope that Ghyllians are roughly the same size as humans--and I think that they should be, but I guess there's no way of knowing. Everything in the Ghyll universe could be different, so it's a case of making all the relative distances work. This section should go in the Talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
Ladies and not-so-ladies: this is, in some respects, a protest and parody entry. As I've already confided to Morbus, I'm slightly worried about the direction that Ghyll is taking on many levels, and I am here proposing a reform. The main problem is that we simply do not have enough reading and discussion time in contrast to the writing time. We have ten to twenty entries per turn: we've had eighteen this week, and it's simply too much too keep up with. Keeping up with the entries themselves isn't even the biggest problem, it's that it leads to a proliferation of entries that are written in complete isolation from one another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that instead of having a week of writing time and zero contemplation and discussion time, we should try to balance it out somewhat more. Perhaps every five turns, we could have a period of two weeks where no one is allowed to contribute to the canon, and we have to discuss what's been going on in the wiki, what we hope for the characters, where we want the game to develop. There is simply ''no'' out-of-game discussion about the game at the moment, whereas I think that ought to be its principal feature! I think this comes from us wanting to keep our ideas to ourselves so that we can surprise people when we publish them, but I also think it comes from us not planning our entries out in advance, ot wanting to seek others' input, and often from just rushing the entries full-stop. We had three entries in the half an hour before the turn's deadline, and that's silly: as Morbus suggests, we ought to place a moratorium on entries before the deadline, but I think that it should be quite a bit longer than Morbus is probably thinking. A week may be too short a time anyway, so I'm thinking about having five days to soak up the entries and discuss future directions, and then five days in which to write all our dibs. So the process will be day 1: dib; days 1-5: discuss and plan; days 6-10: write entries. That we had three entries in the last half an hour of the turn seems to indicate that a week is simply not long enough for people to catch up with Ghyll (and I must admit that this is partly spurred on by me having some commitments over the next week or so that's going to make it difficult to play Ghyll), though the period that we had for turn A seems too long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cranee was written quite ''extempore'', but when you look at the structure it's quite obvious that the top section is pedantry gone mad (the distance measures) and the rest is whimsy. I'm kinda irritated that people haven't been able to look into the easter eggs and puns etc. that I hid in my previous two entries, and I decided I wasn't going to waste the time on this entry doing the same--but I've also had not much time to check out the puns and cool references in other people's entries. Perhaps each time an entry is written up, people ought to discuss all the references in the Talk page instead of just leaving them all hidden. I don't think that just banging out entries every week can really be thought of as all that playing Ghyll consists of: you have to care about creating a large and consistent lexicon here, and I'm not sure what percentage of the players really feel that. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Just What is the Intent of Play?==&lt;br /&gt;
I hate to be a dork, but I'm not &amp;quot;feeling&amp;quot; the idea of a discussion period - it seems to change the focus of the game away from &amp;quot;let's challenge myself by letting others pervert my ideas&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;let's put ideas on the table and collectively write them together&amp;quot;. If that's the direction Neel wanted to take in his development of &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, then he wouldn't need to stress the facts that &amp;quot;you are cranky, opinionated, prejudiced, and eccentric&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;you can argue vociferously with the interpretation and introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;. If the intent of the OOG discussions is for everyone to agree on what the direction and goals are, and then to write fiction supporting those goals, we're removing the need for scholars to be cranky and prejudiced (they're just documenting what everyone agrees on), and also arguments and introduction (scholars don't need to argue because the OOG player discussions have already done that, and new facts don't need to be introduced because they've already been agreed upon in the discussion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, the name, and specifically, &amp;quot;the RPG&amp;quot; is telling. If you've never played a game of Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons or anything similar, then you don't know about the challenge between the players and the game master. The game master has a story inside his head, and it contains plots, characters, and locations. The players are playing in ''his'' world, but the plot is now dictated by ''their'' actions. It is ''very'' common for the GM to make this wonderful plot line, and then to have the players accidentally (unbeknownst to their knowledge) kill a crucial figure, thus destroying the intricate events the GM had planned. ''This is the challenge, and fun, of roleplaying games.'' Sure, game masters can say &amp;quot;uh, don't do that&amp;quot;, but that is generally vilified: players don't want to play a game ''on the rails'', where their actions are constrained to set points and results - they want the plot to revolve around them, for they are the reason the game is being played.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, we are all players, but we are also all game masters. We game master the entries we write, presumably with a world view, but then the other players pervert our ideas with their own course of action. As game masters, we're constrained by the rules to ''accept'' what the players do with our ideas - as players, we're vindicated knowing we're not ''on the rails''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With all that said, I do agree, however, that the three entries immediately before midnight is a very bad and slippery slope: going back to the RPG, it'd be like the game master inventing his plot line for the night's gaming session five minutes before it happens. Players ''will'' notice that you've come unprepared - the game stops being fun, and the effort stops being made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do think, however, that  ''justification'' could be a decent advocate of ''contemplation''. One of my favorite pleasures is listening to DVD commentaries, or to read &amp;quot;developer notes&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;change logs&amp;quot; in games or computer software. They give me an extra level of enjoyment over what I own, read, or use every day. What if, for example, dibbing and writing occurs from Saturday to Thursday, and Friday is spent writing justifications for your entries in the Talk: namespace? These justifications wouldn't be plot revealing... I wouldn't explain why I suggested that Windsor Creame didn't murder Daniel Mboya, but I could reveal that the Folktown Records newspaper was inspired by children's magazines like Ranger Rick or Highlights, or that I really wanted a grey area between &amp;quot;wait, he worked for the paper for 12 years, and he flips out to the point of murder?!&amp;quot; --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've sent Neel an email pointing him to this page. Perhaps he'll weigh in too. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:39, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about a mandatory OOG discussion note for each entry where each author explains any hidden subtext/gives a brief explanation of why they wrote how they did? Also, I agree a week might be too short once the enthusiasm wears off- what about requiring a draft entry at the end of the week, then a week for exploring the other new entries, looking for new opportunities to connect entries, asking questions, making suggestions, and refining your own work? --[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 09:53, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Continuing Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
The point about a discussion period is not that it takes away the room for debate, but that it fosters it. Not only can the debates still happen, but we can talk about the debates too, tell each other why we're debating in the manner that we are (if we so choose), etc. For example, I might be arguing just for the sake of argument, because I have an actual point, or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see your point about the RPG, and I don't want to take away from that--I want to just make sure we don't fall into pitholes of inconsistency. I also rather dislike the proliferation of so many new things without substance... who cares if Smoldock the Pinghopper fucknuzzled Gangliest Mifferfuddle III on -75/8/1 EC? Only Smoldock's girlfriend at the time, and that certainly wasn't me. I've been as guilty of the shallow invention problem as anyone, and I'm not even sure it's possible to fix now, but imagine if we decreed a rule saying that players can only create a set amount of new nomenclature per turn, or perhaps none at all. Do you think that we'd be able to get along? If you could only create one new thing to interact with the entire Ghyll world as it already exists, what would it be? That's a question which really gets you thinking, whereas the ability to create another Pluzzhucker The Hoobervlonking Ganglesmaking Fridgemagnet Collector seems to not be working as effectively. It's like being constrained by metre and rhyme in poetry--poems tend to come out better when you don't restart the basic building blocks from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, I'd really like to get to know the things that are currently in Ghyll and then proceed very cautiously to investigate what we've got. For every current entry, I'm sure that there are a huge portion that have secondary ideas that the authors are hoping to expand upon later in the game, and I'd like to know them. I suppose for something like Agony Uncle I didn't actually want to know because the mystery was the best part, but I think to a great extent that was an absolutely archetypal entry. If Andelphracian Lights has to any extent fuelled the trend of creating a set of boring assed organizations and other entities then I very much regret it--I wanted to first define the toenail clipper manufacturers, the strange luminous scum that you get on the underside of some rocks in the Evesque Valley, and the strange configuration of pips that you find in Fefferberries. I don't think I can point to a single entry in the game that I've really enjoyed yet, but a handful of them show some really great promising threads that I'd love to extract and have form the proper basis of Ghyll. That's why I keep raising the idea that after the round we all vote between us which our favourite parts are, and then just stick to those and start all the rest over from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I think that the justifications are certainly good ideas, and I'd probably support any extension to the turns' deadlines and reflection periods. But it's probably a good thing, as you've said yourself, to keep the turns fairly short as it'll force commitment from the players. If you consider my five days and five days proposal, though, note that the actual time in which we can edit is only five days, so that's less than the week that we have currently. And the ten days overall is only three days more than the current period for a turn. I don't think you can force justifications to be written on a single day--that's really restrictive and so people are just going to ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary: I'd like to foster out-of-game discussion of debates, restrict the shallow invention problem, instigate the five days and five days turn pattern, and require justifications to be written by players in the second five day period. I'd also like to hear what others think about these proposals. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 10:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Continuing Exasperations==&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred&amp;quot;''  worries me. If the plot nuance is only a plot nuance in your entry, then it's not a fact merely a suggestion, and you can't stop other players from taking it in their own direction. Hell, I could have said that, yes, Windsor murdered Daniel, but any scholar would be able to &amp;quot;introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;, creating a murder mystery because of newly discovered evidence. This is the challenge, and perversion, of our ideas, our truths... the inspiration and reason to play a game is arguably more important then the rules that govern it. Give and take is a part of RPGs - ''if things progress believably'', players will ''accept'' that the villian or plot device they just killed has come back from the dead, and the game master will be back on track with his previously devised plot. Of course, accidental or idiotic disregard, say that Besq boats are made out of cake pans and not trees, is call for foul - if it's not believable, if there's no justification, then it needs to be addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have both, and always, agreed on the proliferation of namealoo and macro entries - we both believe that micro entries, as per the archetypal &amp;quot;Agony uncle&amp;quot; are stronger, and we attempted to stifle macro entries by the grey area of dates, and a plea not to create new geographic locations. These pleas seem to have fallen on deaf ears, and arguably, we're having this discussion (again) because certain players aren't seeing the grander picture, aren't visualing the future of disparity, or simply don't care enough to start inwards and work outwards. I can stare at my desk, and if I were beginning an encyclopedia, describing things within five feet of me would take a rather long time to describe, and I could do each without needing to expound on its history or place of origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, we've now got a rather large area to work within, long running conflicts and history (which I exasperated in an attempt to shrink our geographic location, but also chose not to be formally recognized in an attempt to minimize its influence). None of this really gives me, as a scholar, and more importantly, an inhabitant, of the Ghyll world, any inspiration to wake up in the morning, drink a cup of fefferberry tea, read the week's Record, or tuck my daugher into her nursing sack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for timeframes, I personally think, and suspect others do as well, that deadlines should be based on anniversaries - every week, every two weeks, every Sunday, etc., etc - that'll be far easier to remember then &amp;quot;damn, has ten days gone by? is it Monday or Tuesday this week. oh bugge... oooO, J.Lo!&amp;quot;. I think we're (ultimately) in agreement with our justification/discussion suggestions, as well as macro/micro. Per your suggestion, just waiting for everyone else to weigh in. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 11:13, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A big part of the game is &amp;quot;The best laid plans of mice and men&amp;quot;. I was going to introduce a really good twist to the Daniel Mboya story (and it would have both been subtle and also tied it in to something else) but there was no way I could get that into the story of a sailor from around 200 years ago, and I considered it more anti-social to have a Mexican stand-off around who took the last undibbed entry and who got to create their own from scratch, so I didn't get to add to that story. Also, [[Betrothal march]] got defined in a way that goes completely against my ideas of it. But that's where the uncertainty comes in that makes playing this different to sitting at my computer writing poor speculative fiction. --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 14:11, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And, not targeting you (of course), the above is exactly what ''can't'' happen in these sorts of OOG discussions that Sean is proposing: if, at any time, someone says &amp;quot;well, this phantom I made, this is how I see it playing out&amp;quot;, then the game ''will no longer be fun''. We'll either have people writing fiction that is exactly how others have envisioned it (where's the challenge in that? the fun of Lexicon is integration not supplication) or we'll have the scorn of players saying &amp;quot;wait, that's not what I said on IRC the other day - you just ruined my next turn! I thought we ''had'' this discussion!&amp;quot;. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 16:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly! I'm really pleased with what happened to [[Betrothal march]] (and tri-menth), it was totally consistent with what I'd written and totally different to what I'd thought - cool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for my twist to the Daniel Mboya case, maybe it'll still get in there, but if it doesn't then that's just the way the game goes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, if anyone dibs [[Darvekian Party]] next round I'll give their legs such a smacking! ;p~ --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 17:21, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I Simply Want The Lot Of You To Die Horribly. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I like the longer-turn idea. Boo to the large talk-page discussions. I got his with a poisonous dart a while ago, tense talking before I pass out. I think the EPRs are really crucial to the whole of Ghyll, as they are subtly telling you what to do. Perhaps too subtly. Perhaps even in not enough detail. Players right now have an irritating habit of both following them too heavily, and totally ignoring them. We'll soon have around 6 historical societies all centered around the Evesque Valley. It's up to the Encyclopedants to make sure that we don't have 5 different ghylls, and up the the players as a whole to make plots. Too much dissidence. My keyboard just hissed at me. Plots should be secretive in nature, and developed by a bunch of people in rapid succession. Foomistress lays down the groundwork, Foomatic builds up on the story, we see a branch, Bardude1932 builds a story on the branch. Barista makes a plot twist on the main trunk. All of this is organically happening, no sharing of plot details needed. My desk is now an odd shade of purple. There should be a lot more cohesion. --[[User:d8uv|Melik Fizzou]] 22:12, 18 Sep 2004 (EDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD ...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== On Control, Controlling People and Just Letting Go and Having FUN ==&lt;br /&gt;
Right, so, the game has taken an unexpected turn.  Well, at least, it has for some people.  Personally, it is precisely what I thought it would be.  Massive, confusing, complicated and filled with entries of wildly varying focus and content.  Wasn't that the damn point?  &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The world is not a nice, well-defined place.  There are grey areas.  People don't agree on many, many things.  Often.  I think this is accurately reflected in the Encyclopedia.  What's more, I think it's the entire charm of the game.  There are some entries that, in my opinion, really shine.  Alas, I don't think mine are any of them.  Yet.  We've only been through two complete rounds.  Most of us are still gettting the hang of this entire concept, not to mention the specific rules.  Give it time!  Be patient!&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For example, I am not a professional writer, though at a weak moment in my life, I dreamed of that.  So, my writing is somewhat less polished than, say, Morbus'.  Still, I hold my own.  Also, I fill most of my day not with writting or RPG-related thought, but with troubleshooting servers.  That is what pays my bills.  So, when I get the chance, I read the other entries and occasionally make notes.  Mostly this is done at lunch or while I'm loading software or rebooting a server.  It is haphazard and &amp;quot;catch as catch can&amp;quot;.  Still, I find it quite fun and very recreational.  Especially when I let go of how my phantoms were being used.  I assure you that Ball Lightning Liqueur was not intended to be an explosive!  However, that was the risk I took making the *phantom* instead of hoarding the ne entry for myself later.  In fact, after prompting some additional information (ie. a reference to the Anise Engine) which was missing, I rather enjoyed the odd turn of events.  In future entries, I hope to refer back to Ball Lightning Liqueur and change the interpretation of its significance.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, it *is* your game and your server and all that, so you can do whatever you want, but I think you have a much better game than you realize.  Try just letting go of your own expectations for the game, its progress and its direction and having some fun.  That is what the *game* component is all about, right?  Having fun?  That *is*, after all, why we spend so much of our free time doing this, right?  Because we're all having fun?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Just a thought.  --[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 12:44, 19 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== More random remarks ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Since all of you folks are writing extensively on this matter, I thought I would take the opportunity to say, emphatically, ME TOO. :-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I find most delightful about writing fiction is how stories write themselves and unexpected things happen. Writing collaborative multi-perspective fictional historical fiction in this matter amplifies that to such an enormous extent that it makes it almost like real life. Positively delightful.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Someone dibbed an entry that I had practically all the way written in me brane. (I set my alarm for 11:45pm so that I could be the first to dib it. Apparently I had the volume turned down. Bah.) Them's the breaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And I have an entry almost completely written for something several turns in the future. I will be muchly distraught if someone else gets it. But I'm not going to try to circumvent the rules of the game for that. Although I'm sure my idea is better. ;-)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd like to see a moratorium on any more friken organizations/religions/secret societies/guilds/whatever, since these seem to be getting just a touch out of control. Yes, I contributed a political (I think) party to the malaise, so I'm just as much to blame.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Anyways, I guess what I'm saying is that things seem to be going roughly as I anticipated - mostly chaotic mult-track story development, evolving in wholely unexpected ways. I don't want to see more stringent control, really, although it seems that evolving rules based on problems as they come up, seems completely reasonable.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What I don't want is someone telling me that I wrote a particular entry *wrong* because it's not what the phantomer had in mind. I'm moderately sure that the things I phantomed won't turn out the way I envisioned, just as I'm sure that Morbue (damn his eyes) won't write about Cataract Road in the particular way that I had planned before he beat me to the dib. Again, them's the breaks.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'll quit before I get as verbose as some of the rest of y'all. I should have stopped after &amp;quot;ME TOO.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]] 14:11, 19 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I'd agree that there are enough organizations and places right now. Show us some inventions, people! And I'd also agree that a &amp;quot;disscussion period&amp;quot; would lead to all sorts of pre-planning, etc. etc., and miss what seems to be, at least to me, the intention of Ghyll in the first place: People taking ideas off in unexpected directions. I had no idea what to do with betrothal march at first. What I came up with is ''interesting'', at least, and nothing like what [[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] had in mind. And that's the intent, right?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, and [[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]], don't get to attached to the Darvekian Party... --[[User:Darus Ixa|Darus Ixa]] 7:12, 19 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I didn't say there's enough places. There are 27 cities with Bindlet Ball teams, after all. :-) --[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]] 06:44, 20 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
You know, I could stand to have a few more cities, in particular, and more places don't seem a burden, but perhaps we need to slow down on the creation of &amp;quot;new&amp;quot; words.  For instance, &amp;quot;Cresent Bay&amp;quot; is just as good a city as &amp;quot;Cranosticknarf&amp;quot;, but it's not a new word for people to have learn.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
OTH, I'll be damned if I'm going to stop having fun just because someone doesn't think the game is going as planned.  This is the most fun I've had in months and months and I'm not going to let a stick-in-the-mud keep me from it. ^_^ --[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]] 07:23, 20 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Darned kids these days --[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]] 07:55, 20 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Yes, we're a big short of cities, but let's hold off on inventing more unless we really need a city other than Folktown. Also, I had to break the rule and invent the [[Dagger Seas]] (probably, I'm still at first draft) since I had a sailor to describe, and nowhere for him to sail. I did opt for Dagger Seas rather than Dxorthian Seas or something else totally made up on the one hand or Really-Stormy-In-The-South-Calm-In-The-North-Good-Fishing-During-The-Warmer-Seasons Seas on the other. Dagger's a normal word, but I can think about half a dozen completely different reasons why seas might be called such without really trying, so hopefully whoever gets it will do something good with it. --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 08:06, 20 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28301</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Cranee Historical Society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28301"/>
		<updated>2004-09-18T21:23:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I've decided to work on some of the details of distances of Ghyll, using the facts that one nanit is &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; according to [[Bindlet Ball]], and 18 nanits seems quite large as the basis for Ghyll distance terminology. I feel that [[sugro-nanit]] is really quite an irritating term, but I've used it and made it equivalent to a mile to give it some more substance. Cranee is to be between the [[Evesque Valley]] and Folktown, eighteen miles from Folktown and twenty five from the [[Evesque Valley]]. I'd say that a nanit could well be 20cm; that'd make the boxes 3.6m across, which seems about right for huge magnetic whatsits. A mile [http://www.google.com/search?q=one+mile+in+centimetres&amp;amp;oe=UTF-8 is 160934.4cm] according to Google, so that means that there are 8046.72 nanits to a mile. Okay! That means that there are 144840.96 nanits between Cranee and Folktown, and 201168 nanits between Cranee and the Evesque Valley. To tie it back into earthly distances, I can say that Cranee -&amp;gt; Folktown is 18 * 5280 &amp;quot;paces&amp;quot;, and then hope that Ghyllians are roughly the same size as humans--and I think that they should be, but I guess there's no way of knowing. Everything in the Ghyll universe could be different, so it's a case of making all the relative distances work. This section should go in the Talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
Ladies and not-so-ladies: this is, in some respects, a protest and parody entry. As I've already confided to Morbus, I'm slightly worried about the direction that Ghyll is taking on many levels, and I am here proposing a reform. The main problem is that we simply do not have enough reading and discussion time in contrast to the writing time. We have ten to twenty entries per turn: we've had eighteen this week, and it's simply too much too keep up with. Keeping up with the entries themselves isn't even the biggest problem, it's that it leads to a proliferation of entries that are written in complete isolation from one another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that instead of having a week of writing time and zero contemplation and discussion time, we should try to balance it out somewhat more. Perhaps every five turns, we could have a period of two weeks where no one is allowed to contribute to the canon, and we have to discuss what's been going on in the wiki, what we hope for the characters, where we want the game to develop. There is simply ''no'' out-of-game discussion about the game at the moment, whereas I think that ought to be its principal feature! I think this comes from us wanting to keep our ideas to ourselves so that we can surprise people when we publish them, but I also think it comes from us not planning our entries out in advance, ot wanting to seek others' input, and often from just rushing the entries full-stop. We had three entries in the half an hour before the turn's deadline, and that's silly: as Morbus suggests, we ought to place a moratorium on entries before the deadline, but I think that it should be quite a bit longer than Morbus is probably thinking. A week may be too short a time anyway, so I'm thinking about having five days to soak up the entries and discuss future directions, and then five days in which to write all our dibs. So the process will be day 1: dib; days 1-5: discuss and plan; days 6-10: write entries. That we had three entries in the last half an hour of the turn seems to indicate that a week is simply not long enough for people to catch up with Ghyll (and I must admit that this is partly spurred on by me having some commitments over the next week or so that's going to make it difficult to play Ghyll), though the period that we had for turn A seems too long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cranee was written quite ''extempore'', but when you look at the structure it's quite obvious that the top section is pedantry gone mad (the distance measures) and the rest is whimsy. I'm kinda irritated that people haven't been able to look into the easter eggs and puns etc. that I hid in my previous two entries, and I decided I wasn't going to waste the time on this entry doing the same--but I've also had not much time to check out the puns and cool references in other people's entries. Perhaps each time an entry is written up, people ought to discuss all the references in the Talk page instead of just leaving them all hidden. I don't think that just banging out entries every week can really be thought of as all that playing Ghyll consists of: you have to care about creating a large and consistent lexicon here, and I'm not sure what percentage of the players really feel that. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Just What is the Intent of Play?==&lt;br /&gt;
I hate to be a dork, but I'm not &amp;quot;feeling&amp;quot; the idea of a discussion period - it seems to change the focus of the game away from &amp;quot;let's challenge myself by letting others pervert my ideas&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;let's put ideas on the table and collectively write them together&amp;quot;. If that's the direction Neel wanted to take in his development of &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, then he wouldn't need to stress the facts that &amp;quot;you are cranky, opinionated, prejudiced, and eccentric&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;you can argue vociferously with the interpretation and introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;. If the intent of the OOG discussions is for everyone to agree on what the direction and goals are, and then to write fiction supporting those goals, we're removing the need for scholars to be cranky and prejudiced (they're just documenting what everyone agrees on), and also arguments and introduction (scholars don't need to argue because the OOG player discussions have already done that, and new facts don't need to be introduced because they've already been agreed upon in the discussion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, the name, and specifically, &amp;quot;the RPG&amp;quot; is telling. If you've never played a game of Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons or anything similar, then you don't know about the challenge between the players and the game master. The game master has a story inside his head, and it contains plots, characters, and locations. The players are playing in ''his'' world, but the plot is now dictated by ''their'' actions. It is ''very'' common for the GM to make this wonderful plot line, and then to have the players accidentally (unbeknownst to their knowledge) kill a crucial figure, thus destroying the intricate events the GM had planned. ''This is the challenge, and fun, of roleplaying games.'' Sure, game masters can say &amp;quot;uh, don't do that&amp;quot;, but that is generally vilified: players don't want to play a game ''on the rails'', where their actions are constrained to set points and results - they want the plot to revolve around them, for they are the reason the game is being played.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, we are all players, but we are also all game masters. We game master the entries we write, presumably with a world view, but then the other players pervert our ideas with their own course of action. As game masters, we're constrained by the rules to ''accept'' what the players do with our ideas - as players, we're vindicated knowing we're not ''on the rails''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With all that said, I do agree, however, that the three entries immediately before midnight is a very bad and slippery slope: going back to the RPG, it'd be like the game master inventing his plot line for the night's gaming session five minutes before it happens. Players ''will'' notice that you've come unprepared - the game stops being fun, and the effort stops being made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do think, however, that  ''justification'' could be a decent advocate of ''contemplation''. One of my favorite pleasures is listening to DVD commentaries, or to read &amp;quot;developer notes&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;change logs&amp;quot; in games or computer software. They give me an extra level of enjoyment over what I own, read, or use every day. What if, for example, dibbing and writing occurs from Saturday to Thursday, and Friday is spent writing justifications for your entries in the Talk: namespace? These justifications wouldn't be plot revealing... I wouldn't explain why I suggested that Windsor Creame didn't murder Daniel Mboya, but I could reveal that the Folktown Records newspaper was inspired by children's magazines like Ranger Rick or Highlights, or that I really wanted a grey area between &amp;quot;wait, he worked for the paper for 12 years, and he flips out to the point of murder?!&amp;quot; --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've sent Neel an email pointing him to this page. Perhaps he'll weigh in too. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:39, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about a mandatory OOG discussion note for each entry where each author explains any hidden subtext/gives a brief explanation of why they wrote how they did? Also, I agree a week might be too short once the enthusiasm wears off- what about requiring a draft entry at the end of the week, then a week for exploring the other new entries, looking for new opportunities to connect entries, asking questions, making suggestions, and refining your own work? --[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 09:53, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Continuing Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
The point about a discussion period is not that it takes away the room for debate, but that it fosters it. Not only can the debates still happen, but we can talk about the debates too, tell each other why we're debating in the manner that we are (if we so choose), etc. For example, I might be arguing just for the sake of argument, because I have an actual point, or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see your point about the RPG, and I don't want to take away from that--I want to just make sure we don't fall into pitholes of inconsistency. I also rather dislike the proliferation of so many new things without substance... who cares if Smoldock the Pinghopper fucknuzzled Gangliest Mifferfuddle III on -75/8/1 EC? Only Smoldock's girlfriend at the time, and that certainly wasn't me. I've been as guilty of the shallow invention problem as anyone, and I'm not even sure it's possible to fix now, but imagine if we decreed a rule saying that players can only create a set amount of new nomenclature per turn, or perhaps none at all. Do you think that we'd be able to get along? If you could only create one new thing to interact with the entire Ghyll world as it already exists, what would it be? That's a question which really gets you thinking, whereas the ability to create another Pluzzhucker The Hoobervlonking Ganglesmaking Fridgemagnet Collector seems to not be working as effectively. It's like being constrained by metre and rhyme in poetry--poems tend to come out better when you don't restart the basic building blocks from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, I'd really like to get to know the things that are currently in Ghyll and then proceed very cautiously to investigate what we've got. For every current entry, I'm sure that there are a huge portion that have secondary ideas that the authors are hoping to expand upon later in the game, and I'd like to know them. I suppose for something like Agony Uncle I didn't actually want to know because the mystery was the best part, but I think to a great extent that was an absolutely archetypal entry. If Andelphracian Lights has to any extent fuelled the trend of creating a set of boring assed organizations and other entities then I very much regret it--I wanted to first define the toenail clipper manufacturers, the strange luminous scum that you get on the underside of some rocks in the Evesque Valley, and the strange configuration of pips that you find in Fefferberries. I don't think I can point to a single entry in the game that I've really enjoyed yet, but a handful of them show some really great promising threads that I'd love to extract and have form the proper basis of Ghyll. That's why I keep raising the idea that after the round we all vote between us which our favourite parts are, and then just stick to those and start all the rest over from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I think that the justifications are certainly good ideas, and I'd probably support any extension to the turns' deadlines and reflection periods. But it's probably a good thing, as you've said yourself, to keep the turns fairly short as it'll force commitment from the players. If you consider my five days and five days proposal, though, note that the actual time in which we can edit is only five days, so that's less than the week that we have currently. And the ten days overall is only three days more than the current period for a turn. I don't think you can force justifications to be written on a single day--that's really restrictive and so people are just going to ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary: I'd like to foster out-of-game discussion of debates, restrict the shallow invention problem, instigate the five days and five days turn pattern, and require justifications to be written by players in the second five day period. I'd also like to hear what others think about these proposals. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 10:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Continuing Exasperations==&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred&amp;quot;''  worries me. If the plot nuance is only a plot nuance in your entry, then it's not a fact merely a suggestion, and you can't stop other players from taking it in their own direction. Hell, I could have said that, yes, Windsor murdered Daniel, but any scholar would be able to &amp;quot;introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;, creating a murder mystery because of newly discovered evidence. This is the challenge, and perversion, of our ideas, our truths... the inspiration and reason to play a game is arguably more important then the rules that govern it. Give and take is a part of RPGs - ''if things progress believably'', players will ''accept'' that the villian or plot device they just killed has come back from the dead, and the game master will be back on track with his previously devised plot. Of course, accidental or idiotic disregard, say that Besq boats are made out of cake pans and not trees, is call for foul - if it's not believable, if there's no justification, then it needs to be addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have both, and always, agreed on the proliferation of namealoo and macro entries - we both believe that micro entries, as per the archetypal &amp;quot;Agony uncle&amp;quot; are stronger, and we attempted to stifle macro entries by the grey area of dates, and a plea not to create new geographic locations. These pleas seem to have fallen on deaf ears, and arguably, we're having this discussion (again) because certain players aren't seeing the grander picture, aren't visualing the future of disparity, or simply don't care enough to start inwards and work outwards. I can stare at my desk, and if I were beginning an encyclopedia, describing things within five feet of me would take a rather long time to describe, and I could do each without needing to expound on its history or place of origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, we've now got a rather large area to work within, long running conflicts and history (which I exasperated in an attempt to shrink our geographic location, but also chose not to be formally recognized in an attempt to minimize its influence). None of this really gives me, as a scholar, and more importantly, an inhabitant, of the Ghyll world, any inspiration to wake up in the morning, drink a cup of fefferberry tea, read the week's Record, or tuck my daugher into her nursing sack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for timeframes, I personally think, and suspect others do as well, that deadlines should be based on anniversaries - every week, every two weeks, every Sunday, etc., etc - that'll be far easier to remember then &amp;quot;damn, has ten days gone by? is it Monday or Tuesday this week. oh bugge... oooO, J.Lo!&amp;quot;. I think we're (ultimately) in agreement with our justification/discussion suggestions, as well as macro/micro. Per your suggestion, just waiting for everyone else to weigh in. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 11:13, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A big part of the game is &amp;quot;The best laid plans of mice and men&amp;quot;. I was going to introduce a really good twist to the Daniel Mboya story (and it would have both been subtle and also tied it in to something else) but there was no way I could get that into the story of a sailor from around 200 years ago, and I considered it more anti-social to have a Mexican stand-off around who took the last undibbed entry and who got to create their own from scratch, so I didn't get to add to that story. Also, [[Betrothal march]] got defined in a way that goes completely against my ideas of it. But that's where the uncertainty comes in that makes playing this different to sitting at my computer writing poor speculative fiction. --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 14:11, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And, not targeting you (of course), the above is exactly what ''can't'' happen in these sorts of OOG discussions that Sean is proposing: if, at any time, someone says &amp;quot;well, this phantom I made, this is how I see it playing out&amp;quot;, then the game ''will no longer be fun''. We'll either have people writing fiction that is exactly how others have envisioned it (where's the challenge in that? the fun of Lexicon is integration not supplication) or we'll have the scorn of players saying &amp;quot;wait, that's not what I said on IRC the other day - you just ruined my next turn! I thought we ''had'' this discussion!&amp;quot;. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 16:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly! I'm really pleased with what happened to [[Betrothal march]] (and tri-menth), it was totally consistent with what I'd written and totally different to what I'd thought - cool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for my twist to the Daniel Mboya case, maybe it'll still get in there, but if it doesn't then that's just the way the game goes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, if anyone dibs [[Darvekian Party]] next round I'll give their legs such a smacking! ;p~ --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 17:21, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28300</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Cranee Historical Society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28300"/>
		<updated>2004-09-18T21:21:28Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I've decided to work on some of the details of distances of Ghyll, using the facts that one nanit is &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; according to [[Bindlet Ball]], and 18 nanits seems quite large as the basis for Ghyll distance terminology. I feel that [[sugro-nanit]] is really quite an irritating term, but I've used it and made it equivalent to a mile to give it some more substance. Cranee is to be between the [[Evesque Valley]] and Folktown, eighteen miles from Folktown and twenty five from the [[Evesque Valley]]. I'd say that a nanit could well be 20cm; that'd make the boxes 3.6m across, which seems about right for huge magnetic whatsits. A mile [http://www.google.com/search?q=one+mile+in+centimetres&amp;amp;oe=UTF-8 is 160934.4cm] according to Google, so that means that there are 8046.72 nanits to a mile. Okay! That means that there are 144840.96 nanits between Cranee and Folktown, and 201168 nanits between Cranee and the Evesque Valley. To tie it back into earthly distances, I can say that Cranee -&amp;gt; Folktown is 18 * 5280 &amp;quot;paces&amp;quot;, and then hope that Ghyllians are roughly the same size as humans--and I think that they should be, but I guess there's no way of knowing. Everything in the Ghyll universe could be different, so it's a case of making all the relative distances work. This section should go in the Talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
Ladies and not-so-ladies: this is, in some respects, a protest and parody entry. As I've already confided to Morbus, I'm slightly worried about the direction that Ghyll is taking on many levels, and I am here proposing a reform. The main problem is that we simply do not have enough reading and discussion time in contrast to the writing time. We have ten to twenty entries per turn: we've had eighteen this week, and it's simply too much too keep up with. Keeping up with the entries themselves isn't even the biggest problem, it's that it leads to a proliferation of entries that are written in complete isolation from one another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that instead of having a week of writing time and zero contemplation and discussion time, we should try to balance it out somewhat more. Perhaps every five turns, we could have a period of two weeks where no one is allowed to contribute to the canon, and we have to discuss what's been going on in the wiki, what we hope for the characters, where we want the game to develop. There is simply ''no'' out-of-game discussion about the game at the moment, whereas I think that ought to be its principal feature! I think this comes from us wanting to keep our ideas to ourselves so that we can surprise people when we publish them, but I also think it comes from us not planning our entries out in advance, ot wanting to seek others' input, and often from just rushing the entries full-stop. We had three entries in the half an hour before the turn's deadline, and that's silly: as Morbus suggests, we ought to place a moratorium on entries before the deadline, but I think that it should be quite a bit longer than Morbus is probably thinking. A week may be too short a time anyway, so I'm thinking about having five days to soak up the entries and discuss future directions, and then five days in which to write all our dibs. So the process will be day 1: dib; days 1-5: discuss and plan; days 6-10: write entries. That we had three entries in the last half an hour of the turn seems to indicate that a week is simply not long enough for people to catch up with Ghyll (and I must admit that this is partly spurred on by me having some commitments over the next week or so that's going to make it difficult to play Ghyll), though the period that we had for turn A seems too long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cranee was written quite ''extempore'', but when you look at the structure it's quite obvious that the top section is pedantry gone mad (the distance measures) and the rest is whimsy. I'm kinda irritated that people haven't been able to look into the easter eggs and puns etc. that I hid in my previous two entries, and I decided I wasn't going to waste the time on this entry doing the same--but I've also had not much time to check out the puns and cool references in other people's entries. Perhaps each time an entry is written up, people ought to discuss all the references in the Talk page instead of just leaving them all hidden. I don't think that just banging out entries every week can really be thought of as all that playing Ghyll consists of: you have to care about creating a large and consistent lexicon here, and I'm not sure what percentage of the players really feel that. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Just What is the Intent of Play?==&lt;br /&gt;
I hate to be a dork, but I'm not &amp;quot;feeling&amp;quot; the idea of a discussion period - it seems to change the focus of the game away from &amp;quot;let's challenge myself by letting others pervert my ideas&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;let's put ideas on the table and collectively write them together&amp;quot;. If that's the direction Neel wanted to take in his development of &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, then he wouldn't need to stress the facts that &amp;quot;you are cranky, opinionated, prejudiced, and eccentric&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;you can argue vociferously with the interpretation and introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;. If the intent of the OOG discussions is for everyone to agree on what the direction and goals are, and then to write fiction supporting those goals, we're removing the need for scholars to be cranky and prejudiced (they're just documenting what everyone agrees on), and also arguments and introduction (scholars don't need to argue because the OOG player discussions have already done that, and new facts don't need to be introduced because they've already been agreed upon in the discussion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, the name, and specifically, &amp;quot;the RPG&amp;quot; is telling. If you've never played a game of Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons or anything similar, then you don't know about the challenge between the players and the game master. The game master has a story inside his head, and it contains plots, characters, and locations. The players are playing in ''his'' world, but the plot is now dictated by ''their'' actions. It is ''very'' common for the GM to make this wonderful plot line, and then to have the players accidentally (unbeknownst to their knowledge) kill a crucial figure, thus destroying the intricate events the GM had planned. ''This is the challenge, and fun, of roleplaying games.'' Sure, game masters can say &amp;quot;uh, don't do that&amp;quot;, but that is generally vilified: players don't want to play a game ''on the rails'', where their actions are constrained to set points and results - they want the plot to revolve around them, for they are the reason the game is being played.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, we are all players, but we are also all game masters. We game master the entries we write, presumably with a world view, but then the other players pervert our ideas with their own course of action. As game masters, we're constrained by the rules to ''accept'' what the players do with our ideas - as players, we're vindicated knowing we're not ''on the rails''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With all that said, I do agree, however, that the three entries immediately before midnight is a very bad and slippery slope: going back to the RPG, it'd be like the game master inventing his plot line for the night's gaming session five minutes before it happens. Players ''will'' notice that you've come unprepared - the game stops being fun, and the effort stops being made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do think, however, that  ''justification'' could be a decent advocate of ''contemplation''. One of my favorite pleasures is listening to DVD commentaries, or to read &amp;quot;developer notes&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;change logs&amp;quot; in games or computer software. They give me an extra level of enjoyment over what I own, read, or use every day. What if, for example, dibbing and writing occurs from Saturday to Thursday, and Friday is spent writing justifications for your entries in the Talk: namespace? These justifications wouldn't be plot revealing... I wouldn't explain why I suggested that Windsor Creame didn't murder Daniel Mboya, but I could reveal that the Folktown Records newspaper was inspired by children's magazines like Ranger Rick or Highlights, or that I really wanted a grey area between &amp;quot;wait, he worked for the paper for 12 years, and he flips out to the point of murder?!&amp;quot; --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've sent Neel an email pointing him to this page. Perhaps he'll weigh in too. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:39, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about a mandatory OOG discussion note for each entry where each author explains any hidden subtext/gives a brief explanation of why they wrote how they did? Also, I agree a week might be too short once the enthusiasm wears off- what about requiring a draft entry at the end of the week, then a week for exploring the other new entries, looking for new opportunities to connect entries, asking questions, making suggestions, and refining your own work? --[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 09:53, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Continuing Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
The point about a discussion period is not that it takes away the room for debate, but that it fosters it. Not only can the debates still happen, but we can talk about the debates too, tell each other why we're debating in the manner that we are (if we so choose), etc. For example, I might be arguing just for the sake of argument, because I have an actual point, or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see your point about the RPG, and I don't want to take away from that--I want to just make sure we don't fall into pitholes of inconsistency. I also rather dislike the proliferation of so many new things without substance... who cares if Smoldock the Pinghopper fucknuzzled Gangliest Mifferfuddle III on -75/8/1 EC? Only Smoldock's girlfriend at the time, and that certainly wasn't me. I've been as guilty of the shallow invention problem as anyone, and I'm not even sure it's possible to fix now, but imagine if we decreed a rule saying that players can only create a set amount of new nomenclature per turn, or perhaps none at all. Do you think that we'd be able to get along? If you could only create one new thing to interact with the entire Ghyll world as it already exists, what would it be? That's a question which really gets you thinking, whereas the ability to create another Pluzzhucker The Hoobervlonking Ganglesmaking Fridgemagnet Collector seems to not be working as effectively. It's like being constrained by metre and rhyme in poetry--poems tend to come out better when you don't restart the basic building blocks from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, I'd really like to get to know the things that are currently in Ghyll and then proceed very cautiously to investigate what we've got. For every current entry, I'm sure that there are a huge portion that have secondary ideas that the authors are hoping to expand upon later in the game, and I'd like to know them. I suppose for something like Agony Uncle I didn't actually want to know because the mystery was the best part, but I think to a great extent that was an absolutely archetypal entry. If Andelphracian Lights has to any extent fuelled the trend of creating a set of boring assed organizations and other entities then I very much regret it--I wanted to first define the toenail clipper manufacturers, the strange luminous scum that you get on the underside of some rocks in the Evesque Valley, and the strange configuration of pips that you find in Fefferberries. I don't think I can point to a single entry in the game that I've really enjoyed yet, but a handful of them show some really great promising threads that I'd love to extract and have form the proper basis of Ghyll. That's why I keep raising the idea that after the round we all vote between us which our favourite parts are, and then just stick to those and start all the rest over from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I think that the justifications are certainly good ideas, and I'd probably support any extension to the turns' deadlines and reflection periods. But it's probably a good thing, as you've said yourself, to keep the turns fairly short as it'll force commitment from the players. If you consider my five days and five days proposal, though, note that the actual time in which we can edit is only five days, so that's less than the week that we have currently. And the ten days overall is only three days more than the current period for a turn. I don't think you can force justifications to be written on a single day--that's really restrictive and so people are just going to ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary: I'd like to foster out-of-game discussion of debates, restrict the shallow invention problem, instigate the five days and five days turn pattern, and require justifications to be written by players in the second five day period. I'd also like to hear what others think about these proposals. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 10:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Continuing Exasperations==&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred&amp;quot;''  worries me. If the plot nuance is only a plot nuance in your entry, then it's not a fact merely a suggestion, and you can't stop other players from taking it in their own direction. Hell, I could have said that, yes, Windsor murdered Daniel, but any scholar would be able to &amp;quot;introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;, creating a murder mystery because of newly discovered evidence. This is the challenge, and perversion, of our ideas, our truths... the inspiration and reason to play a game is arguably more important then the rules that govern it. Give and take is a part of RPGs - ''if things progress believably'', players will ''accept'' that the villian or plot device they just killed has come back from the dead, and the game master will be back on track with his previously devised plot. Of course, accidental or idiotic disregard, say that Besq boats are made out of cake pans and not trees, is call for foul - if it's not believable, if there's no justification, then it needs to be addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have both, and always, agreed on the proliferation of namealoo and macro entries - we both believe that micro entries, as per the archetypal &amp;quot;Agony uncle&amp;quot; are stronger, and we attempted to stifle macro entries by the grey area of dates, and a plea not to create new geographic locations. These pleas seem to have fallen on deaf ears, and arguably, we're having this discussion (again) because certain players aren't seeing the grander picture, aren't visualing the future of disparity, or simply don't care enough to start inwards and work outwards. I can stare at my desk, and if I were beginning an encyclopedia, describing things within five feet of me would take a rather long time to describe, and I could do each without needing to expound on its history or place of origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, we've now got a rather large area to work within, long running conflicts and history (which I exasperated in an attempt to shrink our geographic location, but also chose not to be formally recognized in an attempt to minimize its influence). None of this really gives me, as a scholar, and more importantly, an inhabitant, of the Ghyll world, any inspiration to wake up in the morning, drink a cup of fefferberry tea, read the week's Record, or tuck my daugher into her nursing sack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for timeframes, I personally think, and suspect others do as well, that deadlines should be based on anniversaries - every week, every two weeks, every Sunday, etc., etc - that'll be far easier to remember then &amp;quot;damn, has ten days gone by? is it Monday or Tuesday this week. oh bugge... oooO, J.Lo!&amp;quot;. I think we're (ultimately) in agreement with our justification/discussion suggestions, as well as macro/micro. Per your suggestion, just waiting for everyone else to weigh in. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 11:13, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A big part of the game is &amp;quot;The best laid plans of mice and men&amp;quot;. I was going to introduce a really good twist to the Daniel Mboya story (and it would have both been subtle and also tied it in to something else) but there was no way I could get that into the story of a sailor from around 200 years ago, and I considered it more anti-social to have a Mexican stand-off around who took the last undibbed entry and who got to create their own from scratch, so I didn't get to add to that story. Also, [[Betrothal march]] got defined in a way that goes completely against my ideas of it. But that's where the uncertainty comes in that makes playing this different to sitting at my computer writing poor speculative fiction. --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 14:11, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
And, not targeting you (of course), the above is exactly what ''can't'' happen in these sorts of OOG discussions that Sean is proposing: if, at any time, someone says &amp;quot;well, this phantom I made, this is how I see it playing out&amp;quot;, then the game ''will no longer be fun''. We'll either have people writing fiction that is exactly how others have envisioned it (where's the challenge in that? the fun of Lexicon is integration not supplication) or we'll have the scorn of players saying &amp;quot;wait, that's not what I said on IRC the other day - you just ruined my next turn! I thought we ''had'' this discussion!&amp;quot;. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 16:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Exactly! I'm really pleased with what happened to [[Betrothal March]] (and tri-menth), it was totally consistent with what I'd written and totally different to what I'd thought - cool.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for my twist to the Daniel Mboya case, maybe it'll still get in there, but if it doesn't then that's just the way the game goes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Still, if anyone dibs [[Darvekian Party]] next round I'll give their legs such a smacking! ;p~ --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 17:21, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28298</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Cranee Historical Society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28298"/>
		<updated>2004-09-18T18:11:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I've decided to work on some of the details of distances of Ghyll, using the facts that one nanit is &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; according to [[Bindlet Ball]], and 18 nanits seems quite large as the basis for Ghyll distance terminology. I feel that [[sugro-nanit]] is really quite an irritating term, but I've used it and made it equivalent to a mile to give it some more substance. Cranee is to be between the [[Evesque Valley]] and Folktown, eighteen miles from Folktown and twenty five from the [[Evesque Valley]]. I'd say that a nanit could well be 20cm; that'd make the boxes 3.6m across, which seems about right for huge magnetic whatsits. A mile [http://www.google.com/search?q=one+mile+in+centimetres&amp;amp;oe=UTF-8 is 160934.4cm] according to Google, so that means that there are 8046.72 nanits to a mile. Okay! That means that there are 144840.96 nanits between Cranee and Folktown, and 201168 nanits between Cranee and the Evesque Valley. To tie it back into earthly distances, I can say that Cranee -&amp;gt; Folktown is 18 * 5280 &amp;quot;paces&amp;quot;, and then hope that Ghyllians are roughly the same size as humans--and I think that they should be, but I guess there's no way of knowing. Everything in the Ghyll universe could be different, so it's a case of making all the relative distances work. This section should go in the Talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
Ladies and not-so-ladies: this is, in some respects, a protest and parody entry. As I've already confided to Morbus, I'm slightly worried about the direction that Ghyll is taking on many levels, and I am here proposing a reform. The main problem is that we simply do not have enough reading and discussion time in contrast to the writing time. We have ten to twenty entries per turn: we've had eighteen this week, and it's simply too much too keep up with. Keeping up with the entries themselves isn't even the biggest problem, it's that it leads to a proliferation of entries that are written in complete isolation from one another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that instead of having a week of writing time and zero contemplation and discussion time, we should try to balance it out somewhat more. Perhaps every five turns, we could have a period of two weeks where no one is allowed to contribute to the canon, and we have to discuss what's been going on in the wiki, what we hope for the characters, where we want the game to develop. There is simply ''no'' out-of-game discussion about the game at the moment, whereas I think that ought to be its principal feature! I think this comes from us wanting to keep our ideas to ourselves so that we can surprise people when we publish them, but I also think it comes from us not planning our entries out in advance, ot wanting to seek others' input, and often from just rushing the entries full-stop. We had three entries in the half an hour before the turn's deadline, and that's silly: as Morbus suggests, we ought to place a moratorium on entries before the deadline, but I think that it should be quite a bit longer than Morbus is probably thinking. A week may be too short a time anyway, so I'm thinking about having five days to soak up the entries and discuss future directions, and then five days in which to write all our dibs. So the process will be day 1: dib; days 1-5: discuss and plan; days 6-10: write entries. That we had three entries in the last half an hour of the turn seems to indicate that a week is simply not long enough for people to catch up with Ghyll (and I must admit that this is partly spurred on by me having some commitments over the next week or so that's going to make it difficult to play Ghyll), though the period that we had for turn A seems too long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cranee was written quite ''extempore'', but when you look at the structure it's quite obvious that the top section is pedantry gone mad (the distance measures) and the rest is whimsy. I'm kinda irritated that people haven't been able to look into the easter eggs and puns etc. that I hid in my previous two entries, and I decided I wasn't going to waste the time on this entry doing the same--but I've also had not much time to check out the puns and cool references in other people's entries. Perhaps each time an entry is written up, people ought to discuss all the references in the Talk page instead of just leaving them all hidden. I don't think that just banging out entries every week can really be thought of as all that playing Ghyll consists of: you have to care about creating a large and consistent lexicon here, and I'm not sure what percentage of the players really feel that. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Just What is the Intent of Play?==&lt;br /&gt;
I hate to be a dork, but I'm not &amp;quot;feeling&amp;quot; the idea of a discussion period - it seems to change the focus of the game away from &amp;quot;let's challenge myself by letting others pervert my ideas&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;let's put ideas on the table and collectively write them together&amp;quot;. If that's the direction Neel wanted to take in his development of &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, then he wouldn't need to stress the facts that &amp;quot;you are cranky, opinionated, prejudiced, and eccentric&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;you can argue vociferously with the interpretation and introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;. If the intent of the OOG discussions is for everyone to agree on what the direction and goals are, and then to write fiction supporting those goals, we're removing the need for scholars to be cranky and prejudiced (they're just documenting what everyone agrees on), and also arguments and introduction (scholars don't need to argue because the OOG player discussions have already done that, and new facts don't need to be introduced because they've already been agreed upon in the discussion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, the name, and specifically, &amp;quot;the RPG&amp;quot; is telling. If you've never played a game of Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons or anything similar, then you don't know about the challenge between the players and the game master. The game master has a story inside his head, and it contains plots, characters, and locations. The players are playing in ''his'' world, but the plot is now dictated by ''their'' actions. It is ''very'' common for the GM to make this wonderful plot line, and then to have the players accidentally (unbeknownst to their knowledge) kill a crucial figure, thus destroying the intricate events the GM had planned. ''This is the challenge, and fun, of roleplaying games.'' Sure, game masters can say &amp;quot;uh, don't do that&amp;quot;, but that is generally vilified: players don't want to play a game ''on the rails'', where their actions are constrained to set points and results - they want the plot to revolve around them, for they are the reason the game is being played.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, we are all players, but we are also all game masters. We game master the entries we write, presumably with a world view, but then the other players pervert our ideas with their own course of action. As game masters, we're constrained by the rules to ''accept'' what the players do with our ideas - as players, we're vindicated knowing we're not ''on the rails''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With all that said, I do agree, however, that the three entries immediately before midnight is a very bad and slippery slope: going back to the RPG, it'd be like the game master inventing his plot line for the night's gaming session five minutes before it happens. Players ''will'' notice that you've come unprepared - the game stops being fun, and the effort stops being made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do think, however, that  ''justification'' could be a decent advocate of ''contemplation''. One of my favorite pleasures is listening to DVD commentaries, or to read &amp;quot;developer notes&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;change logs&amp;quot; in games or computer software. They give me an extra level of enjoyment over what I own, read, or use every day. What if, for example, dibbing and writing occurs from Saturday to Thursday, and Friday is spent writing justifications for your entries in the Talk: namespace? These justifications wouldn't be plot revealing... I wouldn't explain why I suggested that Windsor Creame didn't murder Daniel Mboya, but I could reveal that the Folktown Records newspaper was inspired by children's magazines like Ranger Rick or Highlights, or that I really wanted a grey area between &amp;quot;wait, he worked for the paper for 12 years, and he flips out to the point of murder?!&amp;quot; --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've sent Neel an email pointing him to this page. Perhaps he'll weigh in too. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:39, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about a mandatory OOG discussion note for each entry where each author explains any hidden subtext/gives a brief explanation of why they wrote how they did? Also, I agree a week might be too short once the enthusiasm wears off- what about requiring a draft entry at the end of the week, then a week for exploring the other new entries, looking for new opportunities to connect entries, asking questions, making suggestions, and refining your own work? --[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 09:53, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Continuing Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
The point about a discussion period is not that it takes away the room for debate, but that it fosters it. Not only can the debates still happen, but we can talk about the debates too, tell each other why we're debating in the manner that we are (if we so choose), etc. For example, I might be arguing just for the sake of argument, because I have an actual point, or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see your point about the RPG, and I don't want to take away from that--I want to just make sure we don't fall into pitholes of inconsistency. I also rather dislike the proliferation of so many new things without substance... who cares if Smoldock the Pinghopper fucknuzzled Gangliest Mifferfuddle III on -75/8/1 EC? Only Smoldock's girlfriend at the time, and that certainly wasn't me. I've been as guilty of the shallow invention problem as anyone, and I'm not even sure it's possible to fix now, but imagine if we decreed a rule saying that players can only create a set amount of new nomenclature per turn, or perhaps none at all. Do you think that we'd be able to get along? If you could only create one new thing to interact with the entire Ghyll world as it already exists, what would it be? That's a question which really gets you thinking, whereas the ability to create another Pluzzhucker The Hoobervlonking Ganglesmaking Fridgemagnet Collector seems to not be working as effectively. It's like being constrained by metre and rhyme in poetry--poems tend to come out better when you don't restart the basic building blocks from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, I'd really like to get to know the things that are currently in Ghyll and then proceed very cautiously to investigate what we've got. For every current entry, I'm sure that there are a huge portion that have secondary ideas that the authors are hoping to expand upon later in the game, and I'd like to know them. I suppose for something like Agony Uncle I didn't actually want to know because the mystery was the best part, but I think to a great extent that was an absolutely archetypal entry. If Andelphracian Lights has to any extent fuelled the trend of creating a set of boring assed organizations and other entities then I very much regret it--I wanted to first define the toenail clipper manufacturers, the strange luminous scum that you get on the underside of some rocks in the Evesque Valley, and the strange configuration of pips that you find in Fefferberries. I don't think I can point to a single entry in the game that I've really enjoyed yet, but a handful of them show some really great promising threads that I'd love to extract and have form the proper basis of Ghyll. That's why I keep raising the idea that after the round we all vote between us which our favourite parts are, and then just stick to those and start all the rest over from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I think that the justifications are certainly good ideas, and I'd probably support any extension to the turns' deadlines and reflection periods. But it's probably a good thing, as you've said yourself, to keep the turns fairly short as it'll force commitment from the players. If you consider my five days and five days proposal, though, note that the actual time in which we can edit is only five days, so that's less than the week that we have currently. And the ten days overall is only three days more than the current period for a turn. I don't think you can force justifications to be written on a single day--that's really restrictive and so people are just going to ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary: I'd like to foster out-of-game discussion of debates, restrict the shallow invention problem, instigate the five days and five days turn pattern, and require justifications to be written by players in the second five day period. I'd also like to hear what others think about these proposals. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 10:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Continuing Exasperations==&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred&amp;quot;''  worries me. If the plot nuance is only a plot nuance in your entry, then it's not a fact merely a suggestion, and you can't stop other players from taking it in their own direction. Hell, I could have said that, yes, Windsor murdered Daniel, but any scholar would be able to &amp;quot;introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;, creating a murder mystery because of newly discovered evidence. This is the challenge, and perversion, of our ideas, our truths... the inspiration and reason to play a game is arguably more important then the rules that govern it. Give and take is a part of RPGs - ''if things progress believably'', players will ''accept'' that the villian or plot device they just killed has come back from the dead, and the game master will be back on track with his previously devised plot. Of course, accidental or idiotic disregard, say that Besq boats are made out of cake pans and not trees, is call for foul - if it's not believable, if there's no justification, then it needs to be addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have both, and always, agreed on the proliferation of namealoo and macro entries - we both believe that micro entries, as per the archetypal &amp;quot;Agony uncle&amp;quot; are stronger, and we attempted to stifle macro entries by the grey area of dates, and a plea not to create new geographic locations. These pleas seem to have fallen on deaf ears, and arguably, we're having this discussion (again) because certain players aren't seeing the grander picture, aren't visualing the future of disparity, or simply don't care enough to start inwards and work outwards. I can stare at my desk, and if I were beginning an encyclopedia, describing things within five feet of me would take a rather long time to describe, and I could do each without needing to expound on its history or place of origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, we've now got a rather large area to work within, long running conflicts and history (which I exasperated in an attempt to shrink our geographic location, but also chose not to be formally recognized in an attempt to minimize its influence). None of this really gives me, as a scholar, and more importantly, an inhabitant, of the Ghyll world, any inspiration to wake up in the morning, drink a cup of fefferberry tea, read the week's Record, or tuck my daugher into her nursing sack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for timeframes, I personally think, and suspect others do as well, that deadlines should be based on anniversaries - every week, every two weeks, every Sunday, etc., etc - that'll be far easier to remember then &amp;quot;damn, has ten days gone by? is it Monday or Tuesday this week. oh bugge... oooO, J.Lo!&amp;quot;. I think we're (ultimately) in agreement with our justification/discussion suggestions, as well as macro/micro. Per your suggestion, just waiting for everyone else to weigh in. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 11:13, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A big part of the game is &amp;quot;The best laid plans of mice and men&amp;quot;. I was going to introduce a really good twist to the Daniel Mboya story (and it would have both been subtle and also tied it in to something else) but there was no way I could get that into the story of a sailor from around 200 years ago, and I considered it more anti-social to have a Mexican stand-off around who took the last undibbed entry and who got to create their own from scratch, so I didn't get to add to that story. Also, [[Betrothal March]] got defined in a way that goes completely against my ideas of it. But that's where the uncertainty comes in that makes playing this different to sitting at my computer writing poor speculative fiction. --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 14:11, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28297</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Cranee Historical Society</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Cranee_Historical_Society&amp;diff=28297"/>
		<updated>2004-09-18T18:08:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I've decided to work on some of the details of distances of Ghyll, using the facts that one nanit is &amp;quot;small&amp;quot; according to [[Bindlet Ball]], and 18 nanits seems quite large as the basis for Ghyll distance terminology. I feel that [[sugro-nanit]] is really quite an irritating term, but I've used it and made it equivalent to a mile to give it some more substance. Cranee is to be between the [[Evesque Valley]] and Folktown, eighteen miles from Folktown and twenty five from the [[Evesque Valley]]. I'd say that a nanit could well be 20cm; that'd make the boxes 3.6m across, which seems about right for huge magnetic whatsits. A mile [http://www.google.com/search?q=one+mile+in+centimetres&amp;amp;oe=UTF-8 is 160934.4cm] according to Google, so that means that there are 8046.72 nanits to a mile. Okay! That means that there are 144840.96 nanits between Cranee and Folktown, and 201168 nanits between Cranee and the Evesque Valley. To tie it back into earthly distances, I can say that Cranee -&amp;gt; Folktown is 18 * 5280 &amp;quot;paces&amp;quot;, and then hope that Ghyllians are roughly the same size as humans--and I think that they should be, but I guess there's no way of knowing. Everything in the Ghyll universe could be different, so it's a case of making all the relative distances work. This section should go in the Talk page.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
Ladies and not-so-ladies: this is, in some respects, a protest and parody entry. As I've already confided to Morbus, I'm slightly worried about the direction that Ghyll is taking on many levels, and I am here proposing a reform. The main problem is that we simply do not have enough reading and discussion time in contrast to the writing time. We have ten to twenty entries per turn: we've had eighteen this week, and it's simply too much too keep up with. Keeping up with the entries themselves isn't even the biggest problem, it's that it leads to a proliferation of entries that are written in complete isolation from one another.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I propose that instead of having a week of writing time and zero contemplation and discussion time, we should try to balance it out somewhat more. Perhaps every five turns, we could have a period of two weeks where no one is allowed to contribute to the canon, and we have to discuss what's been going on in the wiki, what we hope for the characters, where we want the game to develop. There is simply ''no'' out-of-game discussion about the game at the moment, whereas I think that ought to be its principal feature! I think this comes from us wanting to keep our ideas to ourselves so that we can surprise people when we publish them, but I also think it comes from us not planning our entries out in advance, ot wanting to seek others' input, and often from just rushing the entries full-stop. We had three entries in the half an hour before the turn's deadline, and that's silly: as Morbus suggests, we ought to place a moratorium on entries before the deadline, but I think that it should be quite a bit longer than Morbus is probably thinking. A week may be too short a time anyway, so I'm thinking about having five days to soak up the entries and discuss future directions, and then five days in which to write all our dibs. So the process will be day 1: dib; days 1-5: discuss and plan; days 6-10: write entries. That we had three entries in the last half an hour of the turn seems to indicate that a week is simply not long enough for people to catch up with Ghyll (and I must admit that this is partly spurred on by me having some commitments over the next week or so that's going to make it difficult to play Ghyll), though the period that we had for turn A seems too long.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Cranee was written quite ''extempore'', but when you look at the structure it's quite obvious that the top section is pedantry gone mad (the distance measures) and the rest is whimsy. I'm kinda irritated that people haven't been able to look into the easter eggs and puns etc. that I hid in my previous two entries, and I decided I wasn't going to waste the time on this entry doing the same--but I've also had not much time to check out the puns and cool references in other people's entries. Perhaps each time an entry is written up, people ought to discuss all the references in the Talk page instead of just leaving them all hidden. I don't think that just banging out entries every week can really be thought of as all that playing Ghyll consists of: you have to care about creating a large and consistent lexicon here, and I'm not sure what percentage of the players really feel that. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 03:44, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Just What is the Intent of Play?==&lt;br /&gt;
I hate to be a dork, but I'm not &amp;quot;feeling&amp;quot; the idea of a discussion period - it seems to change the focus of the game away from &amp;quot;let's challenge myself by letting others pervert my ideas&amp;quot; to &amp;quot;let's put ideas on the table and collectively write them together&amp;quot;. If that's the direction Neel wanted to take in his development of &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, then he wouldn't need to stress the facts that &amp;quot;you are cranky, opinionated, prejudiced, and eccentric&amp;quot;, and that &amp;quot;you can argue vociferously with the interpretation and introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;. If the intent of the OOG discussions is for everyone to agree on what the direction and goals are, and then to write fiction supporting those goals, we're removing the need for scholars to be cranky and prejudiced (they're just documenting what everyone agrees on), and also arguments and introduction (scholars don't need to argue because the OOG player discussions have already done that, and new facts don't need to be introduced because they've already been agreed upon in the discussion).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think that &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, the name, and specifically, &amp;quot;the RPG&amp;quot; is telling. If you've never played a game of Dungeons &amp;amp; Dragons or anything similar, then you don't know about the challenge between the players and the game master. The game master has a story inside his head, and it contains plots, characters, and locations. The players are playing in ''his'' world, but the plot is now dictated by ''their'' actions. It is ''very'' common for the GM to make this wonderful plot line, and then to have the players accidentally (unbeknownst to their knowledge) kill a crucial figure, thus destroying the intricate events the GM had planned. ''This is the challenge, and fun, of roleplaying games.'' Sure, game masters can say &amp;quot;uh, don't do that&amp;quot;, but that is generally vilified: players don't want to play a game ''on the rails'', where their actions are constrained to set points and results - they want the plot to revolve around them, for they are the reason the game is being played.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In &amp;quot;Lexicon the RPG&amp;quot;, we are all players, but we are also all game masters. We game master the entries we write, presumably with a world view, but then the other players pervert our ideas with their own course of action. As game masters, we're constrained by the rules to ''accept'' what the players do with our ideas - as players, we're vindicated knowing we're not ''on the rails''.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With all that said, I do agree, however, that the three entries immediately before midnight is a very bad and slippery slope: going back to the RPG, it'd be like the game master inventing his plot line for the night's gaming session five minutes before it happens. Players ''will'' notice that you've come unprepared - the game stops being fun, and the effort stops being made.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I do think, however, that  ''justification'' could be a decent advocate of ''contemplation''. One of my favorite pleasures is listening to DVD commentaries, or to read &amp;quot;developer notes&amp;quot; or &amp;quot;change logs&amp;quot; in games or computer software. They give me an extra level of enjoyment over what I own, read, or use every day. What if, for example, dibbing and writing occurs from Saturday to Thursday, and Friday is spent writing justifications for your entries in the Talk: namespace? These justifications wouldn't be plot revealing... I wouldn't explain why I suggested that Windsor Creame didn't murder Daniel Mboya, but I could reveal that the Folktown Records newspaper was inspired by children's magazines like Ranger Rick or Highlights, or that I really wanted a grey area between &amp;quot;wait, he worked for the paper for 12 years, and he flips out to the point of murder?!&amp;quot; --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I've sent Neel an email pointing him to this page. Perhaps he'll weigh in too. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 09:39, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What about a mandatory OOG discussion note for each entry where each author explains any hidden subtext/gives a brief explanation of why they wrote how they did? Also, I agree a week might be too short once the enthusiasm wears off- what about requiring a draft entry at the end of the week, then a week for exploring the other new entries, looking for new opportunities to connect entries, asking questions, making suggestions, and refining your own work? --[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 09:53, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==A Continuing Call To Order==&lt;br /&gt;
The point about a discussion period is not that it takes away the room for debate, but that it fosters it. Not only can the debates still happen, but we can talk about the debates too, tell each other why we're debating in the manner that we are (if we so choose), etc. For example, I might be arguing just for the sake of argument, because I have an actual point, or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I see your point about the RPG, and I don't want to take away from that--I want to just make sure we don't fall into pitholes of inconsistency. I also rather dislike the proliferation of so many new things without substance... who cares if Smoldock the Pinghopper fucknuzzled Gangliest Mifferfuddle III on -75/8/1 EC? Only Smoldock's girlfriend at the time, and that certainly wasn't me. I've been as guilty of the shallow invention problem as anyone, and I'm not even sure it's possible to fix now, but imagine if we decreed a rule saying that players can only create a set amount of new nomenclature per turn, or perhaps none at all. Do you think that we'd be able to get along? If you could only create one new thing to interact with the entire Ghyll world as it already exists, what would it be? That's a question which really gets you thinking, whereas the ability to create another Pluzzhucker The Hoobervlonking Ganglesmaking Fridgemagnet Collector seems to not be working as effectively. It's like being constrained by metre and rhyme in poetry--poems tend to come out better when you don't restart the basic building blocks from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words, I'd really like to get to know the things that are currently in Ghyll and then proceed very cautiously to investigate what we've got. For every current entry, I'm sure that there are a huge portion that have secondary ideas that the authors are hoping to expand upon later in the game, and I'd like to know them. I suppose for something like Agony Uncle I didn't actually want to know because the mystery was the best part, but I think to a great extent that was an absolutely archetypal entry. If Andelphracian Lights has to any extent fuelled the trend of creating a set of boring assed organizations and other entities then I very much regret it--I wanted to first define the toenail clipper manufacturers, the strange luminous scum that you get on the underside of some rocks in the Evesque Valley, and the strange configuration of pips that you find in Fefferberries. I don't think I can point to a single entry in the game that I've really enjoyed yet, but a handful of them show some really great promising threads that I'd love to extract and have form the proper basis of Ghyll. That's why I keep raising the idea that after the round we all vote between us which our favourite parts are, and then just stick to those and start all the rest over from scratch.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
So I think that the justifications are certainly good ideas, and I'd probably support any extension to the turns' deadlines and reflection periods. But it's probably a good thing, as you've said yourself, to keep the turns fairly short as it'll force commitment from the players. If you consider my five days and five days proposal, though, note that the actual time in which we can edit is only five days, so that's less than the week that we have currently. And the ten days overall is only three days more than the current period for a turn. I don't think you can force justifications to be written on a single day--that's really restrictive and so people are just going to ignore it.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In summary: I'd like to foster out-of-game discussion of debates, restrict the shallow invention problem, instigate the five days and five days turn pattern, and require justifications to be written by players in the second five day period. I'd also like to hear what others think about these proposals. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 10:30, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Continuing Exasperations==&lt;br /&gt;
''&amp;quot;Or because I'm trying to protect some plot nuance which is being marred&amp;quot;''  worries me. If the plot nuance is only a plot nuance in your entry, then it's not a fact merely a suggestion, and you can't stop other players from taking it in their own direction. Hell, I could have said that, yes, Windsor murdered Daniel, but any scholar would be able to &amp;quot;introduce new facts that shade the interpretation&amp;quot;, creating a murder mystery because of newly discovered evidence. This is the challenge, and perversion, of our ideas, our truths... the inspiration and reason to play a game is arguably more important then the rules that govern it. Give and take is a part of RPGs - ''if things progress believably'', players will ''accept'' that the villian or plot device they just killed has come back from the dead, and the game master will be back on track with his previously devised plot. Of course, accidental or idiotic disregard, say that Besq boats are made out of cake pans and not trees, is call for foul - if it's not believable, if there's no justification, then it needs to be addressed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
We have both, and always, agreed on the proliferation of namealoo and macro entries - we both believe that micro entries, as per the archetypal &amp;quot;Agony uncle&amp;quot; are stronger, and we attempted to stifle macro entries by the grey area of dates, and a plea not to create new geographic locations. These pleas seem to have fallen on deaf ears, and arguably, we're having this discussion (again) because certain players aren't seeing the grander picture, aren't visualing the future of disparity, or simply don't care enough to start inwards and work outwards. I can stare at my desk, and if I were beginning an encyclopedia, describing things within five feet of me would take a rather long time to describe, and I could do each without needing to expound on its history or place of origin.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Instead, we've now got a rather large area to work within, long running conflicts and history (which I exasperated in an attempt to shrink our geographic location, but also chose not to be formally recognized in an attempt to minimize its influence). None of this really gives me, as a scholar, and more importantly, an inhabitant, of the Ghyll world, any inspiration to wake up in the morning, drink a cup of fefferberry tea, read the week's Record, or tuck my daugher into her nursing sack.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As for timeframes, I personally think, and suspect others do as well, that deadlines should be based on anniversaries - every week, every two weeks, every Sunday, etc., etc - that'll be far easier to remember then &amp;quot;damn, has ten days gone by? is it Monday or Tuesday this week. oh bugge... oooO, J.Lo!&amp;quot;. I think we're (ultimately) in agreement with our justification/discussion suggestions, as well as macro/micro. Per your suggestion, just waiting for everyone else to weigh in. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 11:13, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A big part of the game is &amp;quot;The best laid plans of mice and men&amp;quot;. I was going to introduce a really good twist to the Daniel Mboya story (and it would have both been subtle and also tied it in to something else) but there was no way I could get that into the story of a sailor from around 200 years ago, and I considered it more anti-social to have a Mexican stand-off around who took the last undibbed entry and who got to create their own from scratch, so I didn't get to add to that story. Also, [[Betrothal March]] got defined in a way that goes completely against my ideas of it. But that's where the uncertainty comes in that makes playing this different to sitting at my computer writing poor speculative fiction.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Captain_Riquiras&amp;diff=23150</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Captain Riquiras</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Captain_Riquiras&amp;diff=23150"/>
		<updated>2004-09-18T14:26:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: First Draft&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Captain Tuta Riquiras (sometimes transliterated as Rikiras or Requiras) was a famous buccaneer and smuggler whose memory is still invoked by Besq Boat sailors, particularly those who pride themselves in being somehow apart from the rest of society (which is most of them). The swear word (I apologise for using the term, but academic needs should prevail even over manners) “breakas” comes from sailors swearing oaths “by Riquiras”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
As remarkable as his feats as a sailor were he would probably be unknown of outside of Besq circles were it not for his discovery of “Captain Riquiras’ Idol” also called the “Brass Hell” in -159{{EC}}. This artefact isn’t actually brass, but some unknown metal of unnatural strength and lightness covered with gold leaf (though it is far more even than any gold leaf method known to artisans today). Engraved on the Idol is a horrific image that is disturbing and stomach-turning even in comparison to other images of the [[Alezan pantheon]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Riquiras said that his men found an object while diving in the shallows of the [[Dagger Seas]]. They were unable to remove the object, but took from it the Idol, which was affixed to one side. The engraving proved disturbing even to some of Riquiras’ hardened buccaneers. One part of the engraving is said to resemble the object they had found on the sea bed, and they claimed that if it were to scale this would mean that the two deities standing in front of it would be slightly larger than Ghyllians.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The deities themselves are more offensive to the eye than most Alezan deities because they are so have the up-right four-limbed appearance of Ghyllians. Some have suggested that they may not be deities themselves but rather some perverse creation of the deities performed in mockery of our natural forms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The taller of the two holds his right hand high in a position of command or perhaps performing some curse on the viewer. The shorter stands apart from him slightly and seems to bear an expression of contempt.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Whether the couple are lovers, parent and child, or two aspects of the same figure has been the subject of much controversy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Other parts of the same drawing appear to be sigils for some dark form of [[morphomancy]] and their study was forbidden for a long time.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Riquiras himself seemed immune to the psychological impact of the image and had it painted onto the sails of his boats, to strike terror into his enemies. This was an unpopular decision amongst his crew and they murdered him 2 years later.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For a long time we debated whether we should portray the image in these pages, before deciding to do so, but to seal the pages to avoid accidental viewing. Please, unless you are a student of the iconography of the [[Alezan pantheon]], and hence in some measure conditioned to such horrors stop reading this article. I am smart enough to realise that many young and foolish people will look up this article in the encyclopaedia because they have heard of the Idol and curiosity has got the better of them. I plead now with such readers to reconsider, you will never be able to “unsee” once you have seen.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
With that caution in mind, you can turn the page and break the seal:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[http://www.hackcraft.net/artefact.jpeg Captain Riquiras' Idol]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Captain_Riquiras&amp;diff=23149</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Captain Riquiras</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Captain_Riquiras&amp;diff=23149"/>
		<updated>2004-09-18T12:52:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Ooops, hadn't logged in.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;dibbed -- [[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 08:52, 18 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Quezlarian_Numerals&amp;diff=27406</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Quezlarian Numerals</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Quezlarian_Numerals&amp;diff=27406"/>
		<updated>2004-09-15T22:47:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;Excerpted from the [[Folktown Records]], edition 578.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;quot;When, and how, did Ghyll develop Quezlar numerals?&amp;quot; - Morphous Ibb, age 7.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;Tim Timperton replies: &amp;quot;Like many things in Ghyll, they were designed to cover up the aesthetic problems of core script. Quezlarian (or Quezlar) numerals, contrary to popular belief, were invented by Quezlar 6. According to recent research by the [[Council for Quezlarian Research]], Quezlar 6 was so upset with the shape of the core script number in his name that he invented a whole new optional numbering system: Quezlar numerals. Delightfully, VI was the nickname of his wife, Violetta, which explains why 6 is spelled VI in Quezlarian numerals.&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Intriguingly enough, the secretive [[Council for Quezlarian Research]] emphatically deny the above claim! But we need not doubt it; Tim Timperton was a high ranking member of the council before taking up post as an [[agony uncle]] in the [[Folktown Records]]. Why he would change career from a Quezlarian researcher to an [[agony uncle]], one can only guess...&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Citations''': [[Agony uncle]], [[Council for Quezlarian Research]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 11:44, 20 Aug 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:Other]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
I really must protest the use of the term [[Agony uncle]] to describe a fine upstanding lad like Tim Timperton.  As my ''esteemed'' fellow researcher is obviously aware, an &amp;quot;[[Agony uncle]]&amp;quot; is a '''derogatory''' term applied to employees of the [[Folktown Records]] weekly newspaper.  While I admit that Tim works at that fine establishment, he is a fine, upstanding lad.  Not at all like that pile of [[splak]] father of his, [[Bysted Timperton]].  I should know, I play cards with the old dog every Tuesday and he cheats.&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]] 01:34, 3 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not living close enough to the Folktown Records offices to have ever heard the term &amp;quot;[[Agony uncle|agony uncle]]&amp;quot; used in a derogatory manner, I stand by my use of the phrase as it stands in the entry. The author of the &amp;quot;[[Agony uncle]]&amp;quot; entry should've noted that in more rural areas the phrase has lost its pejorative connotations, though he was probably as unaware of that as I was the inverse. --[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]] 13:03, 3 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I think you'll find that it is more a matter of the phrase having not yet '''gained''' the pejorative connotations it gained in less backward areas. Prior to around -3{{EC}} the Folktown Records actually used the term itself, but this was becoming more and more of a sore point with its staff since it had gained its derogatory nuance at least 5 years previously. --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 18:47, 15 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22791</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22791"/>
		<updated>2004-09-15T22:30:38Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Linking &amp;quot;Alezan&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts became known, otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, and artistic life including, above all, the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear, but upon her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11 {{EC}}, she was apparently 19 years of age. There being no record of her before than, her name was assumed to be a pseudonym; while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11, and though the name has again returned to popularity this year (recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies), it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bethany is, of course, a feminine version of the common name Bedanant; Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot. Of course, since using a pseudonym is common in Ghyll (all the more so amongst those who move in artistic circles), she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable save to add to the mystique surrounding her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate, it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work, both in the rôle of muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s still rather daring ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However, she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period still brought scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, then a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly, he left that knot of people and approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to [[Alezan]] with a childhood friend. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[Burnflies]] and which had fainted, Foye leapt upon them, forcibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow, and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped, Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusely from his nose, and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising beneath both eyes. After the wedding, Foye and Sinch were the very model of a happily married couple, and Mboya’s involvement with Sinch seemed less likely... she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch would later enjoy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time, Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly, in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier emphasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes). The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like that of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mboya was soon reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet Ball]] players, and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied or ignored the rumours, but some openly admitted to such affairs, like the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship between himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9 {{EC}} that the first writings of Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that at best led to hard to verify results. The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge, and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and [[Occultologists|occultological]] nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, seems to match the proportion of male and female lovers Mboya was said to have taken. In fairness, a further comment scrawled below the first refutes this, and yet another states “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5 {{EC}}, it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring. Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;''The question:'' My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true? ''And the reply:'' I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3 {{EC}}, it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll, let alone with posing for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly, it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in  lumograms. Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2 {{EC}}, he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) and afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and tendency to scratch his genitals with his injured hand every few minutes – claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Citations''': [[Burnflies]], [[Betrothal march]], [[Lumogram]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 11:41, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bethany was not of the privileged élite. Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder, and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars, to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona, doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story? --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 19:42, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Not at all. I've studied the original and current incarnations of the Tarkerk Corps rather extensively. Traditionally, this storied service has embraced, at least in theory, the iconoclastic but eminently sensible practice of promoting officers out of the enlisted ranks. Because they work in very small and highly specialized groups, this - at least in theory- helps ensure that authority is accompanied by experience. But in recent times, a relatively green recruit can in fact advance to the highest levels of leadership rather quickly, if the right amount of expensive education is noted in their records. One example of this decay is how it has even become fashionable in some circles to have a son or daughter- highly placed, of course- in this esteemed corps. But for such a great mind to not even ascend to the rank of brasshat over an entire career, esp. in the &amp;quot;old corps,&amp;quot; is an oversight that borders on criminal, to my mind. I wonder if in fact he actually achieved some higher rank, but lost it due to some undisclosed indiscretion. Now put down your sword, you can put an eye out with that thing! --[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 21:43, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=User:Dok/Notepad&amp;diff=29502</id>
		<title>User:Dok/Notepad</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=User:Dok/Notepad&amp;diff=29502"/>
		<updated>2004-09-15T22:11:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Suggestion&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;I am planning to document a system of measurment for the next turn.  I will put some story around the system.  The outline follows:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rules of Distance ===&lt;br /&gt;
*1 lele = 1000 unanit&lt;br /&gt;
*1 unanit = 10 nanit&lt;br /&gt;
*1 nanit = 10 inanit&lt;br /&gt;
*1 inanit = 10 kinanit&lt;br /&gt;
*1 lele = 1000 unanit = 10,000 nanit = 100,000 inanit = 1,000,000 kinanit&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rules of Mass ===&lt;br /&gt;
*A cube of water 1 nanit x 1 nanit x 1 nanit will have a mass of 1000 gyup&lt;br /&gt;
*A cube of water 1 inanit x 1 inanit x 1 inanit will have a mass of 1 gyup&lt;br /&gt;
*1000 gyup = 1 lugyup&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rules of Volume ===&lt;br /&gt;
*A cube measuring 1 nanit x 1 nanit x 1 nanit will have a volume of 1 wurp&lt;br /&gt;
*A cube measuring 1 unanit x 1 unanit x 1 unanit will have a volume of 1,000 wurp.  1,000 wurp of water will have a mass of 1,000,000 gyup or 1,000 lugyup&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rules of Temperature ===&lt;br /&gt;
*Water will freeze at 0 Yip.&lt;br /&gt;
*Water will boil at 100 Yip.&lt;br /&gt;
This rule is subject to change depending on location. Scholars have noted that this is not constant but varies. It is true when at the coast, but will change in the mountains. The reason behind this inconsistency is unclear.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Rules of Prefixes ===&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table class=&amp;quot;ghyllidx&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th style=&amp;quot;width:50%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Multiplier&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Prefix&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X1000&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;lu&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X100&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ku&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X10&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;u&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-1&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;i&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-2&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;ki&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;X10&amp;lt;sup&amp;gt;-3&amp;lt;/sup&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td Align=&amp;quot;Center&amp;quot;&amp;gt;li&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Comment ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I was thinking of doing the same thing, but with utterly undecimalised systems (figured it would be more fun that way) --&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 18:11, 15 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22786</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22786"/>
		<updated>2004-09-15T00:48:53Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Rewording gender balance a bit. It's still cumbersom.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts became known, otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, and artistic life including, above all, the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear, but upon her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11 {{EC}}, she was apparently 19 years of age. There being no record of her before than, her name was assumed to be a pseudonym; while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11, and though the name has again returned to popularity this year (recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies), it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bethany is, of course, a feminine version of the common name Bedanant; Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot. Of course, since using a pseudonym is common in Ghyll (all the more so amongst those who move in artistic circles), she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable save to add to the mystique surrounding her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate, it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work, both in the rôle of muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s still rather daring ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However, she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period still brought scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, then a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly, he left that knot of people and approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[Burnflies]] and which had fainted, Foye leapt upon them, forcibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow, and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped, Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusely from his nose, and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising beneath both eyes. After the wedding, Foye and Sinch were the very model of a happily married couple, and Mboya’s involvement with Sinch seemed less likely... she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch would later enjoy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time, Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly, in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier emphasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes). The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like that of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mboya was soon reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet Ball]] players, and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied or ignored the rumours, but some openly admitted to such affairs, like the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship between himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9 {{EC}} that the first writings of Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that at best led to hard to verify results. The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge, and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and [[Occultologists|occultological]] nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, seems to match the proportion of male and female lovers Mboya was said to have taken. In fairness, a further comment scrawled below the first refutes this, and yet another states “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5 {{EC}}, it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring. Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;''The question:'' My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true? ''And the reply:'' I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3 {{EC}}, it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll, let alone with posing for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly, it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in  lumograms. Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2 {{EC}}, he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) and afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and tendency to scratch his genitals with his injured hand every few minutes – claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Citations''': [[Burnflies]], [[Betrothal march]], [[Lumogram]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 11:41, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bethany was not of the privileged élite. Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder, and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars, to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona, doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story? --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 19:42, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22785</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22785"/>
		<updated>2004-09-15T00:30:52Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: More linkage&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts became known, otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, and artistic life including, above all, the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear, but upon her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11 {{EC}}, she was apparently 19 years of age. There being no record of her before than, her name was assumed to be a pseudonym; while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11, and though the name has again returned to popularity this year (recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies), it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bethany is, of course, a feminine version of the common name Bedanant; Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot. Of course, since using a pseudonym is common in Ghyll (all the more so amongst those who move in artistic circles), she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable save to add to the mystique surrounding her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate, it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work, both in the rôle of muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s still rather daring ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However, she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period still brought scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, then a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly, he left that knot of people and approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[Burnflies]] and which had fainted, Foye leapt upon them, forcibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow, and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped, Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusely from his nose, and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising beneath both eyes. After the wedding, Foye and Sinch were the very model of a happily married couple, and Mboya’s involvement with Sinch seemed less likely... she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch would later enjoy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time, Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly, in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier emphasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes). The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like that of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mboya was soon reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet Ball]] players, and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied or ignored the rumours, but some openly admitted to such affairs, like the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship between himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9 {{EC}} that the first writings of Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that at best led to hard to verify results. The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge, and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and [[Occultologists|occultological]] nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers. In fairness, a further comment scrawled below the first refutes this, and yet another states “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5 {{EC}}, it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring. Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;''The question:'' My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true? ''And the reply:'' I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3 {{EC}}, it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll, let alone with posing for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly, it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in  lumograms. Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2 {{EC}}, he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) and afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and tendency to scratch his genitals with his injured hand every few minutes – claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Citations''': [[Burnflies]], [[Betrothal march]], [[Lumogram]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 11:41, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bethany was not of the privileged élite. Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder, and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars, to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona, doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story? --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 19:42, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22784</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22784"/>
		<updated>2004-09-15T00:28:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts became known, otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, and artistic life including, above all, the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear, but upon her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11 {{EC}}, she was apparently 19 years of age. There being no record of her before than, her name was assumed to be a pseudonym; while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11, and though the name has again returned to popularity this year (recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies), it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bethany is, of course, a feminine version of the common name Bedanant; Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot. Of course, since using a pseudonym is common in Ghyll (all the more so amongst those who move in artistic circles), she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable save to add to the mystique surrounding her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate, it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work, both in the rôle of muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s still rather daring ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However, she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period still brought scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, then a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly, he left that knot of people and approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[Burnflies]] and which had fainted, Foye leapt upon them, forcibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow, and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped, Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusely from his nose, and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising beneath both eyes. After the wedding, Foye and Sinch were the very model of a happily married couple, and Mboya’s involvement with Sinch seemed less likely... she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch would later enjoy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time, Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly, in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier emphasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes). The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;&amp;quot;Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like that of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…&amp;quot;&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Mboya was soon reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet Ball]] players, and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied or ignored the rumours, but some openly admitted to such affairs, like the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship between himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9 {{EC}} that the first writings of Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that at best led to hard to verify results. The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge, and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers. In fairness, a further comment scrawled below the first refutes this, and yet another states “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5 {{EC}}, it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring. Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;blockquote&amp;gt;''The question:'' My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true? ''And the reply:'' I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&amp;lt;/blockquote&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3 {{EC}}, it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll, let alone with posing for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly, it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in  lumograms. Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2 {{EC}}, he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) and afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and tendency to scratch his genitals with his injured hand every few minutes – claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Citations''': [[Burnflies]], [[Betrothal march]], [[Lumogram]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 11:41, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
----&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bethany was not of the privileged élite. Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder, and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars, to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona, doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story? --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 19:42, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28068</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28068"/>
		<updated>2004-09-15T00:01:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: /* Bethany was not of the priveledged élite. */&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Out-Of-Game Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bethany was not of the priveledged élite. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story? --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 19:42, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guys - in-game discussion should occur at the bottom of the entry itself - these Talk: pages are just for Out of Game discussions concerning logistics, continuity errors, and so on and so forth. Wanna copy/move your comments above onto your entry? --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 19:46, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ah right. If Bast wants to move her comment there and keep it role-played then I would like to move mine too, but it would be Bast's perogative as the author of the first such comment to decide I think.--&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 20:00, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28067</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28067"/>
		<updated>2004-09-15T00:00:23Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Out-Of-Game Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bethany was not of the priveledged élite. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.--&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 20:00, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story? --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 19:42, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guys - in-game discussion should occur at the bottom of the entry itself - these Talk: pages are just for Out of Game discussions concerning logistics, continuity errors, and so on and so forth. Wanna copy/move your comments above onto your entry? --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 19:46, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ah right. If Bast wants to move her comment there and keep it role-played then I would like to move mine too, but it would be Bast's perogative as the author of the first such comment to decide I think.--&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 20:00, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28066</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28066"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T23:59:11Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Out-Of-Game Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bethany was not of the priveledged élite. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story? --[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 19:42, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Guys - in-game discussion should occur at the bottom of the entry itself - these Talk: pages are just for Out of Game discussions concerning logistics, continuity errors, and so on and so forth. Wanna copy/move your comments above onto your entry? --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 19:46, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ah right. If Bast wants to move her comment there and keep it role-played then I would like to move mine too, but it would be Bast's perogative as the author of the first such comment to decide I think.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28064</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28064"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T23:42:35Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Out-Of-Game Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bethany was not of the priveledged élite. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story? --&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 19:42, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28063</id>
		<title>Ghyll talk:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll_talk:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=28063"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T23:41:22Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Bethany was not of the priveledged élite.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Out-Of-Game Discussion==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Nice entry. Surprising such a brilliant mind retired at the lowly rank of spearholder. But that's the Tarkerk Corps, for you, I guess- full of brilliant people accomplishing great things, yet so few rose to the ranks of the elite dullards who ostensibly led them.--[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]] 11:57, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Bethany was not of the priveledged élite. ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Well, while the ranks of Swordwielder, Spearholder and Reconaissance Background Magnetic Field Mapper are considered lowly for those commissioned into the forces (and recent moves to remove the ranks references to obsolete military rôles shows how little regard they have for the history and honour of those ranks) for someone who rose through the enlisted ranks to them they are still a matter of some pride. The fact that he kept the rank into retirement shows that Jan ver Daath was such a man.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
He had indeed a great mind, but a deeply perverse one, and while his ideas influence much of the way we currently think as scholars to express them primarily through the production of mildly pornographic material and through seducing people under a false persona doesn't indicate a balanced mind, even if it is a great one.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
But then I suspect you share scepticism here and that you are indeed the author of the &amp;quot;putrid body&amp;quot; comment I noted in the article. Is this the case? Has there been any inappropriate pressure put upon you by the more putrid of our colleagues (which would be perhaps most of them)? Would you be interested in selling your story?&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=User:Talliesin&amp;diff=30164</id>
		<title>User:Talliesin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=User:Talliesin&amp;diff=30164"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T16:28:58Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Talliesin, Ghyll Scholar==&lt;br /&gt;
After 16 years of research in Folktown University Talliesin completed his doctoral thesis &amp;quot;To say or not, an exploration of etiquette with particular focus of whether you should let a woman know her underwear is showing or that her clothes are practically transparent when the light is right&amp;quot;. 2 years later he sued the University and they reluctantly handed him his degree. It was however clear that he would not become a professor and his academic career was destroyed.&lt;br /&gt;
Failing remarkably to commit suicide through a combination of hanging, poisoning, and bloodletting he felt he had no better choice than to engage in the kind of petty sensationalist journalism he had been accused of engaging in when refused his doctorate. When the encyclopædia began seeking authors he saw this as a way to work his way back into more serious writing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Talliesin, Person==&lt;br /&gt;
Didn't get as far as a degree. Politely averts his gaze. Despises sensationalist journalism.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=User:Talliesin&amp;diff=30163</id>
		<title>User:Talliesin</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=User:Talliesin&amp;diff=30163"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T16:28:01Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Talliesin, Ghyll Scholar==&lt;br /&gt;
After 16 years of research in Folktown University Talliesin completed his doctoral thesis &amp;quot;To say or not, an exploration of etiquette with particular focus of whether you should let a woman know her underwear is showing&amp;quot;. 2 years later he sued the University and they reluctantly handed him his degree. It was however clear that he would not become a professor and his academic career was destroyed.&lt;br /&gt;
Failing remarkably to commit suicide through a combination of hanging, poisoning, and bloodletting he felt he had no better choice than to engage in the kind of petty sensationalist journalism he had been accused of engaging in when refused his doctorate. When the encyclopædia began seeking authors he saw this as a way to work his way back into more serious writing.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Talliesin, Person==&lt;br /&gt;
Didn't get as far as a degree. Politely averts his gaze. Despises sensationalist journalism.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:WhoIsWho&amp;diff=30482</id>
		<title>Ghyll:WhoIsWho</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:WhoIsWho&amp;diff=30482"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:58:42Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Added Mikel Mboya&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Who's Who in Ghyll?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Listing in alphabetical order, not by surname, since some entries (Quezlar 6) don't have a known surname, and Ghyll sorting procedures for names--and even baby name giving procedures--are currently unknown. Note that the short descriptions below are NOT indicative of &amp;quot;all we know&amp;quot;... we just didn't duplicate data available elsewhere in the Encyclopedia. Consider using the search engine to find more information about a particular name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Alarius]]''' - A renowned freethinker, philosopher and artist; son of [[Arariax]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Aminfarances]]''' - Founder of the [[Aminfarances Institute of Science and Technomancy]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Andelphracia''' - (flourised -300 EC) Mayoress of Fylesgate, inventor of [[Andelphracian Lights]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Arariax]]''' - (born c. -280 EC) One of Ghyll's most influential poets.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Awal''' - The first to apply [[Jesper's constant]] to the study of spelgof emulsions.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Baron Claude Lloyd Albert Smallwood]]''' - Wine producer, ex-husband of [[Bavarian Creame]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Bartmoss|Bartmoss]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, ex-member of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bavarian Creame]]''' - Wife of Windsor Creame.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bethany Mboya]]''' - “We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya”.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Blivingdel''' - An interpreter of Ternary Script.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bobby Shwarmph|Bobby &amp;quot;Robert&amp;quot; Shwarmph]]''' - Runs the [[Aliens Everywhere]] mag, lives near [[Alezan]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bordingbras''' - ''Mere bagatelle in the hands of a Fate'' (cf. [[Battle of Barnum Stones]], [[Bordingbras his hatt!]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bunny Hutch''' - Famed performance artist.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bursine the 14th''' - Creator of the [[Bursine Calendar]], [[Hive-Lord]] of the [[Nitenmangrey]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bysted Timperton]]''' - Vice Chairman of the [[Council for Quezlarian Research]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Captain Riquiras]]''' - Legendary buccaneer and smuggler. Sailor of [[Besq Boats]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Casostates''' - Was to judge a contest of smilching prowess at the [[Battle of Barnum Stones|Barnum Stones]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Corvin Axehand''' - Moved the [[Battle of Barnum Stones|Barnum Stones]] to Stindersgrough in -158 {{EC}}. &lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Crschmidt|Christopher Schmidt]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Daniel Mboya''' - Nephew of Windsor Creame; died recently in mysterious circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Dok|Dok]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''&amp;quot;Easy&amp;quot; Lizzard''' - An associate and confidante of [[Bobby Shwarmph]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Edvard von Craghelm]]''' - (died -20 EC) Famous [[Anaximancer]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Tehwalrus|Edward Shwarmph]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, quasi-science lover.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Pixel|Eric Vitiello]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, ex-member of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]], and farmer in Dandarth.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Arnia|Fingest Arnia]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, [[Amphitheatre aristocracy]] member.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Garth Haversham''' - Managing Editor of the [[Folktown Records]] on -7/9/15 EC.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Gibbous Saunders''' - (born -18 EC) Wrote to the [[Folktown Records]], published in edition 312.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Hemoss The Heretic''' - Issuer of two Great Heresies (cf. [[Altoxian Bulb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Honuphrius''' - Brother of the Lantern and denouncer of [[Arariax]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Izadora Gutschtup''' - Actress, Alezan or [[Bobby Shwarmph|Shwarmph]] childbearer depending on who you ask.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Jan ver Daath''' - Veteran of the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]. Retired from the [[Tarkherk Corps]] with a rank of Spearholder. He fooled us all.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, has written for the [[Folktown Records]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]''' - Neutral Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Juzh_Iruk|Juzh Iruk]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Litvia''' - A [[Paramount Queen]], joined with Bursine the 14th.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Madam Calvian''' - Neighbour to a [[Folktown Records]] employee.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Robbi|Makarii Spitignev]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, [[Iganefta]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Margaret Widderson''' - One of the foremost contemporary Andelight craftswomen.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Meldersen]]''' - [[Awal shrinkage]] scholar, has a famous axiom: &amp;quot;It's downside up!&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:D8uv|Melik Fizzuo]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and Fadr resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Mikel Mboya''' - A writer of little consequence. Mboya is a common name.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Monty Thabot''' - Vice Chairman of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]]'s Steering Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Morphous Ibb''' - (born -8 EC) Wrote to the [[Folktown Records]], published in edition 578.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Oblibestircus''' - Minor scholar, not of the ''maior et sanior pars''.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Phennella''' - Member of the [[Cranee Historical Society]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and self-styled &amp;quot;doctor&amp;quot; of occult studies.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Professor Altoxian]]''' - Inventor of the [[Altoxian Bulb]], [[Iganefta]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Prothall|Prothall]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Quezlar 6''' - (flourised -300 EC) Created [[Quezlarian Numerals]], crossed Elminster Mire.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]''' - (born -58 EC) Ghyll Lexicon scholar and [[Evesque Valley]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Rancticirchiretic''' - Scholar of the [[Nitenmangrey]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Revelerax''' - Former student of the [[Brothers of the Lantern]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Salerny Redthighs''' - Chief of the Looliers during the [[Battle of Barnum Stones]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and Tomlinson Bridleway restoration campaigner.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Siam Sinch''' - Artist, and daughter of [[Bavarian Creame]] from her previous marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Supetupheraraphes]]''' - Historian and coiner of the term &amp;quot;[[Aquentravalkeration|aquentravalkeration]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Deusx|Tamlin Moon]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tim Timperton''' - A [[Folktown Records]] writer and ex-member of the [[Council for Quezlarian Research]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Windsor Creame''' - (born -58 EC) Writer for the [[Folktown Records]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:WhoIsWho&amp;diff=30481</id>
		<title>Ghyll:WhoIsWho</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:WhoIsWho&amp;diff=30481"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:57:06Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Added Jan ver Daath&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Who's Who in Ghyll?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Listing in alphabetical order, not by surname, since some entries (Quezlar 6) don't have a known surname, and Ghyll sorting procedures for names--and even baby name giving procedures--are currently unknown. Note that the short descriptions below are NOT indicative of &amp;quot;all we know&amp;quot;... we just didn't duplicate data available elsewhere in the Encyclopedia. Consider using the search engine to find more information about a particular name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Alarius]]''' - A renowned freethinker, philosopher and artist; son of [[Arariax]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Aminfarances]]''' - Founder of the [[Aminfarances Institute of Science and Technomancy]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Andelphracia''' - (flourised -300 EC) Mayoress of Fylesgate, inventor of [[Andelphracian Lights]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Arariax]]''' - (born c. -280 EC) One of Ghyll's most influential poets.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Awal''' - The first to apply [[Jesper's constant]] to the study of spelgof emulsions.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Baron Claude Lloyd Albert Smallwood]]''' - Wine producer, ex-husband of [[Bavarian Creame]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Bartmoss|Bartmoss]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, ex-member of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bavarian Creame]]''' - Wife of Windsor Creame.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bethany Mboya]]''' - “We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya”.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Blivingdel''' - An interpreter of Ternary Script.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bobby Shwarmph|Bobby &amp;quot;Robert&amp;quot; Shwarmph]]''' - Runs the [[Aliens Everywhere]] mag, lives near [[Alezan]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bordingbras''' - ''Mere bagatelle in the hands of a Fate'' (cf. [[Battle of Barnum Stones]], [[Bordingbras his hatt!]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bunny Hutch''' - Famed performance artist.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bursine the 14th''' - Creator of the [[Bursine Calendar]], [[Hive-Lord]] of the [[Nitenmangrey]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bysted Timperton]]''' - Vice Chairman of the [[Council for Quezlarian Research]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Captain Riquiras]]''' - Legendary buccaneer and smuggler. Sailor of [[Besq Boats]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Casostates''' - Was to judge a contest of smilching prowess at the [[Battle of Barnum Stones|Barnum Stones]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Corvin Axehand''' - Moved the [[Battle of Barnum Stones|Barnum Stones]] to Stindersgrough in -158 {{EC}}. &lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Crschmidt|Christopher Schmidt]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Daniel Mboya''' - Nephew of Windsor Creame; died recently in mysterious circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Dok|Dok]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''&amp;quot;Easy&amp;quot; Lizzard''' - An associate and confidante of [[Bobby Shwarmph]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Edvard von Craghelm]]''' - (died -20 EC) Famous [[Anaximancer]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Tehwalrus|Edward Shwarmph]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, quasi-science lover.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Pixel|Eric Vitiello]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, ex-member of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]], and farmer in Dandarth.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Arnia|Fingest Arnia]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, [[Amphitheatre aristocracy]] member.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Garth Haversham''' - Managing Editor of the [[Folktown Records]] on -7/9/15 EC.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Gibbous Saunders''' - (born -18 EC) Wrote to the [[Folktown Records]], published in edition 312.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Hemoss The Heretic''' - Issuer of two Great Heresies (cf. [[Altoxian Bulb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Honuphrius''' - Brother of the Lantern and denouncer of [[Arariax]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Izadora Gutschtup''' - Actress, Alezan or [[Bobby Shwarmph|Shwarmph]] childbearer depending on who you ask.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Jan ver Daath''' - Veteran of the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]. Retired from the [[Tarkherk Corps]] with a rank of Spearholder. He fooled us all.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, has written for the [[Folktown Records]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]''' - Neutral Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Juzh_Iruk|Juzh Iruk]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Litvia''' - A [[Paramount Queen]], joined with Bursine the 14th.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Madam Calvian''' - Neighbour to a [[Folktown Records]] employee.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Robbi|Makarii Spitignev]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, [[Iganefta]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Margaret Widderson''' - One of the foremost contemporary Andelight craftswomen.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Meldersen]]''' - [[Awal shrinkage]] scholar, has a famous axiom: &amp;quot;It's downside up!&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:D8uv|Melik Fizzuo]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and Fadr resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Monty Thabot''' - Vice Chairman of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]]'s Steering Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Morphous Ibb''' - (born -8 EC) Wrote to the [[Folktown Records]], published in edition 578.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Oblibestircus''' - Minor scholar, not of the ''maior et sanior pars''.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Phennella''' - Member of the [[Cranee Historical Society]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and self-styled &amp;quot;doctor&amp;quot; of occult studies.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Professor Altoxian]]''' - Inventor of the [[Altoxian Bulb]], [[Iganefta]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Prothall|Prothall]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Quezlar 6''' - (flourised -300 EC) Created [[Quezlarian Numerals]], crossed Elminster Mire.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]''' - (born -58 EC) Ghyll Lexicon scholar and [[Evesque Valley]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Rancticirchiretic''' - Scholar of the [[Nitenmangrey]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Revelerax''' - Former student of the [[Brothers of the Lantern]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Salerny Redthighs''' - Chief of the Looliers during the [[Battle of Barnum Stones]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and Tomlinson Bridleway restoration campaigner.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Siam Sinch''' - Artist, and daughter of [[Bavarian Creame]] from her previous marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Supetupheraraphes]]''' - Historian and coiner of the term &amp;quot;[[Aquentravalkeration|aquentravalkeration]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Deusx|Tamlin Moon]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tim Timperton''' - A [[Folktown Records]] writer and ex-member of the [[Council for Quezlarian Research]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Windsor Creame''' - (born -58 EC) Writer for the [[Folktown Records]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Encyclopedant_Calendar&amp;diff=23960</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Encyclopedant Calendar</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Encyclopedant_Calendar&amp;diff=23960"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:55:32Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Added details about Bethany Mboya.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;To nurture the creation of a Ghyll Encyclopedia that will be of use to all of Ghyll's citizens, the Encyclopedants--key editors, and instigators of the encyclopaedic effort--are taking certain measures to ensure that some regional variations are ''normalised'' to canonical systems. One of the regional variations that the Encyclopedants have felt it foremost necessary to address is that of dates and times.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
What this means to scholars is that when you submit entries that contain dates and times in a regional system, you will be asked (if we can get a message back to you) to provide them instead in the Encylopedant Calendar. It is the aim of this notice to define that calendar, and provide you with tips on the conversion. Should it be impossible for you to be contacted, the Encyclopedants will take up the changes themselves, attempting to provide normalisations where possible, and omitting dates otherwise.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==The Encyclopedant Calendar==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;background-color:#eee;border:1px solid #ccc;float:right;margin:1em;padding:0.5em;width:275px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;EC Linking Shortcut&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;: When using EC dates in your entries, always use the special &amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;{{EC}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt; syntax to link back to this page.  For example, typing &amp;quot;&amp;lt;nowiki&amp;gt;-20 {{EC}}&amp;lt;/nowiki&amp;gt;'&amp;quot; will produce the proper text, as well as an automatic link back to this explanation and timeline (below).&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The Encyclopedant Calendar (EC) is based on years, months, weeks, days, hours, minutes, and seconds. There are sixty seconds to a minute, sixty minutes to an hour, twenty-four hours to a day, seven days to a week, four weeks to a month, and a dozen months to a year. Hence there are three hundred and thirty six days in a year, as corresponds with a full rotation of our seasons.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The epoch for the Encyclopedant Calendar, i.e. 0 EC, is based on the date that the call for entries was first set forth over the fair lands of Ghyll. Hence, the first year of the creation of the Ghyll Encyclopedia will take place throughout 0 EC. Since scholars will generally be mentioning dates only when they have occured before the creation of the dictionary, it is expected that dates prior to 0 EC will be most heavily represented in entries: the syntax for doing so is to use a negative number for the amount of years. Note that -1 EC is the year before the creation of the Ghyll Encyclopaedia. It is expected that the first round of definitions for the twenty six letters of the alphabet will take one EC year to complete, and hence the next time we call for definitions of words beginning with &amp;quot;A&amp;quot; is predicted to occur at the start of 1 EC. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To identify a Ghyll month, use the year followed by a slash followed by the number of the month. Likewise, for a day, use the year followed by a slash followed by the number of the month followed by another slash followed by the day. ''Example: the fifth day of the seventh month of -20 EC would be written as -20/7/5 EC.'' For the names of individual months and days, consult the [[Bursine Calendar]] (on which the EC is based).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Ghyll Timeline==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In order to aid scholars' abilities to convert their regional dates into EC, the Encyclopedants have taken it upon themselves to research the dates for the events described in the first set of entires received for the letter &amp;quot;A&amp;quot;. It has been a painstaking and laborious process, but it should enable scholars to more easily research the EC date for events that they describe. The timeline is as follows: &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table class=&amp;quot;ghyllidx&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;padding-left:1em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Date&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Ghyll Event&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-??,???,??? EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The Avazian civilization falls.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-10,000,000 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;(Circa) Common ancestors to Ghyll humanoids and [[Burnflies]] roam the planet.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-900 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The [[Nitenmangrey]] culture became extinct.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-400 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Primitive forms of [[Bindlet Ball]] have been discovered in art of this period.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-400 to -323 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;(Circa) The [[Battle of Barnum Stones]] takes place.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-330 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Birth of Andelphracia.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-300 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Andelphracia and Quezlar 6 were active in this period.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-280 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Arariax]] the poet was born in the [[Evesque Valley]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-??? EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The [[Brothers of the Lantern]] school is established (exact date unknown).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr bgcolor=&amp;quot;#eee&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-200 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;''Historical records start to become difficult to decipher.''&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-192 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Birth of [[Captain Riquiras]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-172 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Earliest recorded drawings of [[Besq Boats]] date from this time period.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-158 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The [[Battle of Barnum Stones|Barnum Stones]] are moved  to Stindersgrough by Corvin Axehand.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-157 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Death of [[Captain Riquiras]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-150 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Earliest known use of the phrase &amp;quot;[[Andelphracian Lights]]&amp;quot;.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-150 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;(Circa) Alarius published &amp;quot;Stepping Stones&amp;quot;, considered one of his greatest poems.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-100 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The [[Brothers of the Lantern]] begin to specialize in four classical subjects.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-98 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Supetupheraraphes]] founds the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-98 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Supetupheraraphes]] becomes President of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-77 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Meldersen]] becomes President of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-70 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Two transcriptions of the Echecharion are known to exist.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-62/7/11 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Birth of [[Baron Claude Lloyd Albert Smallwood]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-60 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;(Circa) The current form of [[Bindlet Ball]], based on [[Awal shrinkage]], starts.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-58 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Birth of Windsor Creame.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-58 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Birth of [[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]], scholar.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-56 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Rancticirchiretic becomes President of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-54 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Ghyll Bindlet League, for [[Bindlet Ball]], is founded.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-53 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]]'s Steering Committee begins using three oxen in its motif.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-50 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Ball Lightning Liqueur]] and &amp;quot;Awal Sleeps&amp;quot; begin to see common usage.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-46 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Brother ([[Brothers of the Lantern|of the Lantern]]) Honuphrius denounces [[Arariax]]'s early/middle poems.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-38 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Incumbent Folktown mayor loses re-election; purportedly prefers another [[Bindlet Ball]] team.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-32 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Awal becomes President of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-25/4/1 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;H.A.N.D.B.A.G. petitions the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]] and is ignored.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-20 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Death of [[Edvard von Craghelm]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-19 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bindlet Ball]], Its Rules And History published (Aliens Press, 964 pages).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-18 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Birth of Gibbous Saunders.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-17 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]]'s motto is translated, and quickly changed.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-14 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;An act is passed that prohibits professional [[Bindlet Ball]] players from running for political office.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-14 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bobby Shwarmph]] publishes paper in [[Brothers of the Lantern]] scholarly journal.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-13 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Folktown Records]] weekly newspaper founded, 22nd March.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-11 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Doggerel plague]] sweeps parts of Ghyll.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-11 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Blivingdel becomes President of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-11 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Much-publicised marriage of artist Siam Sinch and statesman Gabson Foye.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-11 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;First [[lumogram]]s of [[Bethany Mboya]] released.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-11 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;First writings by [[Bethany Mboya]] released.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-8 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Birth of Morphous Ibb.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-8 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Windsor Creame weds [[Bavarian Creame]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-7 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The longest, and still in the 4th period, [[Bindlet Ball]] game starts.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-4/7/22 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Last known appearance of [[Bobby Shwarmph]].&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-2 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bethany Mboya]] exposed by Gabson Foye.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;0 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Ghyll Encyclopedia founded.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Folktown Records History==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;background-color:#eee;border:1px solid #ccc;float:right;margin:1em;padding:0.5em;width:275px;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;FR Editions Script&amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;: To convert the number of a Folktown Records edition into an EC date, you can use the [http://inamidst.com/misc/folkrec/250 online script]. Just replace the number in the URI (the Web address) with the one that you want the EC date of.&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
From the first set of entries received for the Encyclopaedia, it is clear that many dates are stated indirectly using Folktown Records edition numbers. Since the Folktown Records has only been running since -13 EC, this only works for recent events, but those are the events most relevant to the inhabitants of Ghyll today, and the Folktown Records are common and popular enough that we can expect more excerpts from them in entries to come. As the editions of Folktown Records have been produced without fail every week from -13/3/22, we can provide the following dates for landmark issues:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table class=&amp;quot;ghyllidx&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;padding-left:1em;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Date&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Folktown Records Event&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-13/3/22 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 1st edition of the Folktown Records (FR1).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-12/4/1 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 50th edition of the Folktown Records (FR50).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-12 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Windsor Creame joins the writing staff.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-11/4/15 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 100th edition of the Folktown Records (FR100).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-9/5/15 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 200th edition of the Folktown Records (FR200).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-8/6/1 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 250th edition of the Folktown Records (FR250).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-7/6/15 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 300th edition of the Folktown Records (FR300).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-7/9/15 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Gibbous Saunders [[AuroAnthropology|writes]] to FR312. Managing Editor: Garth Haversham.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-5/7/15 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 400th edition of the Folktown Records (FR400).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-3/8/15 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 500th edition of the Folktown Records (FR500).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-2/1/8 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;FR519 conjectures about [[Bobby Shwarmph]]'s possible death.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-1/4/1 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Morphous Ibb [[Quezlarian numerals|writes]] to FR578. Tim Timperton responds.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-1/9/15 EC&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;The 600th edition of the Folktown Records (FR600).&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;0/1/1&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;Ghyll Encyclopedia founding coincides with FR614.&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Note also that the following dates are currently unknown:&lt;br /&gt;
*[[User:Joe_Bowers|Mr. Bowers]] had a series entitled &amp;quot;Ersatz Bite: False Teeth through Time&amp;quot; published.&lt;br /&gt;
* The current owners of the Folktown Records are of the [[Amphitheatre aristocracy|Amphitheatre Elite]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:WhoIsWho&amp;diff=30480</id>
		<title>Ghyll:WhoIsWho</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:WhoIsWho&amp;diff=30480"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:49:18Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Added Talliesin and Bethany Mboya&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;==Who's Who in Ghyll?==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Listing in alphabetical order, not by surname, since some entries (Quezlar 6) don't have a known surname, and Ghyll sorting procedures for names--and even baby name giving procedures--are currently unknown. Note that the short descriptions below are NOT indicative of &amp;quot;all we know&amp;quot;... we just didn't duplicate data available elsewhere in the Encyclopedia. Consider using the search engine to find more information about a particular name.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Alarius]]''' - A renowned freethinker, philosopher and artist; son of [[Arariax]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Aminfarances]]''' - Founder of the [[Aminfarances Institute of Science and Technomancy]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Andelphracia''' - (flourised -300 EC) Mayoress of Fylesgate, inventor of [[Andelphracian Lights]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Arariax]]''' - (born c. -280 EC) One of Ghyll's most influential poets.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Awal''' - The first to apply [[Jesper's constant]] to the study of spelgof emulsions.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Baron Claude Lloyd Albert Smallwood]]''' - Wine producer, ex-husband of [[Bavarian Creame]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Bartmoss|Bartmoss]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, ex-member of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bavarian Creame]]''' - Wife of Windsor Creame.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bethany Mboya]]''' - “We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya”.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Blivingdel''' - An interpreter of Ternary Script.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bobby Shwarmph|Bobby &amp;quot;Robert&amp;quot; Shwarmph]]''' - Runs the [[Aliens Everywhere]] mag, lives near [[Alezan]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bordingbras''' - ''Mere bagatelle in the hands of a Fate'' (cf. [[Battle of Barnum Stones]], [[Bordingbras his hatt!]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bunny Hutch''' - Famed performance artist.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Bursine the 14th''' - Creator of the [[Bursine Calendar]], [[Hive-Lord]] of the [[Nitenmangrey]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Bysted Timperton]]''' - Vice Chairman of the [[Council for Quezlarian Research]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Captain Riquiras]]''' - Legendary buccaneer and smuggler. Sailor of [[Besq Boats]]. &lt;br /&gt;
* '''Casostates''' - Was to judge a contest of smilching prowess at the [[Battle of Barnum Stones|Barnum Stones]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Corvin Axehand''' - Moved the [[Battle of Barnum Stones|Barnum Stones]] to Stindersgrough in -158 {{EC}}. &lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Crschmidt|Christopher Schmidt]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Daniel Mboya''' - Nephew of Windsor Creame; died recently in mysterious circumstances.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Dok|Dok]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''&amp;quot;Easy&amp;quot; Lizzard''' - An associate and confidante of [[Bobby Shwarmph]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Edvard von Craghelm]]''' - (died -20 EC) Famous [[Anaximancer]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Tehwalrus|Edward Shwarmph]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, quasi-science lover.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Pixel|Eric Vitiello]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, ex-member of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]], and farmer in Dandarth.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Arnia|Fingest Arnia]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, [[Amphitheatre aristocracy]] member.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Garth Haversham''' - Managing Editor of the [[Folktown Records]] on -7/9/15 EC.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Gibbous Saunders''' - (born -18 EC) Wrote to the [[Folktown Records]], published in edition 312.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Hemoss The Heretic''' - Issuer of two Great Heresies (cf. [[Altoxian Bulb]]).&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Honuphrius''' - Brother of the Lantern and denouncer of [[Arariax]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Izadora Gutschtup''' - Actress, Alezan or [[Bobby Shwarmph|Shwarmph]] childbearer depending on who you ask.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, has written for the [[Folktown Records]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]''' - Neutral Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Juzh_Iruk|Juzh Iruk]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Litvia''' - A [[Paramount Queen]], joined with Bursine the 14th.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Madam Calvian''' - Neighbour to a [[Folktown Records]] employee.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Robbi|Makarii Spitignev]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar, [[Iganefta]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Margaret Widderson''' - One of the foremost contemporary Andelight craftswomen.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Meldersen]]''' - [[Awal shrinkage]] scholar, has a famous axiom: &amp;quot;It's downside up!&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:D8uv|Melik Fizzuo]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and Fadr resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Monty Thabot''' - Vice Chairman of the [[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]]'s Steering Committee.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Morphous Ibb''' - (born -8 EC) Wrote to the [[Folktown Records]], published in edition 578.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Oblibestircus''' - Minor scholar, not of the ''maior et sanior pars''.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Phennella''' - Member of the [[Cranee Historical Society]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:PhineasCrank|Doctor Phineas Crank]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and self-styled &amp;quot;doctor&amp;quot; of occult studies.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Professor Altoxian]]''' - Inventor of the [[Altoxian Bulb]], [[Iganefta]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Prothall|Prothall]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Quezlar 6''' - (flourised -300 EC) Created [[Quezlarian Numerals]], crossed Elminster Mire.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]''' - (born -58 EC) Ghyll Lexicon scholar and [[Evesque Valley]] resident.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Rancticirchiretic''' - Scholar of the [[Nitenmangrey]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Revelerax''' - Former student of the [[Brothers of the Lantern]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Salerny Redthighs''' - Chief of the Looliers during the [[Battle of Barnum Stones]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar and Tomlinson Bridleway restoration campaigner.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Siam Sinch''' - Artist, and daughter of [[Bavarian Creame]] from her previous marriage.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[Supetupheraraphes]]''' - Historian and coiner of the term &amp;quot;[[Aquentravalkeration|aquentravalkeration]]&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''[[User:Deusx|Tamlin Moon]]''' - Ghyll Lexicon scholar.&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Tim Timperton''' - A [[Folktown Records]] writer and ex-member of the [[Council for Quezlarian Research]].&lt;br /&gt;
* '''Windsor Creame''' - (born -58 EC) Writer for the [[Folktown Records]].&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Ghyll_Index&amp;diff=24948</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Ghyll Index</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Ghyll_Index&amp;diff=24948"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:46:48Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The following is a list of all encyclopedia entries, who originally phantomed them, and the entry author.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Phantom Entries==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These are entries yet to be defined. You can also see phantoms [[Special:Wantedpages|sorted by number of citations]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table class=&amp;quot;ghyllidx&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;float:left; padding-left:1em; width:48%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Entry Name&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Phantomed by&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Aliens Everywhere]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:tehwalrus|Edward Shwarmph]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Alezan Script]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Juzh_Iruk|Juzh Iruk]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Aminfarances]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Deusx|Tamlin Moon]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bavarian Creame]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bordingbras his hatt!]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bysted Timperton]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Captain Riquiras]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Dok|Dok]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Cataclysmatology]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Cataract Road]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Council for Quezlarian Research]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Cranee Historical Society]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Crschmidt|Christopher Schmidt]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Day of Champions]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Darvekian Party]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Deathbug]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:D8uv|Melik Fizzou]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Doggerel plague]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:PhineasCrank|Phineas Crank]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Edvard von Craghelm]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Prothall|Prothall]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Evesque Valley]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:D8uv|Melik Fizzou]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Fefferberry]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Folktown Records]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Heh-blammo balance]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Hive-Lord]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Iganefta]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Robbi|Makarii Spitignev]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Jesper's constant]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table class=&amp;quot;ghyllidx&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;float:right; padding-right:1em; width:48%;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Entry Name&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Phantomed by&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Karcist League]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:PhineasCrank|Phineas Crank]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Luminous manuscript]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Meldersen]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Mute Chukarandos]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:PhineasCrank|Phineas Crank]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Nanit]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Pixel|Eric Vitiello]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Nitenmangrey]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Occultologists]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Juzh_Iruk|Juzh Iruk]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Odlucian Library]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Prothall|Prothall]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Palace of Lost Souls]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Bartmoss|Bartmoss]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Paramount Queen]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Professor Altoxian]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Robbi|Makarii Spitignev]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Pyxie]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Quester and Phorrus]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Sarfelogian Mountains]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Spelgof]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Sphoxolis Trees]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Dok|Dok]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Splak]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Deusx|Tamlin Moon]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Supetupheraraphes]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Raking]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Tarkherk Corps]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Third Avazian War]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Pixel|Eric Vitiello]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Unquisition]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Vorpcara]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Crschmidt|Christopher Schmidt]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Whingelism]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;div style=&amp;quot;clear: both;&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&amp;lt;!-- necessary for proper table display --&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/div&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
==Encyclopedia Entries==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
These entries have been defined.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;table class=&amp;quot;ghyllidx&amp;quot; style=&amp;quot;padding-left:1em;width:92%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th style=&amp;quot;width:50%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Entry Name&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Phantomed by&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Defined by&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Adlorst Vinifera]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Aelfants]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Agony uncle]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Alarius]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Bartmoss|Bartmoss]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Alezan]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Crschmidt|Christopher Schmidt]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Alezan pantheon]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Arnia|Fingest Arnia]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Juzh_Iruk|Juzh Iruk]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Alezanians]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:tehwalrus|Edward Shwarmph]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Altoxian Bulb]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Robbi|Makarii Spitignev]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Aminfarances Institute of Science and Technomancy]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Deusx|Tamlin Moon]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Amphitheatre aristocracy]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Arnia|Fingest Arnia]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Anaximancer]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Prothall|Prothall]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Andelphracian Lights]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Anise Engine]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:PhineasCrank|Phineas Crank]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Aquentravalkeration]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Arariax]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:D8uv|Melik Fizzou]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[AuroAnthropology]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Avazian Box]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Pixel|Eric Vitiello]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Awal shrinkage]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th style=&amp;quot;width:50%&amp;quot;&amp;gt;Entry Name&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Phantomed by&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;th&amp;gt;Defined by&amp;lt;/th&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Ball Lightning Liqueur]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:PhineasCrank|Phineas Crank]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]]&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Baron Claude Lloyd Albert Smallwood]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:PhineasCrank|Phineas Crank]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Battle of Barnum Stones]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Ginestre|Ginestre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Besq Boats]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Dok|Dok]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bethany Mboya]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bindlet Ball]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:DrBacchus|DrBacchus]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bobby Shwarmph]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:tehwalrus|Edward Shwarmph]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Bast ResNovae|Bast ResNovae]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Brothers of the Lantern]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Jcowan|John Cowan]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bureau of Forgotten Knowledge]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Bartmoss|Bartmoss]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Burnflies]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Arnia|Fingest Arnia]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Joe Bowers|Joe Bowers]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Bursine Calendar]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Qwentyth Pyre|Qwentyth Pyre]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;tr&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[Quezlarian Numerals]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;-&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;td&amp;gt;[[User:Sbp|Sean B. Palmer]]&amp;lt;/td&amp;gt;&amp;lt;/tr&amp;gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;lt;/table&amp;gt;&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22779</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22779"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:41:20Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Citations''': [[burnflies]], [[betrothal march]], [[lumogram]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 11:41, 14 Sep 2004 (EDT)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22778</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22778"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:37:02Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Citations''': [[burnflies]], [[betrothal march]], [[lumogram]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 14:48, 14 Sep 2004(IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22777</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22777"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:36:26Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
'''Citations''': [[burnflies]], [[betrothal march]], [[lumogram]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
--[[User:Talliesin|Talliesin]] 13:48, 14 Sep 2004(IST)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
[[Category:People]]&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22776</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22776"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:07:16Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22775</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22775"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:05:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Record]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22774</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22774"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:04:29Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time [[Gabson Foye]], perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact Spearholder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22773</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22773"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T15:03:46Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Oh, I can only create 2 *new* phantoms.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time [[Gabson Foye]], perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact [[Spearholder]] Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22772</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22772"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T14:56:33Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist [[Siam Sinch]] and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final [[tri-menth]] of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying [[Gabson Foye]]. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the [[Karcist Truce]], taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the [[tri-menth]] especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer [[coomecloth]] which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and [[Bunny Hutch]]. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of [[numerical heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time [[Gabson Foye]], perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact [[Spearholder]] Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal hygeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22771</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22771"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T14:54:17Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist [[Siam Sinch]] and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final [[tri-menth]] of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying [[Gabson Foye]]. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the [[Karcist Truce]], taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the [[tri-menth]] especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer [[coomecloth]] which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and [[Bunny Hutch]]. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of [[numerical heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the [[Folktown Records]] was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time [[Gabson Foye]], perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact [[Spearholder]] Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal higeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22770</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22770"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T14:53:07Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist [[Siam Sinch]] and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final [[tri-menth]] of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying [[Gabson Foye]]. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the [[Karcist Truce]], taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the [[tri-menth]] especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer [[coomecloth]] which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and [[Bunny Hutch]]. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of [[numerical heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the percentages of members of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the Folktown Records was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time [[Gabson Foye]], perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact [[Spearholder]] Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal higeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22769</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22769"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T14:51:21Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist [[Siam Sinch]] and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final [[tri-menth]] of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying [[Gabson Foye]]. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the [[Karcist Truce]], taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the [[tri-menth]] especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer [[coomecloth]] which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[Bindlet_Ball|bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and [[Bunny Hutch]]. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of [[numerical heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the likelihood of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the Folktown Records was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time [[Gabson Foye]], perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact [[Spearholder]] Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal higeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22768</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22768"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T14:50:13Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Typo&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist [[Siam Sinch]] and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final [[tri-menth]] of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying [[Gabson Foye]]. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the [[Karcist Truce]], taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the [[tri-menth]] especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer [[coomecloth]] which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[bindlet ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and [[Bunny Hutch]]. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of [[numerical heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the likelihood of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the Folktown Records was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time [[Gabson Foye]], perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact [[Spearholder]] Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal higeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22767</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22767"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T14:47:54Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: Formatting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11{{EC}} she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist [[Siam Sinch]] and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final [[tri-menth]] of her [[betrothal march]] before marrying [[Gabson Foye]]. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the [[Karcist Truce]], taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the [[tri-menth]] especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of [[burnflies]] and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of [[lumogram]]s which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer [[coomecloth]] which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, [[brindle ball]] players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and [[Bunny Hutch]]. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of [[numerical heresy]].&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9{{EC}} that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopædia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopædia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopædia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much other endeavour, may give a good measure of the likelihood of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5{{EC}} it was common for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the Folktown Records was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
: A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3{{EC}} it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,437 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms on at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time [[Gabson Foye]], perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2{{EC}} he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact [[Spearholder]] Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the [[Tarkherk Corps]] – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the [[Conflict That Is Not Happening]]) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal higeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes, claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The writings clearly lost their market, and Bethany Mboya soon became no more than a memory.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22766</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22766"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T14:11:50Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11EC she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her betrothal march before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of burnflies and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of lumograms which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, brindle ball players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9EC that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopaedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopaedia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopaedia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much else endeavour, may give a good measure of the likelihood of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5EC it was normal for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the Folktown Records was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3EC it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,432 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms in at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2EC he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact SpearHolder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the Tarkherk Corps – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the Conflict That Is Not Happening) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal higeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes claims to have slept with Mboya immediately dropped in frequency.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
	<entry>
		<id>https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22765</id>
		<title>Ghyll:Bethany Mboya</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://www.disobey.com/w/index.php?title=Ghyll:Bethany_Mboya&amp;diff=22765"/>
		<updated>2004-09-14T13:48:10Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Talliesin: &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;hr /&gt;
&lt;div&gt;The story of Bethany Mboya is perhaps best conveyed following the order in which facts about her became known for otherwise it is hard to convey the serious impact she had upon the political, religious, scholarly, artistic life of Ghyll – and above all the impact various sensations had upon the Housewives And Nannies' Debatory Banter Association of Ghyll, who have still not recovered from some of the later revelations.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The birth date of Bethany was never clear but on her entering the public eye (so to speak) in -11EC she was apparently 19years of age. There being no record of her before than her name was assumed to be a pseudonym, especially since there was no record of the name Bethany before then and while there are now many girls called Bethany between the ages of 2 and 11 and while the name has again this year returned to popularity (being recorded by the Bureau of Numbing Research as the 4th most popular name for girl babies) it sounded quite exotic to the ear of her contemporaries.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is of course a feminine version of the common name Bedanant and Mboya is so common as to be almost a default when creating a pseudonym on the spot.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Of course, using a pseudonym is so common in Ghyll and all the more so amongst those who move in the artistic circles she immediately impacted that the use of a pseudonym was not remarkable except in that it added to the mystique that surrounded her past.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At any rate it was at the age of 19 that she was rumoured to be the romantic partner of the artist Siam Sinch and to be the inspiration for much of her work both in the rôle of  muse and as an intellectual force behind Sinch’s, now still rather daring, ideological views on the use of light in artistic expression.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Sinch denied all such rumours, or any knowledge of anyone by the name Bethany Mboya. However she was at that point entering the final tri-menth of her betrothal march before marrying Gabson Foye. Many therefore assumed that she was indeed involved with young Bethany but wished to keep it secret for, while it had not been enforced in law since the Karcist Truce, taking a lover during this period will still bring scorn from all but the most perversely depraved members of society.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The rumours intensified throughout the tri-menth especially after an incident, that they quite likely precipitated, when Sinch and Foye were entertaining guests that had travelled far to attend the marriage, which was now a mere two days away. Reports say that Foye was talking with some distant relatives and became visibly pained at what was being recounted to him. Abruptly he left that knot of people, approached another where Sinch was in the middle of an anecdote about a daring trip to Alezan with a childhood friend who was attending the wedding. Just as the friend and her began to argue about which of them had wet themselves when startled by a swarm of burnflies and which had fainted Foye lept upon them and focibly grabbed Sinch by the elbow and led her into a private room while her childhood friend fainted in shock.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Some indistinct, but clearly heated, words were heard being spoken by both Sinch and Foye. Then the argument abruptly stopped and Foye emerged from the room bleeding profusly from his nose and left the party. He was not seen again until the day of his wedding at which he had prominent bruising underneath both eyes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
After the wedding Foye and Sinch were reported to be the very model of a happily married couple and Mboya’s involvement with her seemed less likely as she never featured amongst the series of lovers Sinch later enjoyed.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Already at this time though Mboya was being featured in a series of lumograms which showed her wearing a light robe of sheer coomecloth which fluttered, often revealingly in the wind (indeed there was rumoured to be a limited collection of further lumograms which had a heavier ephasis on revealing and a considerably lighter emphasis on robes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The largest collection of these published contained the following accompanying text, which is attributed to Mikel Mboya (who did not claim to be a relative):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“Bethany’s hooded eyes shine from underneath her flowing red hair. A light sprinkle of freckles, like the sprinkle of stars on a clear summer night, sits delicately across the tops of her cheeks and decorates the wind-pinched blush that speaks of innocence and knowing at the same time. Her thighs are enticing curves of flawless white…”&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Bad purple prose aside, suffice it to say that she was considered attractive.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Around this time Mboya was reported to be lovers with a variety of artists, scholars, brindle ball players and politicians of every persuasion. Many denied the rumours, or ignored them, but some openly admitted to such affairs such as the performer Pararariax who claimed to be involved in a complicated relationship involving himself, Mboya and Bunny Hutch. He later claimed that she could be considered a 6th muse and was convicted of numerical heresy.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It was around -9EC that the first writings by Mboya were published. These small pamphlets, invariably featuring a lumogram on the back in the familiar situation of wearing clothes suitable for calm conditions in near-gale conditions, addressed a variety of subjects researched (if that word may be applied at all) through inspirational techniques that are at best lead to hard to verify results.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The effects of these pamphlets are hard to measure now. They tied in to various current trends in intellectual circles, in particular the morality of studying light, the benefits of publishing regained knowledge and the wisdom of commencing a project whereby a large body of scholarship would be published in the form of an encyclopaedia.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
None of this was entirely new, and some of it had peaked as a matter of controversy some time before, but it was in balancing the generally scholarly, scientific, and occultological nature of these trends with a poetic and irrational component that Mboya added a new flavour to intellectual life.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
“We are all enthrall[sic] to the beauty of Bethany Mboya” notes a comment scrawled in the margin of a draft index to this very encyclopaedia – adding the suggestion that the gender balance of the encyclopaedia’s scholars, being strikingly different to the more egalitarian balance in much else endeavour, may give a good measure of the likelihood of given sexes favouring female lovers.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In fairness a further comment scrawled below refutes this, and yet another note says “Just because none of us want to bring your putrid body to our beds does not mean we’re keeping the space warm for Bethany”.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -5EC it was normal for people, especially men, from all strands of cultural life to openly boast of nights spent in Mboya’s company, and of the considerable pleasure such encounters would bring&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Perhaps most remarkable is the general warmth felt towards Mboya from most quarters, including those who strongly resisted the scholarly and artistic movements with which she was associated. It is hard to find record of an unkind word being spoken of her, though clearly the mother mentioned in this extract from the Folktown Records was an exception:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Q: My mother says that Bethany Mboya is “No better than she ought to be”. What does this strangely formed sentence mean, and is it true?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
A: I can assure you from personal experience that Bethany is considerably better than any one woman has any right to be.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
By -3EC it was clear that it was not physically possible for Bethany Mboya to have the estimated 6,432 lovers she was said to have taken that year and still have time to publish a pamphlet on the importance of light in the racial memory of Ghyll and pose for at least 27 lumograms in at least 3 different windswept moors wearing (or nearly wearing) at least 7 different robes or gowns alike in the lack of resistance they posed to the slightest breeze.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
More pressingly it was increasingly clear that Mboya did not appear in public and was seen only in the lumograms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
At this time Gabson Foye, perhaps still smarting from the events some 6 years previous, began to research the source of the pamphlets and lumograms. Early in -2EC he located Bethany Mboya.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Upon discovering that Bethany Mboya was in fact SpearHolder Jan ver Daath (Retired) of the Tarkherk Corps – a fat balding man lacking his right eye and two fingers on his left hand (a legacy of his part in the Conflict That Is Not Happening) afflicted by an immediately perceptible lack of personal higeine and a tendency to sratch his genitals with his injured hand every 2 to 3 minutes.&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>Talliesin</name></author>
		
	</entry>
</feed>