|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | In my official capacity as Author Laureate I hereby nominate you for the title Proofreader Laureate. ;) --[[User:DrAckroyd|Dr. H. L. Ackroyd]] 20:20, 26 Jan 2005 (EST)
| + | {{ResolvedTalk}} |
| − | | |
| − | Just another test of the automated "you got mail" feature of MW. --[[User:Morbus Iff|Morbus Iff]] 17:17, 23 May 2005 (EDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Hm.. let me run this past you. This is the basis on which I made the decision that the hork could carry James:
| |
| − | | |
| − | The entry for [[TransAvian]] states that the weight of a coconut is approximately 9 lugyup.
| |
| − | | |
| − | In the entry for the [[Chesix System of Measures]] it is stated:
| |
| − | | |
| − | (A) "A cube of water 1 nanit x 1 nanit x 1 nanit will have a mass of 1,331 gyup, equal to 0.86037 lugyup."
| |
| − | | |
| − | (B) "1 nanit = 20 centimetres (7.87 inches)"
| |
| − | | |
| − | From (B), the cube of water described in (A) measures 20cm on a side. This cube will have a volume of 8 litres.
| |
| − | | |
| − | Assuming that water has the same density in Ghyll and Gerth (1 litre weighs approximately 1 kilogram), the cube of water described in (A) weighs approximately 8 kilograms.
| |
| − | | |
| − | From this we can equate 8kg with 0.86037 lugyups. Therefore, 9 lugyups (as mentioned in the Transavian entry) is approximately 83.7kg! It seems the Ghyllian coconuts weigh a lot more than ours. And why not?
| |
| − | | |
| − | I haven't done much research on Ghyllian physiology, but I haven't found any mention of how much a typical Ghyllian weighs. I'm sure it could be inferred from some combination of entries. However, as long as James weighed less than 80kg, the hork would have been able to carry him. --[[User:Larj Zyquon|Larj Zyquon]] 11:30, 25 May 2005 (EDT)
| |
Latest revision as of 21:38, 9 July 2005
This Talk: page once existed, but has since been resolved, refactored, or made irrelevant.
To see the text that was once here, choose a previous version under the History tab.
If you need to add new discussion, remove the reference to this template.
