Difference between revisions of "Ghyll talk:Clamorxian Decoding Method"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(* Sounds good to me *) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Once I've added something to the index, I'm still allowed to go back and revise it until the turn officially ends, right? I mean, I try and get it completed and ready before I go in and add it, but if I realize I left out a paragraph on, say, the remote connection between the various uses of the Clamorxian Decoding Method and the mating habits of the common Pyxie, I can still do that, right? --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 01:35, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT) | Once I've added something to the index, I'm still allowed to go back and revise it until the turn officially ends, right? I mean, I try and get it completed and ready before I go in and add it, but if I realize I left out a paragraph on, say, the remote connection between the various uses of the Clamorxian Decoding Method and the mating habits of the common Pyxie, I can still do that, right? --[[User:Dfaran L'Eniarc|Dfaran L'Eniarc]] 01:35, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I think that's the way it works. It's how I've been doing it and no one has complained about it yet. Just as long as you get the article completed before the end of the letter Turn, you should be fine. :) --[[User:Undrhil|Trousle Undrhil]] 01:57, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT) | ||
Revision as of 01:57, 3 June 2005
Once I've added something to the index, I'm still allowed to go back and revise it until the turn officially ends, right? I mean, I try and get it completed and ready before I go in and add it, but if I realize I left out a paragraph on, say, the remote connection between the various uses of the Clamorxian Decoding Method and the mating habits of the common Pyxie, I can still do that, right? --Dfaran L'Eniarc 01:35, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT)
- I think that's the way it works. It's how I've been doing it and no one has complained about it yet. Just as long as you get the article completed before the end of the letter Turn, you should be fine. :) --Trousle Undrhil 01:57, 3 Jun 2005 (EDT)
